this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2026
6 points (60.7% liked)

Technology

43530 readers
108 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Picture humanity in a boat being swept down a raging river, praying there is no Niagara Falls ahead. Or imagine standing with the pioneering physicists in 1942 before they triggered the first self-sustaining nuclear fission chain reaction beneath a Chicago stadium.

These were two of the analogies used this week by Prof Robert Trager, an expert in the nascent field of AI governance, to describe the perilous but potential-filled moment the world stands at with accelerating artificial intelligence.

Trager, the director of the Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative, was speaking in the week OpenAI claimed the technology had crossed the threshold known as AGI – artificial general intelligence – with its newest model, GPT-6 Astra.

That claim came as the company prepared for a potential $850bn (£630bn) stock flotation, so included a dose of marketing spin, but if true it may be significant. The San Francisco company defines AGI as “autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work”.

The tasks it claims Astra can automate include designing circuit boards, filling out tax returns, building video games, financial modelling, engineering design and helping assemble legal documents. The threat to some white-collar jobs is implicit.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Hopefully it takes over some dangerous hardware and gives them a lesson.

[–] TheMightyCat@ani.social 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Company that is set to make a huge amount of money from hyping up its product hypes up its product, experts shocked.

I'm not sure what annoys me more, the AI companies making these grandiose claims or the media giving them the attention for it.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Remember when Claude Mythos/Fable was the end of the world?

I guess you can't end the world if the world already ended in 2012.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago

I remember when GPT2 was "too dangerous to release" back in 2019. Funny how Sam Altman released it anyway.

[–] halm@leminal.space 29 points 2 days ago

LOL, no. The "AI" peddlers have made these outrageous claims from the start that "this time next week, our crazy advanced autocorrect will be, like, starting WWIII". It's predictable hype, and complete lies.

Uncontrollable "AI" users, on the other hand? People are using these BS machines without a lick of responsibility. Be afraid of your idiot employer, not "AI".

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure...because the artificial general intelligence is right around the corner and just another update away. And it will totally transform the world while making all those stupid plebs requiring wages (or even sick days, vacations, or health care - oh, the horror!) obsolete.

Or at least that's the totally insane myth they are trying to sell because nothing less will ever justify the insane amount of money they pumped in that stupid bubble.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

:sigh: no, its not getting "uncontainable" they need you to believe its "so smart its breaking out" so stock will grow

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

More like, they need you to believe it's dangerous so they have another thing for the police state to take away your rights to "protect" you from.

[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Saying humanity is "being swept down a raging river" is spot on, except it's an analogy for basically everything except GAI.

Climate change, rampant fascism, unrestrained capitalism, take your pick. We're speeding towards 3 or 4 dystopias but a super intelligent AI isn't one of them.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

It's almost suspiciously convenient that politicians are being lobbied into demanding "killswitches" for the one thing that already has a killswitch built in, but not for the things that actually need them

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think It's incredibly hard to predict where this is going and at what rate. Public sentiment is largely biased based on AI hate..

"Dumb" agents given too much power could do an untold amount of damage already, we wouldn't even need further breakthroughs. For example I can totally imagine that some degree of Ai control could act as a trigger for the Kessler effect, this is plausible today.

[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 3 points 2 days ago

These statistical models are not capable of that. They are capable of self reinforcing s feedback loop of looking malicious but it's ultimately just how the numbers align and has nothing to do with actual intent.