this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
226 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

88234 readers
3246 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhosMansIsThis@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

This does not whip the Llamas ass.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is a whole enshitification process right there. After a few months Deezer will start removing content that you will have access to over the winamp subscription, or winamp will pull an Amazon and insert ads into the paid subscription, call it basic subscription, and ask for more money for premium without ads.

Fuck this, I'm fine with my navidrome.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All while selling your personal data because you agreed to that when it was buried in that giant EULA/Privacy policy/etc. that you didn't read

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What? No, I read every single part of them...

Said no-one ever 🤣🤣

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lol yep.

Though lately I just give the URL to an AI to read and call out red flags. Sometimes there's an email address buried in the legalese to opt out of data sharing (and the LLM can draft an email to copy-paste). Though, at that point, I've usually lost too much trust in the service and find alternatives.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yo…..ho…..

Edit. Jokes aside I am with you. I still have my mp3s that I ripped from 20+ years ago. The best thing to do is go back to physical media.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

I've been looking for a solid DAP for my car playing and afternoon walks, bit those things, at least the good ones, are super expensive. Still, better than paying for subscriptions though.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago

as a streaming service... That really sucks the llama's ass.

[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago

You're bringing back everyone's favourite free pirated mp3 player as a subscription service.. why?

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Winamp will be reborn

No. No, it won't.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 154 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

It's dead already, then. WinAmp's heritage was providing a free audio player. I was looking forward to a refreshed build to test out, but I won't pay for it.

There are a dozen better, free, maintained, and actively developed players out there. This is less than too little, and far too late. Those of us who used winamp back when it was still activly developed will continue to have nostalgia for it, but I bet it will be DOA to most of the target audience.

I've only kept up on news for it because I was hoping it would be reborn true to itself. I have zero interest in it as a subscription model.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

it appears to be just an added optional feature, a winamp-branded deezer subscription and client, with the traditional local play and customization and what-not still part of the 'free' program (presumably.. details are scarce).

but.. i left winamp years ago. i won't go back. i have playlists sorted and can just use vlc these days. idc about customizing or visualizations and that shit. i just want a player to sit in the background and do its thing. there's dozens of acceptable programs without a subscription sales pitch built in.

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Unlike traditional digital streaming platforms, the new Winamp Player will not be limited to music streaming. It will seamlessly combine premium streaming with users' local music libraries, internet radio stations, podcasts, personal cloud-based collections and other audio sources, while introducing a highly customizable interface, new social capabilities and innovative ways to discover, organize and enjoy music.

Source https://www.engadget.com/2259236/winamp-coming-back-2027-deezer-partnership-streaming-music/

It sounds like the local playback is the "optional" feature. That's still gonna be a no, at least for me. Fpr Hifi, I'll stick with FooBar2k, or something that is a proper hi-res FLAC player first and has bolt-ons/plugins second. The same article also links to another, they actually already released a new build of classic winamp a few years ago.

https://www.engadget.com/winamp-mp3-player-software-returns-191027227.html

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"To take on streaming"

In a partnership with Deezer, Winamp will be reborn as a completely new player with its own premium subscription service, with Deezer providing the white-label streaming technology and licensed catalog.

So, basically a nostalgic skin for Deezer.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 18 points 3 days ago (3 children)

And Deezer is owned by a Russian Oligarch who was personally sanctioned by Ukraine for profiting off of the war.

This is not the Winamp you're looking for.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

owned by a Russian Oligarch

TIL

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, pissed me off when another lemming informed me cos I had left Spotify for deezer because Spotify basically joined the evil big tech club.

Only one that doesn't seemed to have evil ownership is qobuz... Which I have now, but I hate it.

I don't hit the high seas myself, but sometimes it sounds like the only sane choice. ☠️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nafzib@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Someone already revived Winamp in the best way years ago with Winamp 2.0 in a browser, complete with all the skins they could salvage: https://webamp.org/

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Underappreciated work. Note that you can drag-n-drop your own music and listen it there!

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 79 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The MP3 era’s favorite player returns with a monthly subscription.

The sub-subtitle says enough that you should just look elsewhere.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] modus@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Winamp: It really IS the llama's ass.

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would I choose it over VLC?

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

Because it really whips the llamas ass!

[–] jackintosh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

Winamp’s got a certain “je ne sais quoi”, … style? Personality?

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 39 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

All I want is a simple, nostalgic media player.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

Another subscription thing. Sad.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 3 days ago

These owners are just whatever lawyers have gotten ahold of the WinAMP trademark.

Anybody remember when they attempted to push out the source code for WinAMP on GitHub and failed miserably? Or included NFTs?

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Last time I heard about a Winamp reboot it was a Bandcamp ripoff with added cryptoslop. While this seems marginally better it's still pretty disappointing.

Deezer seems alright as a streaming service, though, and they're French so there's that.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago

I just realized it doesn't even need to be reborn to "take on streaming." Y'all with home servers and a big music collection can just start hosting Shoutcasts again and we can use the OG Winamp to stream. :P

[–] moendopi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand the point of this. Strawberry Player exists. Shortwave exists. I miss the old Zune Player. Mais, c'est la vie, non?

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's probably just nostalgia, but honestly it never hurts to have more choice.

We have too many companies that keep consolidating and leaving users with little or no alternative for products and or software.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

For real, Winamp had a great run. Stop ruining it.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Again. Anyone remember Shoutcast?

Anyway, the old versions of Winamp work just fine for playing your local library.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Anyone else still use Foobar2000?

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Wait. Didn’t it already get rebooted?

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 15 points 3 days ago

Winamp revived: nostalgia tickled!

Subscription warning! Go fuck yourself!

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I have the feeling the new version's tagline will be something along the lines of

"WINAMP, IT REALLY SUCKS THE LLAMA'S CORPORATE COCK!"

[–] db2@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

After the "open source" fakeout that was nothing more than them trying to get free work without actually opening the source code for anyone to use, Winamp and Llamasoft or whatever their name is can get bent by an elephant.

I won't even use an old copy in Wine at this point. They fucked up repeatedly and now nostalgia isn't what it used to be. Get fucked, losers of Winamp.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Will be reborn? If they had actually released Winamp under a real open source licence, it would have been reborn years ago! A bit late for it now!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Winamp isn't even good. There are much better media players. Use Strawberry.

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haven't heard of this one yet, they've got downloads for Linux, will have to try it out. Thanks!

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's the best I've used. Hope you like it :)

[–] grahamja@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

VLC? Foobar2000? I liked winamp.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I liked Winamp too. It hasn't aged well. I'm amazed people use VLC for music. I know you can, but there's better software out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

WinAmp was already reborn as Wacup though?

https://getwacup.com/

[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 9 points 3 days ago

Who needs it? Audacious + Winamp skin.

load more comments
view more: next ›