this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
95 points (92.8% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

3161 readers
144 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 15 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I haven't used substack, but I've never heard any negative discourse about it either. A lot of Nazis on there I guess?

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Substack faced further criticism in November 2023 for allowing its platform to be used by white nationalists, Nazis, and antisemites.[61] In an open letter, more than 100 Substack creators threatened to leave the platform[62] and implored Substack's leadership to stop giving bigotry a platform.[63] In response, Substack co-founder Hamish McKenzie said the company would continue to allow the publication of extremist views because attempting to censor them would make the problem worse.[11][64]

From their Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substack

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 4 points 16 hours ago

I don't know much about Substack, but there are some killer blogs there. For example Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's.

https://kareem.substack.com/

[–] nigel@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm curious too, is this about the owners or the writers?

[–] pieberry@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

The CEO did an interview on The Verge with Nilay Patel and refused to say that he would take Nazi content off the platform, taking an 'absolute free-speech, nothing is censored' approach.

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

But I have no idea how many nazis post on Substack.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

No tolerance for intolerance is a principle which he seems to be whiffing on. Or maybe it's as simple as significantly more profit for him by turning a blind eye.

[–] tquid@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Suppose I've heard a lot of talk trashing Substack, but what alternatives exist?

As a non-user who doesn't do much of anything in that space, seems like they're one of the few ways to distribute newsletters and such to emails en masse.

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Other options include Ghost, Beehiv, Wordpress, Blogger, self-publishing, on and on. Nobody's forced to hang out with Nazis; it's a choice.

[–] ArgentRaven@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Do you mean x.com? Because someone registered the expired Twitter name and is building Twitter.now as a replacement for What the old Twitter became.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago

Yeah but it's just another corpo take. They basically came right out and said we got investors, we got a business plan, we wanna make some money.

[–] Spider89@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I've just heard of Substack, what's wrong with it?

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Substack has a Nazi problem

The newsletter-hosting site Substack advertises itself as the last, best hope for civility on the internet—and aspires to a bigger role in politics in 2024. But just beneath the surface, the platform has become a home and propagator of white supremacy and anti-Semitism. Substack has not only been hosting writers who post overtly Nazi rhetoric on the platform; it profits from many of them.

[–] pieberry@lemmy.today 3 points 16 hours ago

The CEO did an interview on The Verge with Nilay Patel and refused to say that he would take Nazi content off the platform, taking an 'absolute free-speech, nothing is censored' approach.

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Nothing as far as I know. It has some of the most thoughtful news / opinion channels I've read. But OP seems to hate it per their bio.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Spider89@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago

Oh, majority are Nazis..