!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
I found a popular thread from the day of 9/11 here if you want to look at it: https://m.slashdot.org/story/20235
Most of it isn't all that different from what you would see today but I should warn you that there are some "edgy humor" trolls using slurs that you'll run into early on.
Joke about Linux use being the reason was funny though morbid.
For people who only know the internet past 2010, the 2001 internet would be unrecognizable, so the question doesn't really make sense. The world was an entirely different place before modern algorithmic media. There were trolls, and there were decent people, but the whole context of the world changed after the emergence of Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc. Arguably for the orders of magnitude worse. It's not really fair to compare then to now.
Correct. There was no reddit or Lemmy like things. The closest we had were BBS forums.
I was a mod on a pretty major one: IGN, and it was definitely dark after that happened. Not many posts at all. People all just unplugged from the internet for a bit to watch the news. Which was the style at the time.
There just wasn't really user-submitted content back then. If you wanted to post something on the internet, you had to create a website.
There were tools that made a website a bit easier to create (most notably Geocities), but it was still a fairly technical task to simply get text that you typed show up on a website accessible to all.
Simply being able to reply to someone else? That wasn't really on the web, although by 2001 there were a few attempts to bring that kind of forum functionality to the broader web on actual http/www webpages (when it was previously on Usenet and BBSes and mailing lists and the technologies known as the internet before and separate from the world wide web). vBulletin was the popular one, and I think phpBB was fairly popular, too, but those projects started in 2000 and weren't that popular in the first years. Web hosts actually offering a full blown LAMP stack (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) for hosting, and the technical skills to administer that kind of service, even on free software, was a pretty big hurdle to adoption before 2003 or so.
In 2001, almost all of the web was static content, with no method of interacting with the content other than simply viewing it. You'd click on links to retrieve another piece of content. By 2005 the web 2.0 revolution was underway, and websites had become interactive, with dynamic content drawing from relational databases under the hood. But in 2001? No, the web was pretty static.
Your description of the rise of the social algorithms is part of the story since 2010, but even that leaves out the period of time in between.
laughs in IRC
Fark.com was around. People were definitely less trolly right after, for a bit.
It destroyed my friend group. One person was angry at basically all Arabic people, and her racism started lots of fights. I couldn't get through to her, and didn't know how to handle it. Everyone had a different reaction. We all just stopped talking.
Someone made a Flash animation with the Counterstrike HUD playing the win audio "Terrorists Win" to a photo of the World Trade Center right after both planes hit.
There just wasn't a Facebook to post it to.
Generally, people weren't dicks or trolls online quite as much at the time. The internet wasn't for everyone in 2001. Most people got their news from TV. I had a family member call me to turn on the TV.
The lack of decency part was how quickly the anti-Arab sentiment came out of the woodwork. With a lot of people still sort of attuned to it from the first Iraq war, it was easy for a lot of people to fall back into that. Tons of racist cartoons and photoshoped images sent around, mostly by email. Lots of email forwards. To be fair, people were extremely pissed, and since it was not a nation-state doing this, it was hard to have someone to blame in the traditional sense.
But, in general, people were more shocked and terrified. Especially as the anthrax stuff happened a few weeks later, rampant speculation and conspiracy theories ramped up. All of that "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" started within days. A lot of "woah, I can't believe it" stuff. It took a few days before things got back to normal.
More than a few days, more like months. One could argue that things haven't returned to "normal" ever since.
The Internet was already a very different place back then. These days, most people are on a few very large platforms. Back then it was a lot of smaller sites and forums, whose individual vibes depended a lot on its own moderation policies.
I spent much of that day with other players of the MUD-style game I played at the time, figuratively huddling together, sharing updates about our people in NYC as we heard from them.
For a time, I think, people were kind of stunned. The US had thought itself invulnerable, you understand.
But it wasn't very long before the raging islamophobia began, and a hard turn toward the direction of fascism. But also the reaction to that. The split was stark.
And is still going on to this day, I suppose.
So no, people didn't quite stop being dicks. If anything they only started dicking harder.
It was truly impressive how niche forums and start-up websites coalesced to support an anti-war movement that brought 300-400k people to New York (and similar numbers in cities globally) to protest the invasion of Iraq.
Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER) was one such focal group.
Interestingly it still largely felt organic and spread by word of mouth. With no real social media to amplify or mute.
The discourse today feels much more controlled. And the powers globally continue to manipulate internet discourse increasingly.
Despite millions collectively protesting globally- a coalition of the willing invaded a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 using the tragedy to support the globalist ambitions of the father and his cadre
Many of us warned about the knee jerk reactions of our government, especially usapatriot and the kickoff of the wars. Same shit. Different decade. But it laid much of the groundwork for the hole we are in today.
Social media didn't exist for the most part in 2001. There was LiveJournal and Something Awful. Most online discussions happened using instant messaging between people you knew or on discussion forums that usually were focused around an interest or niche topic.
All of those platforms had trolls but they were much more benign than they are today. Islamophobia spiked and there were spirited debates, but nothing like the vitriol we see today on even the most banal posts. The communities were much smaller to the point that most regular posters knew each other and had interacted many times, civility was maintained by that familiarity like it would be in a real community. The anonymity that comes from massive userbases were you'll never encounter the same person twice is really what created the naked hostility we have today. There was a forum called Storm Front, which I believe is still around, a literal nazi forum but you had to be deep into the Internet to even know it existed.
After 9/11 more conspiracy theories started popping up and making their way to more mainstream sites as sort of proto-memes and it was a bad time to hold an opinion that wasn't pro-US nationalism, but again nothing like the horrific things we see today.
People stopped being dicks and trolls for about 24-48 hours. The came a flood of really dark 9/11 jokes. Essentially any 9/11 joke was already though of within the first week.
I remember seeing a video (from a digital camera, not a phone), probably turned into a gif, of three or four friends on Halloween.
Two were dressed as towers. One (or maybe two) were of planes.
The ones dressed as planes were running into the ones dressed as towers.
So only like a month and a half after 9/11, and anyone posting it to forums usually titled it "too soon?"
Yeah, that was about right. Some of my younger, more moronic friends were making these same kinds of jokes pretty much right away. You know the type, trying to show how cool they were with being edgy. I was already working two full time jobs at the time when this happened so I was kind of in a daze at the actual moment of 9/11. I was more mad that I knew it would be used as an excuse to pass a bunch of bad laws that would screw over everyone and that was right on the money.
Found this interesting Pew study about the internet from 1 year after 9/11:
https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2002/09/05/one-year-later-september-11-and-the-internet-2/
Take it with a grain of salt, I think it comes off as a little overly optimistic, especially given some of the dire things it talks about (massive support for giving away our freedoms, etc).
I did just see at the bottom that there's literally 8 pages, and I was basing all that on just the first page so maybe I'll read more or at least skim through the rest.
Edit: holy shit (from pg 2):
Aside from the outcome, it's crazy that in 2001 there were still enough "Internet non-users" to make gathering data on them statistically significant
I was a moderator (we didn’t call it that) at an online chess server, with live chat. When the attacks happened, people started to talk about it. At first I tried to moderate them, sending them to appropriate chat rooms, but soon the admins told me these were special circumstances and to just let people talk.
What was especially strange for me was that I might’ve been among the first people in my neck of the woods to hear about it. People were not chronically online at the time - I just happened to be online, and in a live chat environment with Americans, so I heard about it that way. When I turned on the TV, there was nothing yet. I kept switching between channels, and finally CNN was the first to interrupt their programming for a special bulletin, followed quickly by BBC. Other channels followed a bit later.
As for the conversations online, I mostly remember shock, and later fear of what this might start. Jokes and memes came later.
Oh wow, you just reminded me that this was the beginning of "all day all night all the time news".
Pre 9/11 I don't think it existed (I wasn't really watching the news), but day of, as more and more information came in, they just kept updating when they had new news and reiterating what they had when there wasn't anything new.
I don't know about the day of, because I was downtown in NYC. I didn't get home to the Bronx until about ten at night.
But I was on Metafilter and a couple of other fora. But these were already mostly asshole free places, so few dicks or tolls as per OP.
The whole day - hell the next two weeks - updates of news and speculation about the ratfuckery this would cause dominated the chat/posts.
Americans were turbo racist is all i remember
Performative patriotism
I believe the internet was much smaller then. It existed, but most social hadn't really begun yet. I still only had dialup.
9/11 was 2001, Facebook was 2004. So definitely a different place.
We had a lot of fourms back then. Myspace wouldn't happen until '03.
I don't count forums the same as modern social media. The are social places of course, but much more tight-knit, much less algorithmically ratfucked. Even 2003 Myspace and 2004 FB were much better places than what they have metastasized into.
Broadband was around. The signal to noise was much better. We had Usenet, IRC, and our own home pages.
Maybe around, but I don't think it was ubiquitous? Even then, ADSL was pretty bad, and I wouldn't call it broadband by today's standards. But that could just be Australia lagging the world :)
I remember there were a lot of memes about it, most of them were incredible islamophobic or in bad taste with the victims.
From what I remember, just from small niche forums, most people were just too stunned about it to really be hateful. That’s not a big sample size but I don’t recall many people trying to be edgelords about it, everyone just seemed to read the room and just see that it was fucked up
This isn't true, there were racist fucks immediately targeting Sikhs.
People were literally killed in retaliatory attacks (that often targeted the wrong fucking religion).
The question asked “on the internet” and I responded with my personal experience. Take it down a notch.
I didn't realize I was up any notches. Maybe it is you who needs to take your defensiveness down a notch.
Also, hate speech went way up online after 9/11. Just because you didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't there.
Edit:
I posted a top level comment with a pretty interesting Pew research article, this chart is on page 6.
Over half of the sites in the study had a tenor of "anger, fear and hate." More than the "nonviolent response" cohort. I also wonder what % of the "religious expression" ones were Islamophobic
Source:
Edit: to be clear, these comments are about as dispassionate as I can get, I'm honestly not sure why anyone would interpret it otherwise.
You need a healthier outlet
Why are you taking all of this so personal?
While I was already reading through what I found to be an interesting study Pew did 1 year after 9/11 about the internet,
(Quite literally the exact topic that OP was asking about)
I took 30 sec to screenshot a relevant chart.
I dunno man, doesn't seem unhealthy to me. Found an interesting article about the thing we were discussing here and thought that I'd share. That took me literally 30 sec to screenshot the chart from the article I was already reading.
The problem here seems to lie with you.
Nothing to do with the internet; I was in elementary at the time and we were joking about it within 2 weeks.
Yeah I’ll say “happy holidays” now but on the day of, I was just too aghast to be edgy or really even react cos it was so surreal
Reddit and other big social media didn't exist yet, but there were plenty of jokes in the chat for Counter-Strike and other multiplayer games at the time. It wasn't even talked about much on the forums I frequented at the time. But I never paid for Something Awful, which was the biggest one around. Maybe it was discussed there.
The Internet was awesome before 9/11/01
Now any idiot can use it.
The death of the Internet started in 2004, when Facebook launched, and fucking died in 2007 when the iPhone launched.
~~The Endless Summer~~ Eternal September began in ~~the late 80s and early 90s...~~ 1993.
2001, dint really have an internet per ce, forums dint really exist in large numbers yet. the biggest news aggregate dint exist for another half a decade. . reddit dint really take off til 2010-16ish. there was a news aggregate forum that existed in the late 2000s, got replaced by reddit, and Y/answers.
There was usenet.
Dude there were way more online forums in 2000 than there are now.
I belonged to many movie message boards, gaming boards and etc. Its all consolidated and controlled now.
Wasn't really on the internet back then, but we joked about it in school the very next day.
It wasn’t anywhere near as big a shift as 2016 when we realised that a lot of the people doing ironic nazi jokes were not, in fact, joking about having awful nazi beliefs. I was mostly on UK forums and IRC in 2001 though - the Americans would never have tolerated anything less than a reverential tone. There was a lot of conspiracy talk and concerns about further attacks and conflicts breaking out.
No idea, I only used the internet for messenger with people I knew irl
one satirical website summarized it like this: https://inadequacy.org/public/stories/2001.9.12.102423.271.html