636
Oh boy, goodie! (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 153 points 5 months ago
[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 months ago
[-] neonred@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

My mouse is your mouse (and your mouse is mine)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_NKQ-qoYx84

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 87 points 5 months ago

Technically this post is illegal until tomorrow, but I dig that.

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 109 points 5 months ago

It's tomorrow in some places 😂.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Yeah but the IP was held by an American Company.

Happy New Year.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Would using a VPN make posting it from NZ illegal right after midnight if the IP is logged from a country not past midnight?

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I love that we're having a whole hypothetical discussion about this. I think the time in the timezone where the rights were held probably took priority over the time for the poster of the image at the time of upload. Regardless of what timezone you post from, it would have been posted before midnight for Disney and the relevant courts.

[-] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That sounds to me like it's probably correct. 👍

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago
[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago
[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

They used to be

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 5 months ago

Not really. I think it's considered free speech if it's sarcastic or a parody.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Free speech doesn't apply to Intellectual Property at all, or rather you're free to say whatever you want but you can still be sued for anything that you say.

What you're thinking of is "Fair Use".

[-] jaschen@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 5 months ago

Thanks for the clarification.

[-] ADTJ@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago

" If Disney sues, we'll claim fair use...

Ho hi! "

[-] janus2@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 months ago

"hi ho, hi ho, it's off to court we go..."

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

And fair use exists to protect free speech.

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Yes, the infamous "sarcastic" exception to copyright.

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

It's still illegal. This version of Mickey Mouse is still covered under trademark law.

[-] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

What do you mean? What part of this infringes on copyright?

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Trademark. Not copyright. And the part that is covered is Mickey.

This could also be covered under copyright, since the only Mickey that went into public domain is the one from Steamboat Willie, not this one. I'm not a lawyer, though.

[-] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago

This is the one from steamboat willy though

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago
[-] lapommedeterre@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

As of 2024, Micky is now public domain, at least the variant from Steamboat Willie.

[-] digger@lemmy.ca 80 points 5 months ago

Show us the hands! Willie, in the public domain, doesn't wear gloves. Mickey, still Disney IP, does wear gloves.

[-] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago

Mickey is ready for your prostate exam.

[-] ADTJ@feddit.uk 16 points 5 months ago

Yet somehow the Steamboat Willie version seems more likely to give you said exam whether warranted or not

[-] AlfredEinstein@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Dr. Steamboat Willie: "Take off your pants and put them on the chair with mine."

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣... got me laughing so hard i woke up my wife in bed 🤣

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

Did she enjoy the comment as much as you did?

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Of course not... weirdos never get satisfaction.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 5 months ago

It's hard being a weirdo...

[-] ahriboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 5 months ago

Let me clarify, only the Steamboat Willie version of Mickey Mouse characters are in public domain, not the recent versions as Disney holds the copyright. In a few years, more Mickey Mouse shorts will become public domain.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Personally, I don't give a shit about whether Mickey Mouse is copyrighted or not. What I care about is all the other works that were kept from entering the public domain because Disney was constantly getting copyright extended.

[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

What's funny is that Disney built their empire largely on public-domain works (such as fairy tales), but when it's their turn to give back, they fight it tooth and nail. Classic getting to the top and then pulling up the ladder behind you.

[-] detalferous@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I've heard an argument that a reason why Disney has pushed Steamboat Willie lately (new intro for Disney Animation films, and a lot of merch) is because copyright law works differently from trademark law. They can still claim a trademark even if the copyrighted work is in public domain. I'm not a lawyer, but if that's not all BS, I don't think we have to worry about anything like this anytime soon.

[-] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 11 points 5 months ago

I am a lawyer, and that is correct. You can use old Mickey for general purposes, but not as a mark.

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Meeh, it's just a joke. It would be an aimmediate downer for me if I was a fisrt time xfce user.

[-] DaBPunkt@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

AFAIK you can only claim a trademark-violation if someone is (for example) selling stuff (so you couldn’t sell stuffed animals that look like an early Mickey for example).

[-] Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com 4 points 5 months ago

A trademark just has to be "used in commerce as a mark". In layman's terms, that basically means distributing goods or services with it as a logo or a name. A stuffed animal could be infringement, but using something a logo for your software is much closer to the classic infringement fact pattern.

[-] Null@pawb.social 13 points 5 months ago

Love this and now I'm expecting wallpapers for my xfce build.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I get it ... but idk if I want Disney on my mind when thinking about xfce

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 1 points 5 months ago

XFCE is the Mickey Mouse under the desktop environments?

[-] 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

I hope not...

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
636 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

19214 readers
1375 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS