I'd be more upset about this if cars were also fitted with speed limiters.
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2026
146 points (98.7% liked)
Canada
12516 readers
499 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
π Meta
πΊοΈ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
ποΈ Cities / Local Communities
- Anmore (BC)
- Burnaby (BC)
- Calgary (AB)
- Comox Valley (BC)
- Edmonton (AB)
- East Gwillimbury (ON)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kingston (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Niagara Falls (ON)
- Niagara-on-the-Lake (ON)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Sarnia (ON)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Squamish (BC)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Whistler (BC)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
π Sports
Baseball
Basketball
Curling
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- MontrΓ©al Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
π» Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
π΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- Buy Canadian
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Canadian Skincare
- Churning Canada
- Quebec Finance
- Canada Grown Business
π£οΈ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
π Social / Culture
- 2 North American 4 You (Shitposting & Memes, North America focus)
- Ask a Canadian
- Bières Québec
- Canada Francais
- Canadian Gaming
- Eh Buddy Hoser (Shitposting & Memes, Canada focus)
- EhVideos (Canadian video media)
- First Nations
- First Nations Languages
- Indigenous
- Inuit
- Logiciels libres au QuΓ©bec
- Maple Music (music)
π Other Relevant Communities
Rules
-
Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
-
Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cars are fitted with speed limiters and have been for a long time. 160km/h - 165km/h is typical for cars to stop accelerating at.
Sorry, I meant reasonable speed limiters. If the bike is capped at 32kph, so should the cars. We're talking about safety, right?
That...is a pretty dumb take.
Bikes/Scooters are not cars, they're not insured, they're not licensed. Children can and regularly do use them.
Now if you want to talk about properly ticketing, charging, and impounding cars/drivers breaking the rules, that's a different conversation. But an ebike or scooter going 120km/h isn't the same as a car doing 120km/h on a highway.
It's more an objection to the typical "personal freedom" argument you get from car drivers who balk at the idea of speed limiters. There is no road in North America with a speed limit of 160kph, so a hard limit of that value is meaningless. I'd be open to a dynamic speed limiter that was context-aware though: we already see that cars have the capability of knowing the current speed limit and chiming to let the driver know they're busting the limit. There's no reason why the limit shouldn't be enforced there in the same way that e-bikes have a fixed limit... even when they're forced to share a road with cars that do not obey the limit.
I accept your argument that bikes aren't insured or licensed, and that this can be used as an excuse to limit their capabilities, but as one of the law-abiding e-bike riders who's been tailgated, close-passed and nearly run off the road by more than a few angry drivers, I can assure you that e-bikes are not the problem when it comes to safety. 2-tonnes of steel and glass being driven by (licensed, insured) absolute maniacs is the real threat.
I think some form of limit aware speed chime or warning is required on new cars sold in the EU. Having driven a few, I would not want to trust that technology to slow the car down.
Many times I have had a carβs camera pick up a speed limit sign from a neighbouring road to the highway and indicate that I was suddenly going 60 km/h over the new speed limit. Same thing if GPS tracking or map data isnβt perfect on cars that use that instead.
load more comments
(1 replies)
That...is a pretty dumb take
i don't agree
cars cause way more deaths, i'm all for limiting them to 30 km/hr. And even if scooters cause deaths its mostly the idiot riding them, with cars, the drivers murder other people ... all the time.
load more comments
(1 replies)
? I've definitely exceeded that in cars and pickup trucks
nah, not safe enough. we need them to go 32kmph. thats safe.
32,000 mph?!
Thatβs the only way they can get far enough away that Iβll be happy.
If it would be up to me, I'd force everyone to get a special driving license for cars going upwards this limit.
If bigger transport requires a special license and an expertise in driving them, so should speedy cars. And it should be harder to pass since it is more dangerous to drive over this limit.
My car is governed to 100mph. It could go faster but it won't.
Okay, but 100 mph is crazy fast...
But we also wouldn't want it to be much lower since passing on 2-lane roads is generally safer at faster speeds, so putting a, say, 120 km/h speed limit on cars might be less safe than no limits.
"Crazy fast" is contextual to be honest. Going 100 mph in a school zone is crazy fast. Going 100 mph on the unlimited sections of the German autobahn is pretty tame.
This is also been the traditional challenge with speed limiters - You can't set a single universal "safe" speed. That said, with GPS and traffic sign recognition, we can now use dynamic limiters to adjust to match the speed limit imposed where the vehicle is currently driving.
That said, with GPS and traffic sign recognition, we can now use dynamic limiters to adjust to match the speed limit imposed where the vehicle is currently driving.
In theory. In practice the car picks up signs from the slip road or GPS location for the parallel local road or doesn't know what the "in caso di nebbia" text under the 50km/h sign on the motorway means.
load more comments
(1 replies)
The problem isn't the speed, there aren't speed restrictors on motorcycles or cars.
The problem is there's no safe lane for them to be ridden. There's no infrastructure accommodation for them. They can't be ridden on the sidewalk, and they're unsafe in regular traffic. Bicycle lanes aren't ubiquitous enough or designed well enough for bicycles, let alone these mixing with bicycles.
As usual, rather than raising taxes on the filthy rich to fund better infrastructure for the good of the people, they limit what we can do because it's cheaper and we have less power to resist, or at least, aren't organized well enough to exercise the power we have.
Weird you missed another key distinction: testing, licensing, and associated age restrictions.
At these speeds they're electric motorcycles. They should be treated accordingly (and I say that as an avid cyclist who's incredibly supportive of e-bikes).
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why not just classify them as mopeds? Mopeds have been around for ages, started out as motorized bicycles, are limited to around 28mph, and have standard age, and license requirements. You have to get a license, and plates. I think there is an insurance requirement also.
I feel like applying all the same guidelines to e-bikes would go a long way to resolve the chaos they have been causing.
Obviously there would need to be some new parameters around what exactly qualifies and all that.
Electric mopeds exist, depending on where you are on they're great. But we want there also to be slower ebikes that don't need all that licensing and which can be used in bike lanes.
In some ways speed is an issue, for instance if you could go the same speed as the rest of the traffic you could avoid situations where you're biking on a tiny strip on the edge of the road and cars pass you very close, by staying in the middle of the road instead. Of course just adding adequate bike lanes would be the better solution since then you wouldn't have any safety downsides for going slower.
I don't think adding bike lanes would solve the speed issue. I think bike lanes should not have any bikes or devices in there that can go over 30-40kph because then you will have a mix of regular bikes and super fast ebikes which will eventually cause an accident with someone crashing into a regular bike.
If you want to go over 30-40kph stick to the regular traffic lanes.
My point is, in the absence of good bike lanes, being speed limited can be dangerous, there's more motivation to want something that can keep up with the flow of traffic. If there was accommodation for slower bike traffic, ebikes with lower max speed would be more desirable/functional.
If an ebike can go fast enough riding in regular car lanes shouldn't be too much of an issue. It wouldnt be any more dangerous than driving a motorcycle.
The main reason bikes don't do well in car lanes is because they can't keep up with the flow of traffic typically and cause cars to pile up behind them and then people get impatient and aggressive.
An ebike that can go 50-60kph would basically just be a motorcycle in traffic that could then slip into a bike lane when traffic gets bad.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I unlocked the speed limiter on my ebike soon after I bought it. It was easy to find out how by reading the instruction manual - hold down some key combo on the display box and enter secret menu.
Did some testing on my rural road and got up to 45 MPH going downhill in its top gear. It felt very unsafe so I only tried that once.
No, I'm not doing that on sidewalks or around any people. Also I am licensed to drive a motorcycle on public roads.
It's illegal to ride on sidewalks at all. No new law needed for that.
Is that part of the highway act?
Itβs always been illegal where Iβve lived, rarely enforced, so I just thought it was municipal.
It's municipal. Mississauga had riding on sidewalks. Not sure if that's still the case.
The speed is fine, the stopping power is the problem. Like the musclecar guys with 50s front drum brakes. π
load more comments
(2 replies)
Ah so these are the people riding down sidewalks where I live
You just reminded me, I was very slowly coasting my bike (one metre per second?) down the sidewalk next to my apartment as I waited for traffic to clear to get on the road. I saw two young boys, approx three and four years old, ten metres up the sidewalk but they hadn't seen me yet. The older brother saw me, shrieked, and stepped over to shield his little brother from my rampage. It was so cute. :)
I know this is a Canada thread, but surely one of these stores is City e-Bike in the small Colorado town of South ~~Park~~ America
Bicycles are supposed to ride on the road (not sidewalk) yes? So why are they being limited to a speed that is actively disruptive to traffic? Going 30 in a 50 zone means you are going 20km/h under the limit, which is considered disruptive and is actuality a ticket-worthy offense if you are in a car. So why are bikes being limited to that? This makes no sense. If you don't want bike lanes and want bikes to ride with traffic, then they need to be able to flow with the speed of traffic. Absolute mindless nonsense! It's safer to be going the speed of traffic than to be going slower and have an impatient car try to get past the slow AF cyclist.
That also seems really slow, to me.
On a modest downhill on my POS rusty mountain bike, I'm pretty sure I get up to about 50 km/h, and can go the speed of traffic. I sometimes need to brake so I don't pass cars! On an efficient road bike, I imagine I could sustain speeds above 32 km/h on level roads, too.
I just looked it up, and indeed: 1 km cycle speeds of 40+ km/h are fairly pedestrian.
A 32 km/h level-ground limit seems really slow.
I am an experienced (adult) driver, cycle defensively, about major roads, drive according to conditions, etc., so I know how to use roads safely. If I had one of these, I imagine I would be really frustrated to be going slower than I could cycling, so I'd probably disable the limiter myself, tooβbut I wouldn't be going north of 50 on any bike, electric or not.
Going highway speeds on a bicycle is insanity, regardless of age. And children shouldn't be operating motor vehicles at all. (Well, aside from walking- or jogging-speed toys, not on roads). But 32 km/h seems overly restrictive, and inviting non-compliance.
If I had one of these, I imagine I would be really frustrated to be going slower than I could cycling, so I'd probably disable the limiter myself, too
If this is anything like in Europe, then the limit is where the assistance stops. You're still free to pedal as fast as you like
load more comments
(1 replies)
They are an amazing technology. Slowly they will change transportation in cities. A 120 km/h and a 100 km range is a game changer.
They have been banned in the CBD of my city because they are ridden on footwaths plenty and after numerous collision injuries someone was killed by an electric scooter. They are need to be regulated, licenced and only ridden on the road/cycle paths if they go that fast (whilst also being practically silent mind you).
I get annoyed by them all the time because people rip them around in places you wouldn't take a car, and they're getting powerful enough to be dangerous. Still, the potential is huge. They use so much less space, infrastructure, and energy than cars. They're also significantly cheaper.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Darwin has awards to award
Was at the fair they were doing a drawing for an RC remote control car they claim will do 80MPH. That alone is insane.
It sounds like most people don't understand what a meat crayon is. It's fine, just require a license and make sure the class shows what motorcycle accidents look like, all the gore and the screaming. I remember one video, even with having all the bike gear, hit a bump and headbutted a stone wall. Dead.
view more: next βΊ