What if I use AI to generate images that would be as bad as if I did it by hand?

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
😇 Be Nice!
🏘️ Community Standards
🧬 Keep it Real
📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due
📋 Post Formatting
📬 Post Frequency/SPAM
🏴☠️ Internationalization (i18n)
Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]🍿 Moderation
The following artists are banned from the community.
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
What if I use AI to generate images that would be as bad as if I did it by hand?

Read the comic again, because the answer is clear.
Note:
frames one and three should not exist anyway. They are advertising. It was already malign before generative AI.
And Hank Green, despite the morons trying to sound clever by saying he did, did not use an LLM to write the script for the insert segment in that interview. He used a phrase, which was already a common diplomatic phrase, in a completely normal way. The phrase has made its way into ShartGPT outputs because it was already common, and people desperate to seem like they aren't fooled by LLM output are grasping at straws to find things to point at as 'tells' and turning into anti-tech-priests, consulting auguries to check for demons in the words of strangers.
There are no nice, neat tells. There are dozens of models, each with dozens of versions, each with some things that MIGHT serve as a tell, but you can't keep track of them, and the right prompt will disrupt them enough to ruin the tell, so you can give up. You can't reliably tell. That's the whole point. Enjoy living in the derealized, boiling world our annointed leaders have made. Hug your loved ones.
frames one and three should not exist anyway. They are advertising. It was already malign before generative AI.
Advertising as a concept is needed, though. Telling someone to come to your house on Friday is technically advertising.
We certainly need to regulate the shit out of mass advertising, but I always found the small flyer on a landline pole very homely.
Inviting someone over is not advertising.
describe or draw attention to (a product, service, or event) in a public medium in order to promote sales or attendance.
Meets the definition. I just want to make sure we make distinctions between general ideas and why we actually hate the concept in the modern day.
Telling someone to come to your house
public medium
This post may just inspire me to finally open Gimp and make some truly horrendous comics.
I love horrendous comics, if the premise is entertaining and you keep working on it then you'll get better at it too.
But then it wouldn’t be bad art anymore.
Truly the worst outcome
You should also check out Krita. David Revoy, artist of Pepper and Carrot, has a ton of great tutorials on using it.
I can only upvote you once. But imagine I held down on the screen for a reaaally long time when I did it.
The Hank Green bandwagon hate really fucking irritates me.
The man, and his brother, have done decades of charity work. Raised millions for all sorts of progressive causes (Pizzamas). Created completely free online educational course videos that I know a large percentage here used in highschool/college (Crash Course). Produced thousands of science videos and topics (SciShow). The pair of them spend their time trying to educate and improve lives in any way they can (VlogBrothers), and give back for everything they have.
Hank makes a video that appears to have AI assistance, and people are ready to drop them on the spot like none of that matters.
Hank even apologized for his reliance on it. Gave receipts that it was never used in any of his other works. Used his experience as a cautionary tale of how AI it take over a process, and promised to do better.
Doesn't matter..... his previous decades of charity. His lifelong commitment to education... irrelevant... people want to hang him out to dry.
They stretch themselves over complex topics, educational materials, charity events... everything.... FOR FREE. I don't blame Hank for trying to streamline and organize things. I think the man has taken on way more than any one person should do. I think the people jumping on him to make him some kind of pariah are nothing but self-rightious douchebag fuckheads that haven't done even a fraction of good as those two brothers have, and they know it. They want to use this one thing as though it somehow makes them superior, like they ever did a goddamn thing for anyone. Like they could even begin to understand that level of work and charity to do all of that.
The man made a mistake doing too much and these cretins are tearing him down for clout. It's fucking disgusting. Decades of positivity without controversy and yet it has afforded him no grace from the people who readily consume his content.
Hank makes a video that appears to have AI assistance, and people are ready to drop them on the spot like none of that matters.
Trust takes a lifetime to build and a second to break. This is no different.
Hank even apologized for his reliance on it. Gave receipts that it was never used in any of his other works. Used his experience as a cautionary tale of how AI it take over a process, and promised to do better.
That's all I care about, though. admitting fault and bettering oneself. I'm not one to think using AI once taints you forever. It's just a slipperly slope to outsourcing your brain, and I don't think Hank is doing that.
It's easy to do nothing wrong, it's hard to do something right. Hank Green is a treasure.
Also web articles. The moment I see the obvious AI tells I leave and block the website from search results.
The restaurant AI slop is the worst.... even a shitty cell phone picture of your food is better using AI on your menu... i truly dont understand
I would take Word (or LibreOffice Writer) bullet point list with prices and ingredients list over "pretty" AI menu at this point
The weirdest was when I was in a zoo and there were AI posters of animals they have in that zoo.
Bro just take a picture and add sone text, the animal is right there.
Consider that normal people don’t think like us nerds. They choose the shiny-looking version, not the handmade one.
I think that's changing. Nerds are often the vanguards, but the rest of the culture catches up later.
I get it, and I do somewhat agree. But at the same time, AI helps me to execute creative tasks I couldn't normally do and some things I can, but AI saves time.
But I don't just accept slop. I take the time to polish to get the results I want. It's still my idea and my vision, I just need a bit of help. This allows me to get results fast and fail faster. I can spend weeks in blender in my spare time building what I want, and I still do for some things.
Love how derpy they made Hank Green look
Seems like a bit of an overreaction to lump him in here tbh. Didn't he only use AI to help do research for a single video? And decided to not bother again because it sucked?
I think he was downplaying his use. He said he was getting addicted to the "dopamine" hit it gave him, which sounds like he was using it more than he claims. I don't believe his scripts weren't at least partly written by AI.
Like.. take 5 minutes to scratch out a shitty drawing on a post it before you make some AI slop. Your point can still get across and it’ll be appreciated more.
I replied to some AI post with the pic below and was blocked lol. Can’t pull the original because of that, sorry you’ll have to use your imagination to picture the slop.

Edit: just in case it wasn’t clear, I am not the author(?) of the original image. It was an AI slop graphic I just redrew on a post-it. In my opinion using AI harms the validity of any point you’re trying to make as it shows you’re unwilling to put forth effort to make your point and defend your position.
I understand the sentiment and feel somewhat similar about doing any drawings with AI, but I feel like a lot of people who say that you should draw even if it's bad, wouldn't pay attention to badly drawn things before AI slop became a thing. I definitely wouldn't have decided to visit a bar with a poorly drawn board just because intent is what's important, while sometimes I was tempted to visit a bar with artfully drawn board, that likely was commissioned from an artist. So when I hear people saying ‘do it yourself instead of slopping’ I can't shake off the feeling that it's rather being ‘do it yourself if you are good or commission from someone who is good’, because in competitive fields it is rather hard to achieve much when the only thing you have is intention
Oh man, I love good sandwich board art. That stuff is always my favorite. But yeah I get not every place has a creative employee who can spend time drawing that.
However clean text on a poster or sandwich board is far superior to AI slop (both in a moral and eye pleasing sense).
Also poorly drawn pictures can catch the eye just as well as well drawn pictures either because it can be humorous or because it’s eye catching (possibly in a bad way). But people do look either way, it’s why advertising works. I hate those stupid white billboards with black text that just say “Made you look”, because it works.
I mean, we've had gimp for free for ages now ffs.
Just ask your nerdy cousin to make something already. You know, that thing they call human interaction? Come to think of it, if you had more human interaction you might also get laid so you don't have to rely on a shitty ai gf.
Don't try stuff with your cousin though ffs.
Yeah, I have tried explaining this to people. We have been able to do all of these things for decades with minimal effort (and without destroying the planet while handing it over to fascist billionaires)
The issue: non-nerds have never even heard of a gimp, and the majority of people now do not use a computer. Try finding one young person who does most computing on a laptop, let alone a desktop (no one uses desktops any more. Of my ~15 friends/acquaintances I can think of, I am the only one with desktops). It's all phonephonephone (a phone loaded with spyware, to boot).