this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
1048 points (98.6% liked)

Comic Strips

25192 readers
1880 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. πŸ˜‡ Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. πŸ“½οΈ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. πŸ“‹ Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      βœ… Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. πŸ“¬ Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 πŸ–) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 πŸ–) will be removed.
  7. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      SΓ­, por favor [Spanish/EspaΓ±ol]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Banned Artists

The following artists are banned from the community.

  1. Jago
  2. Stonetoss
  3. GPrime85

It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.

Web Accessibility

Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.

When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:

Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)

Web of Links
Other Comic Communities of Interest

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tommy Siegel | Bluesky | website

TranscriptComic in 4 Panels:

Header: It’s That Easy!

Panel 1: The year is 1994. A dad with short black hair, in a blue shirt, red shorts, and white sneakers with calf high white socks, kneels with one arm resting on a knee and the other raised demonstratingly in front of a kid in a green ball cap, yellow shirt, blue pants, and green sneakers. There is a round metal trash can behind them.

Dad: Pick up your litter and save the Earth!

Panel 2: The year is 2004. Same dad, but in brown cargo shorts, brown shoes, and ankle high white socks speaking to the same kid. There is a green recycle bucket behind them.

Dad: Recycle and you can save the Earth!

Panel 3: The year is 2014. Same dad, but wearing a bike helmet, black athletic pants, and black sneakers to the same kid. A bike is behind them.

Dad: Reduce your carbon footprint and you can save the Earth!

Panel 4: The year is 2024. Same dad, but he’s in the same outfit from panel 1. There is a massive fire behind them.

Dad: Completely restructure global economic systems and you may be able to save a remnant of humanity!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We failed them like our parents failed us

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All generations suffer from the same issue: the system is designed so that only the narcissists make it to the top. This will repeat again for eternity if we don’t change the system, and the failure isn’t generational when we are presented with only two options that both work for the elite in some capacity.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

It will not "repeat for eternity", both our societies and the planet's ecosystems which we depend on all have breaking points after which they will not be able to sustain capitalism. We have a few decades until human civilization collapses if we don't overthrow the system.

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think a random lottery for office positions is the only system I've ever heard of which can't be abused by narcissists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The individual action PSAs were a deliberate fraud perpetrated by the worst polluters.

[–] EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Precisely. It was strategically designed and marketed to shift the blame/responsibility from manufacturers to consumers.

It was a scam and distraction from the start created by advertising agencies.

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

"If they knew that to save .03 a unit we are dumping this byproduct in the river, they would have our heads on a platter. Get the PR team in here" "Why dont we tell them its their fault for buying it in the first place, but never really blaming any specific product" "Yeah, its all their fault"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I already reduced my carbon footprint. For some reason people get really mad when I try and blow up an oil refinery to reduce theirs.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well if I could rely on people like you being on the jury, I just might be more willing.

[–] huey_m@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Jury nullification? Never heard of her!

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 108 points 1 day ago (27 children)

One of the most brilliant (and evil) tricks that big corporations have used is to shift the blame for climate change to normal people: just recycle, don't use plastic straws, and buy our COβ‚‚-neutral products, and everything will be fine!

While not unimportant, it's a very small change compared to the pollution of corporations and private jets. It's easy for them to pay lip service to the environment while the real pollution goes on unimpeded.

Environmentally inclined people feel like they do something and don't rally against the real problem. They just have to convince everyone to live like they do and the environment will be saved!

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And even worse, it split us up again because if you point that out, the environmentalists are against you too. Because everything counts. Well yes, but..

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's abusive victim blaming by psychopaths

load more comments (3 replies)

Billionaire oligarchs flying in to climate conferences every year on private jets by the thousands, where oil executives are regularly invited to give the keynote speeches, while not accomplishing anything policy-wise or binding to materially reduce the rate or impacts of climate change, is the epitome of greenwashing.

"What menial lifestyle changes should we tell our consumers to adopt this year to keep them off our backs?"

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Environmentally inclined people feel like they do something and don't rally against the real problem.

Actually we have already been lobbying and protesting and trying to change the system for decades.

The work might not be visible, but it's due to resource constraints, not because we are delusional and think that decreasing global CO2 emissions by 0.000000027% will fix the biodiversity loss.

[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Oh, I'm not saying that there are no activists anymore, just that the corporations successfully distracted large parts of the population by shifting blame to the consumers.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

tbf the solution was always the last one.

it's just that they've been stringing us along.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But that was unimaginable to those, who promoted environmentalism, at least in the west.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Great comic. Good to see this is finally starting to dawn on people.

Good news is that we're facing an incredible economic crash worse than anything we've ever seen, and the degrowth of GDP is going to be great to reduce greenhouse gasses.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Just pick up that trash and YOU'LL BE SHOT IN THE FACE BY A MASKED GROUP OF PARDONED JAN 6 TRAITORS IN ALL DIFFERENT HOMEMADE ARMY MAN COSTUMES, CHARGED WITH "ULTRA LEFT WING" TERRORISM AND DEPORTED, AS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN, WITHOUT A TRIAL, FOR WOKE MARXIST CANCEL CULTURE AND DOUBLE TRANS!!!!

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago

What was the post on lemmy earlier today? The solutions are very simple, the problem is the people profiting off keeping things broken.

[–] whereitsat@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

drawing attention to that is cool, i guess, but doesn't shed light on the underlying issue.

america loves victim blaming the individual rather than ever admitting that there's some kind of issue with the system or wealthy people.

every single house in america could be built on the edge of a cliff prone to landslides and someone would always come out of the woodwork to act like it's your own fault you bought it.

'shoulda lived in a shopping cart.'

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Isn't that the whole point of the comic? None of the advice the Dad gave to the child was ever going to solve the problem. Presumably the kid tried, and the problem just kept getting more dire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If individual behaviour didn't matter, Canada wouldn't have 307% of global per capita emissions, and the US wouldn't have 285% while Finland only has 118% and Sweden has only 71% of the world average.

I picked those European countries in particular because they're rich, have cold winters, and have a low population density in a lot of the country.

The reality is that the US and Canada are decades behind Europe when it comes to these things. Sure, this guy in panel 2 is telling his kid to recycle, but Americans never took recycling seriously. Meanwhile in Zurich you have separate bins for green glass, brown glass, clear glass, along with the normal paper and plastic. If you don't want to recycle, you can do that, but it's going to cost you. You have to buy expensive special garbage bags to throw out anything that you don't recycle.

In panel 3 the guy is shown with a bike, but less than 0.5% of people bike to work. Meanwhile, in Finland, it's about 10% of people who commute by bike.

[–] Echo5@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I loved the recycling outposts in the apartments in Korea (they even took styrofoam, probably just burned everything anyways though), but in US I asked my local politician about recycling, even said I’d pay a couple bucks extra a month in taxes for opting in, and he said it’s been tried before but people abused the system :(. Not sure what he meant by abused but now I procrastinate taking my recycling to a center until my garage is stuffed and it’s a major chore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] huey_m@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (7 children)

"Just don't use AC (during a heat wave killing thousands) and you can save the Earth!" (2026)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Also 1994, don't use ac refills that are bad for the environment. (Freon)

1984, don't use these aerosaw cans that will kill the ozone layer.

  1. Make sure you have a catalytic converter to not hurt the environment.

1964 Oil companies noted oil will have marked climate changes by 2000. (We just didn't do enough to stop it)

[–] overcast5348@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I man, the Montreal ~~product~~ protocol absolutely succeeded at protecting and eventually repairing damage to the ozone layer. So, if nothing else, that one's a win on multiple levels.

It's just that the powers that be decided that they didn't want to go through all that hassle again and the "people" decided that they were done sacrificing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)

I kinda feel like the years are all 10 too late. I definitely remember β€œreduce reuse recycle” as more of a 90s thing and the city I lived in got a recycling program around 1994. The no littering thing was already well engrained by then.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί