this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
182 points (99.5% liked)

News

38970 readers
2312 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nine PBS is afraid that it will lose over 70 years of archival materials and programming after its contracted cloud storage vendor has apparently gone out of business. According to Current, the channel used Open Source Storage, or OSS, for storing over 50TB of data — but it suddenly lost access to its data earlier this year. Nine PBS has been working with OSS and its predecessor since 2019 and intended to renew its contract on March 6 of this year. The company never responded and abruptly cut off the station’s data access even though it still had 30 days to retrieve its data after the contract ended.

The station dug a little bit deeper when it discovered that the OSS website no longer existed and was listed as delinquent under the Colorado Secretary of State. It also discovered that OSS utilized Iron Mountain’s services, so it sent a demand letter to the latter to preserve its data and to "pay any reasonable costs associated with its demand." At the time, Iron Mountain did not confirm or deny that it possessed Nine PBS’ data.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But the cloud is safe secure and forever how could this happen

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 23 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It's safe if you're following proper backup procedures.

3 backups in 2 different forms of media with 1 being off-site

A single point of failure is always a bad thing.

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, the cloud makes proper 3-2-1 backups easier, *but you still need to take care of the rest of the 3-2-1. The cloud takes care of a third of the 3, half of the 2, and satisfies the 1. But it’s not a complete 3-2-1 backup by itself, and anyone selling it as such is blowing smoke up your ass to get a sale.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If done right, a third party could do 3-2-1 for you.

But unlike in this case, to do it right your clients need to know where the data is stored, and any 3rd party you contract with should have a clause that establishes your client as the data owner (as well as requirements for data return if the business closes).

This would have been easily avoidable, most likely if IT was allowed to be part of the contracting discussion.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A single place can't do 3-2-1. That's not "3" (just a single company = single point of failure, as demonstrated here)

[–] village604@adultswim.fan -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you not read my comment?

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did. Did you not read mine? If a single 3rd party entity is setting up all your backups, then that single entity still controls your destiny. That's still a bad idea.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So you didn't read my comment, because I already addressed all of your points.

I specifically addressed how to prevent what happened here.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

And a backup is not a backup until you successfully restored from it.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

no it's not... you're thinking of stuff being restored but that doesn't account for neglect and straight up theft of your information from these unsecure criminal companies like microslop

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Not to mention Microsoft has 400 forced copies of the same useless thing for work saved on multiple desktops that are not on my damn computer and need to be downloaded.

Fuck it shits me

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a different conversation.

But you can encrypt at rest the data you store in the cloud (with keys your provider doesn't have) without a lot of trouble.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Another 21st century mantra:

TWO IS ONE; ONE IS NONE

Or if it's decentralized and deduplicated, just as IPFS or Iroh.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Wait, you mean the cloud is somebody else's computer!!?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

IMO if a cloud storage company is gonna shut down, they should legally be required to send you the storage device(s) your data is on.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

50 TB isn't even all that much for your own NAS.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

still cheaper then monthly payments on some garbage subscription that keeps increasing in costs and decreasing in services and having the extra high chance of theft because you're giving everything to a criminal

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

It isn't much by todays standards. But imagine even a just a tenth of this (accounting for lover quality back then) for the older half of that data by 2000's storage costs.

[–] who@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Whether 50TB of lost data is "much" depends on what the data is, and whether it's replaceable.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they were talking about PBS having an on site storage solution to mitigate the risk for this exact scenario.

Before the AI price hike, a 50TB NAS would be less than $5k.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

I have a ~24TB usable array at home that cost me less than $700, built just before the AI bullshit. The 4x 12TB disks were $120 each. And it's got a second legacy array in there with another 4 drives.

It's general consumer hardware, because I had some of it on hand when transitioning from a Synology box, but it's not much more to have made it from scratch with enterprise rack mount stuff. $5k could get you quite a bit more than 50TB.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This story is in regards to a single PBS station in Missouri and not the national organization, in case anyone missed that.

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Me: I wonder how much Trump is related to... Oh, hi Blackrock...

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IRM/holders/?guccounter=1

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

So the company pulled some shady shit and now the new company that bought out the old one doesn't want to do anything. PBS needs to get a court order in to keep Iron Mountain from deleting that data while the court case is ongoing. They didn't follow the data backup guidelines but they did take the appropriate steps to retrieve their data.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Do they really not have more than one backup?

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Cloud storage is just someone elses computer.