this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
335 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

87896 readers
3919 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/51634640

A new Gamers Nexus investigation found a retail LG TV actively scanning the local network for phones, laptops, smartwatches and other connected devices, while also capturing microphone audio when the screen appeared to be in standby. The investigation found voice data being stored locally even after the TV was disconnected from the network, with the queued data uploaded once connectivity returned. Researchers also uncovered webOS vulnerabilities that could potentially turn the television into a remotely controlled surveillance device. The really unsettling part isn't just the advertising angle. It's the fact that a consumer television can sit inside your trusted network, enumerate other devices, access a microphone, store collected data locally and communicate with external infrastructure. Put that same device in a corporate office, hospital, hotel or conference room and the security implications become considerably more serious. I went through the investigation in detail, including the network scanning, microphone behavior, ACR, webOS attack surface, offline data collection and practical mitigations

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

If you are going to have smart devices, put them on their own VLAN. They should not have access to the rest of your network. TVs shouldn't be connected at all. Use a PC or android box if you want to stream stuff.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 2 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

The issue in this case is that they apparently use text to speech locally, store that information on the device itself, and then if at any point in the future gets connected to the internet for any meaningful length of time (be it by a subsequent owner) it will then be sent on to LG.. for safekeeping of course /s

The deep-dive by GamersNexus is pretty in depth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Really makes one wonder...How many fucking data points do these assholes need telling them we're too fucking broke for their game and want their heads on pikes?

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Enough that they can tell with a decent amount of certainty whose social credit score should be lowered, once that gets inevitably introduced /s

(I don't think that conspiratorially.. It's probably just data harvesting and extreme greed.)

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My LG TV is blocked from my network and always has been. However, the andriod tv connected to it is a different thing, so it's more or less lost cause anyways and I haven't had enough incentive to block the android box from the rest of network since it'd need some tweaking so that casting and other occasionally used features still work. And even if I'd block the android tv box there's still our cellphones gathering all the data, so I'm pretty much just running things on hopium that EU offers at least some protection on my data.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well, if you watch the Gamer Nexus video, you'll see that even if you don't connect your tv to the internet, you're still not safe.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I haven't watched the video, but how can an offline TV transmit its data to the mothership?

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If I understood correctly, the tv can connect to open networks it finds and transmit data even if you disable wifi.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 33 minutes ago

Mine is several years old by now, I doubt that the firmware on that has all the options enabled. And also I live in a pretty rural area, there's no open networks around.

But something LG has achieved with this, I'm going to look for other brands when I'm on a market for new TV. Which I hope will be many years in the future, maybe there's a change on products while waiting and something better is available by then.

[–] micka190@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

It'll scan for open networks and use them, regardless of whether you enabled wifi or not.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 80 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Don't connect TVs to your network.

[–] lIlIlIlIl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

This is the only correct answer. Discussion over.

[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 42 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And according to the article the data collection runs even if it's disconnected. So, don't ever connect it to the network. As soon as you do everything gets uploaded.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

how is it collecting and sending data if not connected to a network?

i read the article, it still needs a connection

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (7 children)

This would've worked just a few years back but due to shitty "age verification" laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up. They may also implement an always-online model and they'll justify that it's necessary to monitor users for "age verification purposes". ATP better to get a good monitor and use it as TV cuz cable or satellite boxes are either way gonna be provided by the network companies so that's there

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This would’ve worked just a few years back but due to shitty “age verification” laws, even TV manufacturers willl force users to create an account the very least for the TV to even start up.

Surely only for "smart" features but without enabling any of that shit, you shouldn't get any age verification prompt.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I could see them doing it anyway as OTA broadcasts include rating data.

That said, if it's a family TV, you're never going to put everyone on it, just the oldest one anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

It’s not just LG. It’s all of them.

And, the cheaper the TV, the more often and intrusive these settings are.

It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It’s honestly better to just have a bare wall and a projector.

Consumer projectors come with the same "smart" shit as TVs these days. Just don't connect either to WiFi. Problem solved.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

Apparently not solved. They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

Per the marketing chief at LG; (paraphrased, from memory) "we own the glass, and we know everything beyond the glass."

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

They can connect to open (and hidden) networks without your consent.

That's a wild claim and either I accidentally skipped a paragraph in the article or you should cite a source. Quick googling doesn't show up anything of that sort for me.

[–] undrwater@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

I'm looking for a source as well. The "apparently" I used was supposed to cover the whole comment, but I can see how it didn't.

The video goes into detail, and could be staged, but comments seem to support the idea anyway.

Amazon devices are known to do this with other Amazon products to create a mesh.

It's not outside the realm of possibility.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 25 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I was at my parent’s house, trying to add some items to the smart TV. They started listening to these awful AI interpersonal dramas read by AI, on YouTube.

My thought was to add some podcasts and their Audible account, for more selections. Maybe they’ll still only listen to that, even so. You can’t add much to a smart tv. No podcasts. No podcast app. A pretty spartan selection of apps. Even something as large and mainstream as Audible. No go. Libby? Yeah, right.

I don’t get it. What’s the point? Just buy a monitor, jack it into a PC for media, and have everything you want minus this telemetry.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

jack it into a PC for media

Even a proprietary streaming stick like FireTV would be an improvement because it only collects telemetry from the stick itself and not devices connected to other HDMI ports.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just buy a monitor, jack it into a PC for media, and have everything you want minus this telemetry.

I have some bad news for you:

LG monitors installing McAfee ads on Windows

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Ah doesn't matter. Dont use windows. Use a pi and something like LibreELEC or even you can run debloated android on it with the TV interface and a remote. Just get a BT remote or an IR receiver plug into the usb port. Either of them are pretty cheap

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

My TV has no Internet connection, but does connect to my gaming desktop. I agree with you. There’s no reason TVs should not just be dumb displays. I do also have the Apple TV, but it never ever shows ads and is a one-time purchase. The day it starts showing me ads is the day it meets the bin.

[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

Fingers crossed the new Apple TV box is announced this week, I am waiting to finally switch over

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 hours ago

There’s no reason TVs should not just be dumb displays.

At least, no reason that benefits the consumer. There are strong monetary incentives to spy on customers and sell the data that's collected.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Bosch fucking dishwashers do this, once connected there is no way to disconnect them so I sink all its outgoing traffick at the router level

Complete garbage

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, what kind of idiot wants an internet-connected dishwasher?

How about an AI-powered pair of chopsticks?

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 5 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

In a perfect world?

I'd love access to diagnostic data. Is the filter starting to clog? Is any part not working as intended? I'm a big fan of preventative maintenance, but also really bad at sticking to an arbitrary recurring schedule (e.g., clean the filter every 6 months). This could also be accomplished with Bluetooth and an offline-only app on the phone.

In the real world? Nobody provides this, and the privacy risks aren't worth it.

I do have my dishwasher on a ZigBee power meter to 1) track energy use and 2) give me a good-enough estimate of time remaining by starting a 2h timer after it starts.

[–] UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

You CAN do this with a few products of diff companies with the help of home assistant and plugins BUT many companies are pulling off support OR restricting features to its own app and giving free access to the bare minimum voa protocols like matter and all. I read somewhere on reddit that a robovac company had matter access technically but only the vac on off switch access was there and none of the other basic functions. For that you need their app. But again, still some companies do support all it's features on home assistant. Many light fixtures, switches, ACs and much more support it. So yes you can run them locally BUT it all depends on the manufacturer how much control they are willing to provide openly

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

This could also be accomplished with Bluetooth and an offline-only app on the phone.

But WHY! If those diags are important, then just put them in the local display of the machine itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why would you connect a dishwasher to the internet? Setting a timer can tell you just as well if the dishes are clean.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] redkid1324@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

I need to get my network and vlans setup sooner rather than later.

load more comments
view more: next ›