this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
95 points (92.8% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

3161 readers
144 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 15 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

I haven't used substack, but I've never heard any negative discourse about it either. A lot of Nazis on there I guess?

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Substack faced further criticism in November 2023 for allowing its platform to be used by white nationalists, Nazis, and antisemites.[61] In an open letter, more than 100 Substack creators threatened to leave the platform[62] and implored Substack's leadership to stop giving bigotry a platform.[63] In response, Substack co-founder Hamish McKenzie said the company would continue to allow the publication of extremist views because attempting to censor them would make the problem worse.[11][64]

From their Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substack

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 4 points 16 hours ago

I don't know much about Substack, but there are some killer blogs there. For example Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's.

https://kareem.substack.com/

[–] nigel@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm curious too, is this about the owners or the writers?

[–] pieberry@lemmy.today 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

The CEO did an interview on The Verge with Nilay Patel and refused to say that he would take Nazi content off the platform, taking an 'absolute free-speech, nothing is censored' approach.

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

But I have no idea how many nazis post on Substack.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The common sentiment is that refusing to take down Nazi content makes one complicit and supportive of Nazis.

No tolerance for intolerance is a principle which he seems to be whiffing on. Or maybe it's as simple as significantly more profit for him by turning a blind eye.