this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
43 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck AI

8423 readers
827 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The EU’s goal of ramping up data centre capacity is already driving more investment in nuclear energy projects as the bloc seeks to decarbonise and secure energy security at the same time, says the global investment firm.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Yeah, right after they've burned a trillion gallons of diesel in diesel generators to power the data centers.

[–] Lickems@piefed.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The EU's reaction to AI has been so sad. Hard to keep hope when the only sane region in the world is also fully on board.

[–] eremophila@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

The region is hardly sane, it is already very nuclear.

New Zealand has traditionally been about the sanest, their standards slipped in their last election though.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago

nuclear business bros crawled so AI business bros could fly.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bullshit. They won't wait that long.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

you mean for a generation or so? Yeah, lol, the AI hype will die off in a few years.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Those take decades to build, so I highly doubt that.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Decades to build and Billons to subsidize

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Have you seen the modern modular nuclear reactors? They can be up and running in a matter of months, two years you can build a complex in GWs.

On paper or in practice? Including the extra time required for lawsuits from nearby residents and environmental groups, protests, etc.?

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything but solar huh? I guess it's a start.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

Nuclear bros have been grifting for much longer than AI bros.

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Note to journalists: please don’t put “nuclear” and “boom” in the same sentence. Thanks.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Nuclear" and "Boom" shouldn't be used in the same sentence.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

"Wait, I need to check Twitter what happens in Japan!"

"BOOM. BOOM. BOOM."

* closes browser tab and cries *

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What if we used that nuclear energy to phase out coal and oil?

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

What if we asked dragons to boil water for energy?

[–] tardigrade@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 week ago

It will have to be seen whether the EU sees a nuclear boom, but globally we will see this I am afraid. The two countries leading the AI race at the moment definitely will: The U.S. government has reaffirmed nuclear power as a key pillar of its long-term clean energy strategy a year or so ago, with the revival previously retired reactors and extensions of aging ones.

And China has joined a pledge to triple global nuclear energy capacity by 2050 which stemmed from the 2023 UN Climate Change Conference in Dubai, also known as COP28,

... The installed [nuclear] capacity has been growing at a remarkable rate in China, the future home of just under half of the world’s nuclear reactors currently under construction .... [China's nuclear] capacity addition should accelerate [by 2030, according to China's current five-year plan], as the State Council has been approving 10 or more new reactor units annually since 2022 ...

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Fact check: The number of nuclear reactors in the EU is constantly falling since end of the 1980s.

The two main reasons are safety and costs.

And no, 1000 reactors - developed underenormous cost pressure - producing 100 kW of energy each are not going to be safer than 10 reactors producing 10GW each, for similar reasons that 1000 vehicles transporting 4 people each along a busy motorway are not safer than 1 high-speed train transporting 1000 people.