this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
70 points (97.3% liked)

memes

22422 readers
2388 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Totally unrelated to that line-up I just thought of just how much one high-velocity object can make an impact at times...

[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

"AI" is a tool to move towards labor post scarcity. That's all that it is. Billionaires using and owning AI is the problem. Billionaires scamming people with AI related buzzwords is the problem. BILLIONAIRES are the problem. Not AI.

Is nuclear tech a problem? No. It can be used for electricity generation. It can also be used to make bombs. The tech in itself is not a problem.

Sadly, most people on the left have taken the stance of blind opposition, without engaging in good faith arguments, without even attempting to understand the technology. These folks have opinions that range from:

  • AI is not actually "intelligence", where they try to show how it has 0 uses anywhere. These opinions are blatantly dissociated from reality, as professionals do indeed use AI to delegate a lot of tasks.
  • "AI will take our jobs, creating a permanent underclass". This is assuming that all of us live under authoritarianism. This is mostly Americans spreading their doomerism. Still a valid critique, though one that often incorrectly assumes that this new underclass will not riot and cause change through violence.
  • AI damages the environment: True, but some additional context is required. The oil industry, the transportation industry and so on causes much much more environmental damage. Coming up with valid, constructive solutions to regulate the tech industry's emissions makes sense. However, calling for total bans and moratoriums for development and research in AI is so so dumb.

Anywho, this comment is likely going to invite a lot of trolls. I won't engage with anyone not arguing in good faith.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If the technology was energy efficient that'd be one thing, but we're accelerating climate change and poisoning the planet in order to automate what are in many cases creative or intellectual jobs, not hard labor, and society isn't even seeing any gains from it. Cost of living is higher than ever, and social programs are being cut like crazy.

So who actually benefits? See OP.

You're right for the most part, but I find it hard to find much positivity.

When efficient "AI" models run locally and solve specific tasks without insane energy use, that'll be different. That's probably coming, once the bubble bursts. But the bubble isn't going to take the people who created it down with them, as usual.

Just pull a red wedding and end their insufferable lives please

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Zuck looks mortified. Wonder what he's reacting to.

[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

They were definitely doing drugs at the inauguration. Elon was fucking rolling his head around euphorically and Zuck looks like he sees a Smurf running across the floor in this pic.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Probably a non lizard person got access to the room