this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
166 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

5403 readers
186 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This warning is like 10 years late.

If I ever going to get a car, it's going to be a used one from around 2005.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some cars you can just pull the fuse for the modem. You lose a lot of features, but that's the trade off.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It would depend on the features lost (I've heard rumours that some cars lock the trays or reclining the seats behind the modem access) and on whether such a modification would run afoul of the certification processes needed to keep the car on the street, legally speaking.

For much less mental health hassle, I could simply search for an older car.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

Just do the antenna then. Hopefully it doesn't brick itself when it loses signal.

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

There are kits you can get that pretend to be a valid modem to your car, so that you can disable the modem without losing any other features. They are usually between $50 to $100

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

My 2013 cars do not have any way to phone home.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

We've got a 2015 Toyota Highlander with only Bluetooth for the headunit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

My truck is 2006. It has a cd player.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Well now that's an interesting one! It has been a long while since I last saw a CD player in a vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Cars should not connect to the internet. Or at minimum have an easy way to physically disable the internet (ex: a physical off switch for the modem).

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, there are many convenient things you can do with having cars connect to the Internet. I don't agree that that's the answer to this problem.

The answer is that Stallman was right, software should be free as in freedom (i.e. among other things, modifiable by the user), and that includes software that powers cars. If we lived in that world, cars would only connect to the Internet for purposes chosen by the user.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

But we don't live in that world so cars shouldn't connect to the Internet. If we need Internet in the car we can use out phones. At least then we only have one invasive thing.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That world should still be the societal end goal.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah when we get there. We have a whole shit ton of privacy issues to resolve before we go making arguments that cars should be online.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wait until you find out that other car's smart features could be used to spy on you. All those Tesla and Waymo cameras just ripe for the picking.

A big surveillance hive swarm of vehicles.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 weeks ago

HAH, "could be." Bro they're already selling your driving data to your insurance company and they're using it to raise your rates, have been since like 2013.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

"Aye?" No, ARRRRRRRRRRRRR!

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

Oohhhh, who lives in a pineapple under the sea?

[–] antianarchist@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 weeks ago

Wow, the Guardian on par with the speeds of IE6.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (46 children)

Theyve been spying for 15 years. They can control you too. Why do you think they wanted electric steering and to get rid of throttle cables and "safe" automatic braking? Control. They can lock your doors and drive you anywhere, they can slam on your brakes as a semi truck is behind you if they deem you a threat to dear Leader.

The power they have now to get rid of undesireables , and sweep it all under the rug is a fascists dream.

[–] trebach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago

GM started installing OnStar in some vehicles starting in the 1997 model year so they've had the ability since then.

load more comments (44 replies)
[–] Abrinoxus@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago

Just Lol for Life need a spy chief for this??

[–] crenquis@lemmy.today 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That is one of the primary reasons that I am interested in the Slate electric pickup in the U.S. No internet -- they do have an optional module that one can add if you really want the extra monitoring/controls that having a connected vehicle provides. Music/gps/etc is all via your own device. I don't know of any other modern vehicle in the U.S. I can get that has that option. (my 14 yr old car is getting to the stage where repairs are more than it is worth)

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

Our car was 11 years old and needed a lot of work. We got rid of it for a 22 year old car that was in mint shape. So now no infotainment tracking or anything. 😛

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago

are the same people concerned about car data switching to analog phones?

Phones are grabbing all the same data.

[–] thechosen2nd@piefed.social 1 points 4 weeks ago

NO! YA'LL THINK SO ??

load more comments
view more: next ›