this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
240 points (98.8% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3656 readers
1514 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, anti-communism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Basic Course

Marxism-Leninism Study Guide: Advanced Course

Audiobooks Read by Dessalines

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 4 hours ago

Thatcher, like any capitalist dickhead, is a liar and malignant.

[–] dregan@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"eventually you run out of other people"

Incidentally, this is why they are pushing so hard for robots/AI to do what they need. Capitalism/money is nothing more than a complicated and thinly veiled facade for the power to make people do what they don't want to do. It is NOTHING more than that

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

It is and we are reaching it. We cannot longer keep paying all that capital gain.

Most of the cost of any product are capital gains nowadays.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It's so funny, because only one of those two systems is designed to invest back into itself. The other is a zero sum siphon that perfectly embodies what she described.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

Exactly. When I thought of it (not in the shower lol), I was like waiiiiit.....

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Didn't Liz Truss actually were the one managing to run out of UK people's money?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Thatcher said that with 0 irony as she defunded public hospitals to get replaced by charity from rich child rapist Jimmy Sevile

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago

Don't worry, Jim will fix it.

[–] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 53 points 11 hours ago

Go back into the history of capitalism, and every "scare" that capitalists use to maintain the system as is, happens under capitalism. The irony being that most capitalists see the end results of their greed and project it onto other systems.

Every accusation is an admission.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 hours ago

Narcissists project

[–] SaltyAmerican@lemmy.world 33 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The people that say this live in a country that's $40t in debt

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That famously American Margaret Thatcher

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 hours ago

It's happening everywhere, even if Americans seem to believe only America exists lol

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

$40t in debt

In debt to whom?

It's something of a joke to talk about credit expansion in a closed economic loop. Especially when the loop tightens and you end up with...

If I owe you a million dollars and you owe me a million dollars dollars, are we collectively $2M in debt?

We're entirely too zeroed in on the fictitious credit balances and totally divorced from real material conditions. How many labor hours are we spending? How much of our fossil fuel energy reserve have we committed? What is the growth/contraction rate of potable water and arable land?

I don't really give a shit about $40T in IOUs. I care about the actual managed decline of the capital stock. The actual number of skilled laborers in a given profession. The long-term burn-down of natural resources relative to our ability to conserve, recycle, and reproduce them.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They talk about the government debt, not nvidia or something.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

NVIDIA alone bolds $191B in US treasuries. So that's money the US effectively owes NVIDIA.

What do we want to bet NVIDIA's tax liabilities are for this year?

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but they are not indebted like a govt like you showed in your first post. I hate how stupid that circular "borrowing" is, but it has nothing to do with usa govt borrowing. NVidia are lending, and can choose to sell it off if/when they want to. The usa govt cannot sell off its debt if that makes sense.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

they are not indebted like a govt

No. They're much worse off, as they don't control their own currency or have sovereignty within their own borders.

I hate how stupid that circular “borrowing” is, but it has nothing to do with usa govt borrowing.

Governments (ostensibly) borrow money to provide economy-growing amenities and economy-preserving hedges against adversity. All of these loans can be described as investments, with an ROI tied back to national GDP growth and liabilities mitigation. The circular debt patterns of these mega-corps have a similar rationale. Oracle, NVIDIA, and OpenAI are effectively partners in a project to create a value-adding service. Their debt is an accounting tool to allocate future profits, not a drag on their economic activity. Just the opposite. Credit expansion allowed a party to bring more natural, capital, and labor resources to bare in a shorter time frame, in order to obtain profits sooner than otherwise.

NVidia are lending, and can choose to sell it off if/when they want to.

To whom?

Nobody else is in the business of producing microprocessors at this scale. NVIDIA extends the loans entirely to incentivize OpenAI to consume more compute, which incentivizes Oracle to build more data centers, which incentivizes NVIDIA to produce more chipsets.

Who else would want this debt? It doesn't serve the same economic end-goal. Who else would have enough currency to assume the debt?

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 21 points 11 hours ago

Yes, and that has already happened. That is why the richest have switched to the source of all money: The government.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, capitalists seem like they would be happy to just have slaves and all the nice things for themselves.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago

I would even remove the conditional there.

They currently own common folk more than people who actually legally owned other people.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Capitalists at that level transform into dictatorial oligarchs. Musk, Bezos, Zuck, Murdoch, and whatever other foreign and domestic counterparts they have…all similar.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

They’re already at a point where its basically slavery with extra steps or my go to. How close can we get to slavery without taking everyone’s free will.