this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
80 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30930 readers
2122 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Todd Blanche issues formal order terminating measure widely derided as a ‘slush fund’, in move that could clear path for his nomination as attorney general

Acting US attorney general Todd Blanche issued a formal order late on Sunday terminating Donald Trump’s $1.8bn “anti-weaponization fund” to compensate his political allies, a move that follows weeks of negotiations with two Republican senators who were blocking his nomination to become attorney general.

While Blanche has repeatedly said publicly that the fund was dead, the justice department had resisted formally confirming that in writing. That had drawn concern from lawmakers that it could be revived in some form, especially after Trump expressed continued support for the idea.

A spokesperson for Texas Senator John Cornyn, one of the senators holding up Blanche’s nomination, confirmed the agreement. The other GOP senator, North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, did not have immediate comment.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finley@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I predict that they’re still going to try to move forward with this shitty slush fund anyway in some form, and then we’re gonna have to try to drag it through the courts to stop it.

This official document will make it easier to stop, but they’re gonna do whatever they can to move forward with it in some form nonetheless.

These people are lying scumbags, and this mood is yet another lie.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago

And if he's confirmed, he'll order it again.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The bar already is too low for this to mean anything. A judge has blocked the proposed settlement already, so it's insanely suspicious that Trump was willing to withdraw Blanche if necessary to not give up the settlement in writing.

Two huge problems that probably make this worthless despite that it almost certainly will satisfy the GOP holdouts:

  1. Now they have produced an "order," but it's not even clear what legal effect it has or why it can't be replaced with a new "order" reinstating it.

  2. There is still a retroactive immunity! How this is never in the headlines, is just a reflection of how they've successfully poisoned the conversation. Here's the article:

The document released by Blanche on Sunday night also limits the scope of another provision of the settlement that provided broad immunity for Trump and members of his family from tax audits. It clarifies that the tax audit immunity agreement “applies only retroactively” to claims open at the time of the settlement and does not protect the president from examination of future tax filings.

I doubt "claims open at the time of the settlement" is genuinely limiting. So the president and his entire family gratuitously get exactly what they wanted, a free criminal immunity for their fraudulent tax returns. The prospective immunity was never going to be held up in court anyway.

Blanche is Trump's personal attorney. Not was, is. Just like Bondi. Cornyn and Tillis did this so they can lie to themselves that they had a backbone, that's all.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

After what Trump did to Cornyn and Tillis, I don't understand why they'd vote for ANYTHING he wants. And given that his attempted manipulation might result in both seats flipping, I didn't know why any MAGA would support him either.

If either of those seats flip, it will be as a direct result of Trump's interference, and if I was a Senate MAGA, I'd stop supporting Trump entirely.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

That would make sense, but it's just as likely they are thinking about life after the Senate.

If their only marketable associations are via the GOP, if the GOP has become MAGA, and if they are exiled from MAGA-ified GOP, then they may still be trying to look like they weren't really opposed to Trump because it'll help them nab that Fox News correspondent spot, that speaking engagement, that cushy lobbying firm role.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

The atomic-scale upside to this, is that immunity is just as worthless as this is, once trump is out of office.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did Trump approve that? Because yesterday he was swearing up and down he was going to open it back up if Blanche wasn't confirmed.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Between (1) that and (2) the alcoholic prosecutor's surrender to the Olympic athlete, (3) the brain worm's retreat to recommending measles vaccinations, and (4) how the war Beelzebibi tricked him into is shaping out, I imagine President Pedophile is experiencing much consternation.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

Please forgive me for not trusting your obvious BS line

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well at least that's something positive to come out of this. Though I feel that if Cornyn didn't get fucked over in the primary by Trump he wouldn't have really put up such an opposition to this.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

Stop it. Why would you believe ANYTHING they say? Haven't you figured out that they're lying about EVERYTHING? Even if they put it writing, they'll do it anyway. Money to pay his Insurrectionists for his violent 2029 Coup? Tax immunity for life? He can't let that go, and he won't. Promises, documents, signatures, none of it matters, he won't honor any of it.

They've already confiscated over $13 billion in Venezuelan oil profits, and NOBODY knows where it is, and NOBODY is asking about it. They steal, they don't give it back.

They are going to do this, no matter what they promise.

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

Republican nominees lie to the Senate to get approved.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No he didn't. If you read the fine print, all parties must be signatories to all changes to the settlement meaning if Trump and his kids decide to force the settlement it can go forward. He's lying as well. Read this document Blanch signed. He didn't close the door on the fund.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

Trump's not giving up on this. This is the money that he intends to pay his violent Insurrectionists to fight for him when we try to make him leave in 2029. He can't pay them out of his own money because "MY money, are you fucking kidding me?" plus hiring a private army to launch a coup is pretty much a guarantee of getting executed when it fails,.which it will, because MAGA is virtuosically incompetent, and failure is guaranteed.

I hope he does it. It will give us the final excuse to deal with him decisively and when those Insurrectionists get froggy again, they'll be met with a wall of automatic gunfire, like they should have the first time. They won't get a second chance. We can wipe out the worst MAGAs in America in a few minutes, then execute their God.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Kill him and his fucking kids and pets

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

kids and pets

What in the hell is the matter with you?

[–] finley@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly. Also, an example needs to be set, which is why the current regime and it's sponsors are trying to ram through as much as they can as fast as they can.

They know what they've done, and they know that if they lose power now they're done. Life imprisonment if they're lucky

[–] finley@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Consequences. At long last, someone needs to experience consequences for their shitty shitty actions.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

You think Uday and Susay deserve to survive this? It's not like he cares about them.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Everyone in this thread is suddenly really comfortable with hurting innocent people/animals as long as they get to see the ones they hate suffer. Where have I seen that before...?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No member of the MAGA High Command is "innocent." The Trump children have been complicit in his corruption and crime, and they all deserve severe punishment.

And they are not being punished because they are hated, they are being punished because they are an organized criminal enterprise who has taken over our government and is actively looting it. We will punish their CRIMES, not their politics.

They aren't hated for their politics, they are hated for their corruption, treason, and pedophilia. Why do think people who have killed thousands, and stolen billions, and raped children, should get away with it just because they are MAGAs? Should they also get away with it if they were Democrats? How about independents?

How about NOBODY gets away with treason, corruption, and pedophilia, no matter what party they're from?

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't disagree; the full-grown adults who are complicit in the bullshit we've been subjected to absolutely deserve to be punished. But the comment I originally replied to demanded the death of "kids and pets" as well, which is plainly unhinged.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 weeks ago

Get wrecked, Todd.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

So when he said it was moot before, was he lying?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago

No he didn't, he lied. They always lie. They're liars.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

There's a new Guardian article now that addresses the sham of the confirmation agreement:

‘Completely hollow’: critics denounce Blanche deal to halt Trump slush fund

“These assurances are not worth the paper they’re written on,” Brandon DeBot, policy director at the Tax Law Center at NYU, said in a statement. “They don’t pull back on the ongoing attempts to give the president, his family, and his affiliates unauthorized immunity from tax audits. They don’t do anything new to stop the president from trying to bring back the fund, as he threatened to this weekend. It’s abundantly clear we need congressional action.”

The documents Blanche released only say the prior justice department order creating the weaponization fund is rescinded. It does not modify the original settlement agreement creating the fund, reached as the result of a Trump lawsuit seeking billions in damages for the unauthorized release of his tax returns.

Blanche acknowledged during his confirmation hearing that Trump or his sons – the plaintiffs in the case – could theoretically sue to enforce the agreement. Trump spent the weekend praising the slush fund, and even threatened to revive it.

Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House judiciary committee, said Blanche’s announcement does nothing to prevent the justice department and Trump from creating the weaponization fund under a different name.

Raskin said: “These hollow words are an affront to the American people, Congress and the courts, and are clearly designed to lull Senators Cornyn and Tillis into a false sense that their legitimate concerns have been addressed while leaving Blanche’s corrupt scheme fully intact.”

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Did the other party to the IRS lawsuit’s settlement also agree to terminate that contract? Wait a minute…

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I say still dont approve him. Hes slimy enough to find another way to get thw slush fund through

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Its like democrats have no concept of tasksies-backsies. Idiots.

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

This has nothing to do with the Democrats.