this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
193 points (99.0% liked)

History Memes

2909 readers
746 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Piefed.social rules.

  5. History referenced must be 20+ years old.

  6. Avoid posting AI-generated content whenever possible.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Context: the classic "power corrupts" cycle. Revolutionaries promise freedom and justice, but the second they get a taste of absolute power, they suddenly decide it's too good to give up. Castro, Lenin, Cromwell, Robespierre... they all started as "men of the people" and ended up as the very tyrants they swore to overthrow. The meme just takes that historical pattern and makes it hilariously blunt.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile Ataturk : Can you fuckers make ONE opposition party that isn't going to be full of Political Islamists so we can move to a multi-party democracy?

Dies.

Ironically in Singapore :

Lee Kuan Yew :

Please give water lah. Singapore does not want to be independent, I don't want to be Prime minister

Tunku Abdul Rahman:

Get the fuck out of Malasia.

Then LKY proceeds to run Singapore for 40+ years ~~until he dies~~, but still has regular elections... but there are harsh punishments for disobeying laws.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

The Ataturk from the Armenian genocide Young Turks party?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

No, the Atatürk that stopped Turkey from being torn to pieces by the Entente and established a secular, westernised and modern republic in the middle east.

[–] somebody_to_love@lemmy.today 52 points 1 day ago

I think this idea is exactly the metaphor that Tolkien was going after when he designed the One Ring. Gandalf and Galadriel actually say it loud: “I would try to do good but the Ring would corrupt me and I would become a tyrant”. Makes sense after he lived through two world wars and the Russian revolution.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

During their announcement that they’ll maintain absolute power themselves:

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

There are plenty of cases of this NOT being true, mostly when the person did not choose the power for themselves. Case in point: Presidents George Washington and James A. Garfield. Power doesn't corrupt; corrupt people seek power.

That being said if you guys wanted to elect me dictator I would absolutely obliterate our current oligarchy and then totally give up power voluntarily as soon as I was done :)

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Chè Guevara bucks this trend

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How exactly? Because he went and fought in different countries instead of governing in Cuba with castro, who is literally in the meme?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

The point is Che was from Argentina, helped fight and win a revolution and didn't stay around to rule, went to Bolivia and got killed continuing to fight to free people.

So yes Chè bucks the trend. What is the confusion?

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 22 hours ago

Washington: no absolute tyrannical power for me, I have absolute tyrannical power at home at my plantation that I need to get back to

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They had to kill a buttload of actual ideological revolutionaries to seize that absolute power though.

I think it is more a case of psychopaths being better at rising to the top than it has anything to do with revolutionary ideology.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah. The good ol' joke of tankies and anarchists the day after the revolution.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 1 day ago

There's no such thing as a psychopath.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Lenin the tyrant? Yeah I don't think so.

[–] fellow_human@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I agree actually, guy was very open minded. But I repost from reddit and this is the content I get Some is dumb

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

If Robespierre had absolute power he wouldn't have fallen quite so fast and easily. Also other than Castro I'm not really sure man of the people really is an appropriate label for any of them nor one they really embraced.