this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
45 points (100.0% liked)

news

24876 readers
580 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Surprisingly this was written by a REPUBLICAN. Not what I'd expect but hey, if it means next time some lady threatens to stab a Starbucks barista for not putting enough caramel in her Frappuccino she gets fined out the ass I'm for it.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm for anything that protects customer facing workers. It would be better to mandate direct compensation for any harmed workers though and not just punishment for perpetrators.

[–] Auphorus@hexbear.net 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This bill seems suspicious. Like of course retail and food workers should be treated better by customers, but this bill was made by republicans and is in Louisiana (a southern state of vicious racists and lost causers); it will certainly be used against black people overwhelmingly and might even be a tool to funnel more Hispanic people too ICE. Louisiana is also a major user of prison labor (slave labor under the 13th amendment); any bill that increases criminalization, even for good reasons, should be opposed under such circumstances.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah this feels off. When was the last time these assholes legitimately had any empathy for retail/food workers?

On paper this seems like a good thing, but the source makes it incredibly suspicious.

[–] FemboyStalin@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

People are frustrated at these corporations blowing them off and treating them like shit. And the only parts of those close enough to swing and hit are the lowest paid workers. This will be used in racist ways for sure. But this is also the state thinking they have enough security that they can put a cap on a current outlet of pressure/catharsis.

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago

It's exclusively going to be used against minorities

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Knowing Louisiana, I'm going to assume there's a stand-your-ground provision for shooting "shoplifters" and "robbers" on sight who don't pass the us-foreign-policy test, at least until proven otherwise.

I may be a tad cynical.

[–] someone@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

That's exactly what I was thinking.

someone remind this guy who enforces the laws

[–] regul@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

More people in jail for longer => more prison labor or money for private prisons

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago

I assume it's to make shoplifting carry a harsher penalty

[–] TUMBLE_BUS@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago

None that I'm aware of but wouldn't be surprised if there is one

[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I spent more than fifteen years in jobs covered by this bill. I’m unclear as to why I someone assailing me should get a worse penalty than if they were hitting the person running a forklift or behind a non customer facing desk somewhere.

[–] TUMBLE_BUS@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People in those positions are less likely to face direct customer hostility shrug-outta-hecks

Idk, I think making the penalty steeper for people attack some of the most common victims of this abuse could have a deterring effect.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

stiffer penalties have negligible effect on crime

actually getting caught does

Louisiana is the most incarcerated state in the nation (which makes it one of, if not the, most-incarcerated place on earth). Longer sentences just means more people in jail for longer to pick cotton at Angola.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

stiffer penalties have negligible effect on crime

on petty interpersonal crime and heat of the moment rages. I'm all for legal torturous deaths for financial criminals or the Sacklers.