this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
682 points (95.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

16697 readers
565 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hexdream@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Shouldn't "kids" be in the second column?

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

"I sacrificed the kids for the kids"

[–] hexdream@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Yes, because for half of those monster cars , the drivers justified that it's great for school runs etc. So fuck everyone else's kids, mine are ok in the truck.

[–] teslekova@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is a outrage.

I live near a school. There's a raised crossing on the road outside it, like a speed bump with a zebra crossing. I have to go like 40 km/h when crossing it, and it's quite comfortable and smooth but it slows me down a bit.

Those kids should send me money.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The kids themselves don't even slow me down since I have a gigantic truck!

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh come on, they do drive slightly slower around schools. If that's not a sacrifice, I don't know what is.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

Nah! Speed limits are just a suggestion!

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately every generation that experienced this as kids are now perpetuating the same with their shitty SUVs and "but muh children safety!!!"

source: 90s kid who played on the streets with their friends and now my friends are speeding around with their SUVs

[–] Ajdee6@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes in the 90s there was no cars in the street and no one was speeding!!

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

What do you mean, drivers haven't sacrificed anything? Just think of all the playgrounds that could be turned into parking lots!

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I'm from the bad old days when kids rode bicycles without helmets or parents.

Two neighborhood kids got creamed by a pickup truck. As a coincidence my family drove past the scene shortly afterwards and I'll never forget the surreal color of blood soaking through the sheets covering their bodies. I'm really glad I didn't know it was my friends when I saw it.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There is a solution

Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

Put "e-bikes" on the list too.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Majority of those are largely solved with good city planning and other regulations around cars, including a healthy amount of drivers ed as well as actually taking away people's license for repeated or severe offenses (note I said or, not and - either one should be enough). I drive a car, so does pretty much everyone else on my street, and yet children do play on the street, much like we did 25 years ago when I was a kid here (there are fewer kids, but that's a different issue entirely, we've had low birth rates since the 90s or 00s). Keys: Narrow street, very few American style pickup trucks (There's an Amarok someone on the street uses as a work car and that's literally it). The speed limit is technically 50 km/h because there's no specific speed limit set on this street and it's not marked as a "living street", yet you almost never see anyone go that fast. We don't even have a speed bump because it's just not been necessary. Both entries into the street have you come in at low speed.

Both here in my small town and in the country in general, it's fairly common to walk or bike to school. Usually the main thoroughfare of any suburb or town has a wide sidewalk on one or both sides, and side streets tend to be narrower and potentially limited to 20 or 30 km/h and since there's often no sidewalk on those, the DEFAULT assumption is that there will be pedestrians and cyclists you share the road with. The law also states that in close proximity to pedestrians, you have to slow down to near-pedestrian speeds (not exactly defined and since cops love giving out tickets, you'd better err on the safe side).

Air quality will be a mostly solved issue once EVs are as cheap to buy as used diesel cars too, they're certainly cheaper to run already if not accounting for purchase cost. Petrol doesn't pollute nearly as badly locally as diesel does, it's worse for global warming though (CO2 tends to be higher). But for now of course it is indeed sad we breathe in toxic fumes.

As for play at night, that's just illegal here, kids have a curfew starting at 11 PM (or midnight in the summer), after which they can only be outside with their parents or guardians. Like... let's be honest, do you want your kids out without an adult after that time? Even if there's no cars, guess what else a walkable city is conducive to - alcoholics wandering around. And yes, if you've grown up with them, you know to ignore them, but maybe one out of a hundred is still dangerous occasionally when in a bad mood.

Anyway I know this is fuckcars, but you CAN achieve much of this without outright banning cars and honestly it's nicer as a driver too. I was in the US for a week a few years ago and while I was able to walk to some of the places I needed to (in a small town of ~20k in upstate NY because I was visiting relatives), I found it easier to take the rental car to most places. Yay V8 SUV powered grocery store runs (hey, we were in the US, we wanted to test what it's like to just guzzle fuel without giving any fucks since it's so cheap). Not how I feel in Estonia, where I've never lived farther than 1 km from a decent grocery store I could safely walk to. If the weather's nice and I'm not in a hurry, I'll just walk to the store unless I know I need more stuff than I can carry. Much of the time I'm in a hurry because my own life is super busy lately, so I'll drive, but since so many other people walk, cycle or take transit, you only really see traffic jams at rush hour and only in the bigger cities and even then they're not very long.

Honestly feel like 99% of American cities are designed to be frustrating to everyone involved. Walk or cycle? Die being hit by a car because there's no fucking sidewalk, let alone cycle path. Drive? Die of boredom in traffic jams because EVERYONE is driving and cities are designed like shit. NYC was awesome though, even if the subway train sounded like it had nearly derailed in every sharp turn (and those were some sharp ass turns for something on rails).

[–] purrtastic@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

Some good points. Note that tyre pollution is a huge issue for all cars. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724012920

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

To be clear cars aren't the problem because its an inanimate object it doesn't drive itself off the lot. We can't have safe streets for the same reason we can't have most of what you mentioned because of drivers.

In the US EV are about 2% of cars and will be the majority around 2000 never due to lobbyists also EV actually create lots of air pollution via their tires even without emissions.

Also most parts of the country just isn't that walk-able outside urban core. I live in an area of 75k adjacent to a city of 700k.. In the smaller burg I decided to walk from POINT A -> POINT B 11 miles for fun to see if I could do it. It was only possible in the dead of night because of how many death traps had neither sidewalk nor even a walkable shoulder like if a car had come at the wrong time I would have had to jump in a ditch full of sticker bushes. There were I think on the order of 14 parts of the walk that were crazy dangerous in 11 miles.

In the larger one there are less but not NO insane spots more side walks but many places that were theoretically traversible but actively very dangerous due to design.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ridiculous, my power to weight ratio is all kinds of fucked up thanks to needless safety devices, and how am I supposed to get good aerodynamics when I'm only allowed to cripple children and not outright murder them when I hit them?!

[–] destructdisc@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Abandon your futile pursuit of aerodynamics in favor of sheer child-murdering mass.

[–] tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

wHaT iF tHeY nEeD iT fOr WoRk

[–] DoGeeseSeeGod@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Before the 2000s work wasn't as big so they didn't need such big trucks. Now work is so huge we gotta have the biggest truck possible. Please don't ask about truck bed space between trucks pre 2000s and post 2000s. They are def bigger now, right? Otherwise we'd just look like selfish pricks who risk the lives of others for our ego

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Identical argument to guns for hunting.

I saw a driver brake for children at a crosswalk once, stop being hyperbolic. /S

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Things car drivers see as sacrifices: not allows to roll coal when idling by a school, having to slow down for people to cross the road, sometimes possible parking spaces have bollards in the way.

[–] teslekova@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Also, not allowed to drive as a kid. I say let em at it, they'll be just as good as senior citizens.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

There definitely should be some things in column B. Those bloodstains aren't easy to get out of the grill, for instance.

[–] Doom@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Now now. Thanks to kids we all have to be reminded to buckle our seat belts and not leave children in hot vehicles. Soooo many excessive beeps and safety equipment for the children. Won't you think of the mildly inconvenienced drivers?

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago

Freedoms are always a balance between two groups and what we culturally consider a harm or undue burden informs where we draw the line. And a lot of cultures right now are pretty autocratic.