News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
But the cloud is safe secure and forever how could this happen
It's safe if you're following proper backup procedures.
3 backups in 2 different forms of media with 1 being off-site
A single point of failure is always a bad thing.
Yeah, the cloud makes proper 3-2-1 backups easier, *but you still need to take care of the rest of the 3-2-1. The cloud takes care of a third of the 3, half of the 2, and satisfies the 1. But it’s not a complete 3-2-1 backup by itself, and anyone selling it as such is blowing smoke up your ass to get a sale.
If done right, a third party could do 3-2-1 for you.
But unlike in this case, to do it right your clients need to know where the data is stored, and any 3rd party you contract with should have a clause that establishes your client as the data owner (as well as requirements for data return if the business closes).
This would have been easily avoidable, most likely if IT was allowed to be part of the contracting discussion.
A single place can't do 3-2-1. That's not "3" (just a single company = single point of failure, as demonstrated here)
Did you not read my comment?
I did. Did you not read mine? If a single 3rd party entity is setting up all your backups, then that single entity still controls your destiny. That's still a bad idea.
So you didn't read my comment, because I already addressed all of your points.
I specifically addressed how to prevent what happened here.
And a backup is not a backup until you successfully restored from it.
no it's not... you're thinking of stuff being restored but that doesn't account for neglect and straight up theft of your information from these unsecure criminal companies like microslop
Not to mention Microsoft has 400 forced copies of the same useless thing for work saved on multiple desktops that are not on my damn computer and need to be downloaded.
Fuck it shits me
That's a different conversation.
But you can encrypt at rest the data you store in the cloud (with keys your provider doesn't have) without a lot of trouble.
Another 21st century mantra:
TWO IS ONE; ONE IS NONE
Or if it's decentralized and deduplicated, just as IPFS or Iroh.
Wait, you mean the cloud is somebody else's computer!!?