this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2026
180 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

86679 readers
3333 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Artificial intelligence labs are in a new arms race to buy up millions of rare books, slicing them open, scanning the pages and pulping the remains — sparking concerns that the last remaining copies of out-of-print texts are being destroyed on an industrial scale.

ISBNdb notes that “print books from the pre-LLM era are structurally guaranteed to be free of this contamination”.

“Millions of the most valuable books have never been digitised. They exist only in physical form, scattered across library shelves, used bookstores, and out-of-print catalogues. We get them to you at scale.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

You have got to be fucking kidding me

You people have no idea how much I want AI banned all across everything. I don't care about anything at this point. These people are EVIL EVIL EVIL EVIL. Pure breed CRIMINALS

Fucking 90% of the books I read are "rare"

"Oh, but there's SOME benefits to having AI", says some person on the internet that had it shoved down their throat by their boss. No. Fuck you. Fuuuuuuck you all the way.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

What's the point of destroying books after scanning them instead of reselling them apart from *hurr durr we are evil*?

[–] MadameBisaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 28 minutes ago

Cause to easily scan them they remove the binding and rebinding is more work %han destroyibg so the point is capitalism

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 minutes ago

Fair use loophole, they claim they convert one physical book into one digital with no illicit copies, while also supporting the delusion of AI being an equivalent to a human reader. It is weird on so many levels but no one of noticeable weight asked them wtf.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

To keep their competitors from buying them and scanning them.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Does anyone remember circa 2014 that radical jihadists in the middle east were destroying ancient and medieval artifacts, including stone heads? And I remember here in the liberal west we thought that was awful.

This is not the only thing that makes me think of that. Also Trump's recent calls to reduce the size of US national parks and open them up to oil and uranium mining exploitation.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah we remember. Because that’s a literal fucking warcrime. You’re not allowed to destroy historical sites.

While I agree that destroying books is bad - even common ones - it’s also not technically illegal. If I want to burn a first edition of whatever book worth thousands of dollars… I’m legally allowed to do that.

I can also see the benefit of having a digital version of a rare book that can be enjoyed by thousands as opposed to sitting on a shelf. But yeah, definitely hold companies accountable for destroying them. There has to be a better way to do that work and still have a useable book afterwards.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 minutes ago

The point of bookburning is that it would only be accessible to AI, bringing forth it's monopoly on said first edition. No one would upload it to IA in the process. It is deleting one source of knowledge out of existence.

[–] WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I don't trust AI companies to not alter the texts of those books if there's something in them that does not align with their worldview.
So any book added to the online archive(s) by these companies is suspect.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today -4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Random bulk rate books aren't artifacts. The vast majority of them probably have a copy in Anna's Archive.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 9 points 2 hours ago

If they did have a copy in Anna's Archive, why the fuck would AI companies find physical copies, buy them, rip them apart, scan them, and then digitize them before destroying them?

Remember, you don't get the digital copy. It's only used to train their models.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The use of the word "rare" implies that they are not bought in bulk....

[–] BassetHound@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Rare doesn’t necessarily mean culturally valuable. How many of these rare books are actually just old instruction manuals, travel guides, training materials, phone books, and dictionaries?

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

The issue with that is that we don't yet know what is culturally valuable or not.

Just because we don't see a need for the specific book now, doesn't mean it won't change tomorrow.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today -5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Which appears to be backed up by nothing.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Why are you so intent on riding big corpo cock? Do you think daddy Altman is going to praise you, call you his good girl?

You don’t actually need to play devil’s advocate, you know.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

Then they aren't rare books necessarily.

[–] peaceful_world_view@lemmy.world 15 points 5 hours ago

That's fucking evil.

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

That's absolutely disgusting. At this rate, governments should really be stepping in and stopping all this.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Issue is, the AI accelerationist cult has planned out every scenario, and they have a very good plan to amaze politicians. That's why the bubble haven't burst yet.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago

The whole point of post-enlightenment government is to serve the public good. But then it gets captured by capitalist interests (as Karl Marx explains in Das Kapital) at which point the government serves capital.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 hours ago

Destroying the an endangered book feels like it should be criminal no?

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 31 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Good way to prepare for rewriting history to their liking. Shredding/destroying the books should be illegal in this regard.

[–] bluefootedbooby@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

To be fair, we don't know what books those are, anyone can publish anything as a book these days. It doesn't have to be good or even true. For example, Jordan Peterson shits out some books, and I personally would not mind if all copies were shredded and forgotten.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

This makes me tear up a bit. All those lost books...

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 59 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

I really hope the AI bubble pops soon and takes at least some of these stupid companies with it. They've been operating at a GIANT loss for years at this point, how much longer will this go on?

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 1 points 2 hours ago

Depends on how much power the financiers have to fabricate capital from debt. In modern economics that's not necessarily a limitation. I do hope it will be tho.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 27 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The way I see the situation is that every single AI company can clearly see the massive wall they are speeding ever faster towards, they see it and can also see that it is a massive wall, thick and sturdy.

There is however one thing that keeps them pushing the accelerator down hard against the floor, the delusion that they alone is smart enough to find the prefect weakpoint where they can smash through to the promised land of massive promises, while everyone else is just flattened against the wall.

It is extreme narcissism combined with yes men powering this shit.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago

i think they are just making sure they arnt holding the bag. thats why i keep seing new AI startups popping up.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 hours ago

Nevermind that when this bubble pops, the US govt will give them all the money they need from our taxes.

Investors are starting to notice that it’s all smoke and mirrors in terms of the profits. I am reasonably sure it will pop this year. I will be utterly shocked if it doesn’t pop by the end of next year. It’s just so comically and obviously unsustainable.

This is gonna go down as the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time, I swear.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago

Anthropic described the project as “our effort to disruptively scan all the world’s books” in an internal memo, which noted “we do not want it to be known that we are pursuing this project”.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You know what, burn the whole fucking planet down. I'm done with this clown-ass species.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 4 points 10 hours ago

They're working on it :/

[–] GrabtharsHammer@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This sounded like clownish villainy in Rainbows End. I swear these guys are compulsively drawn to the worst parts of SciFi.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

“Book burning, you say?”

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The bookseller explained that in April, he suddenly went from selling around 20 books per week to hundreds — including obscure and out-of-print works.

“It benefits me financially as well as by clearing out old inventory that is otherwise unlikely to sell,” he said.

I hate the AI slop as much as the next guy, but these are books nobody wanted. They were going to rot on the shelf until being thrown out. Just being rare doesn't mean it's particularly valuable.

Hopefully they are retaining the digitized versions for release at some point in the future. I'd imagine they are, since they'd still need the raw data to train future models.

[–] el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You can't determine what knowledge will be useful or valuable to someone in the future. Archaeologists have poured over receipts and shopping lists from ancient Egypt that were thrown away. It's why the Internet Archive backs up all the random webpages they do. There's no justification for mass destruction of books, especially since it's being done to train broadly useless LLMs.

Of course they won't be releasing these books later on. These companies want to hoard this text data so their competitors can't access it. It would also be illegally distributing copyrighted work. Aside from destructive scanning being faster, the fact that a book is destroyed makes the digital copy "transformative" and therefore legal if it isn't further copied or distributed. A judge ruled on this recently. I don't mean to advocate for copyright enforcement, but that's the reality here.

I think China has a national repository of AI training data that companies can access if they contribute to it as well. Doing the same thing in the West would at least blunt some of the harm the AI craze is causing, but that would have made too much sense.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Bernie's plan for government control of AI companies made a lot of sense in this regard. And would mean those vast scanned libraries were public domain, or at least publicly stewarded.

But, ya know, 😱 socialism

load more comments
view more: next ›