this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
215 points (95.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

43762 readers
658 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It used to be you could find a box of photos or keepsakes that you inherited to look back on how things were or when you were a kid. Now, most of that is stored on phones, and most parents probably don’t think to share or save them in a way to be passed down in the future.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] devaly@ani.social 54 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean, most people don't ever look back at the photos they take. Phones have made photos almost valueless.

[–] jarvis@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yep. An archive of grandma's old phone photos will just be pics of casseroles, receipts, and questionably shaped moles.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I’d fucking love to have that for my grandmother though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah all the phone pictures I've got backed up I've hardly every looked up again, I think the fact that film cameras limited the number of pictures you can take and you had to develop them means those picture books automatically became more valuable

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

My parents were early adopters of digital photos, but also took a bunch on film and have scanned them. We have something around 20,000 photos. My parents display them on a screen in the living room and it's awesome. We're often mesmerized for dozens of minutes just watching and talking about the memories, and it's a great way to connect with my parents now that we're all adults, and really see the work they put in to give us a magical childhood. Before the physical photos were digitized we rarely flipped through the books if it wasn't for a school project or something

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As someone who had to go through my mother's and grandmother's boxes of photo albums after they died, I can tell you that what people should be doing now is backing up select photos AND adding a full description in the files metadata. The vast majority of the photos in my mother's and grandmother's albums meant nothing to me because the context and history of those photos died with them.

Aside from adding metadata for those you leave behind, you should make it a personal habit to go through you own old photos you have backed up. Those photos true value is not as a legacy but as means to remember as you get older. Life is long (hopefully). The amount of life you forget is staggering when you remember it.

[–] zackhow@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

This here. Another thing to do is if you are taking video of family moments, narrate in the background what’s been going on for the past few days or a week. It adds additional context that is invaluable and would most likely be lost to even the person filming.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Fwiw I've found digikam to be a very nice tool to help with editing and writing metadata directly to photos.

It's Foss and available for all OSs. Mainly helps because you can point it to a directory and highlight many photos and tag the same person, etc etc. It'll keep a list of tags to add as well. Unreal for the price of free but recommend donating of course.

[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How many pictures are lost because nobody ever looks at any of the 1000000 pictures they've taken?

[–] Kjell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I think you are right, they are all stored somewhere and might even have back-up. But at some point of time it will be way to many photos to go through in order to pick those that are worth saving. And then all photos might be deleted/lost.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

when my wife died, i was 32. the kids were 7, 8, and 10. there are tons of physical pics. but looking back at pics from almost 20 years ago now… sure i am gonna send each kid a usb key but… if i lost them i still have my memories. i wish however i took more video. i miss her voice. i am sure the kids do too.

but if i lost the media, frankly whatever. i already feel the loss daily anyway so … 🤷‍♀️

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Memories fade though. Looking through old photos can help keep them alive. Especially when you've lost someone. Believe me I know.

Old photos are something people don't always realize are important and special until years later.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

true. i did install immich and start organizing with the intent to export so there’s that at least. :)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SW42@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can ask the NSA for the backup

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

They are "cheaper" than s3 or back blaze since they outsourced the cost to taxpayers.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Eventually everything and everyone we have ever known will be lost to time.

[–] QuincyPeck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Like tears in rain.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

We had a house fire.

Several pictures saved from the fire are forever stuck to the glass from the frame where they were, forever behind a smoky glass front.

Other photos didn't survive the fire or the firehouses.

No one backed up their Polaroids or instamatic shots.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 2 months ago

Not sure thats a bad thing. The older I get the more I want to go out a ghost.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

My grandmother started throwing away photos of people she no longer recognized as dementia set in. No one was aware of this until it was way too late.

I don't have many pictures from my childhood. My grandparents took a couple of videos, but I doubt those VHS tapes survive.

One part of my wife's family lost basically everything in a tsunami. They managed to find two mostly-recognizable pictures, so even a box meant to be passed down isn't going to survive disaster.

I have a box of photos to scan, but I've never managed to get the scanner settings dialed in to where things look right to me and aren't gigantic files. I suppose it's OK, though; my family line dies with me so there's no one on to whom to pass them anyway.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Survivor bias.

You (generally) only know about physical photographs that have been preserved, and know not of those that have perished.

Digital photos have a higher chance of being preserved because the effort required to duplicate them is trivial. They may be inaccessible though.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure that is the case. It's certainly a trivial effort to switch on backups on your phone, but tge problem it that those backups go away at the same time your phone plan lapses. You're not going to stumble across great aunt Mabel's photos of family holidays, because her phone plan, and backups were cancelled when she passed away. It'll be the same with parents too. Unless they've taken the time and effort to curate and share them, they'll be gone with their owner. If you care about preserving those images, you need to have a conversation with people in your family, and arrange storage that will outlast you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Or equally as bad, relying on cloud services that will not stand the test of time.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean in 2 or 3 generations noone is going to care about your personal photos anyway. Realistically probably not even that long. How many times have you sat down to look at photos of your parents or grandparents as anything more than a passing curiosity? People don't even look at their own pictures. My sister just got married and her wedding package comes with like 1600 photos and a 2 hour video. Aside from when they first get them back I'd be willing to bet they never look back at 99% of those.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I look back at photos weekly, if you’re not looking back at them then stop taking them.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I learnt this after spending an entire day at a museum and taking loads of pictures. Then realised I am never going to look at any of these. So I stopped doing it. Why look at life through my phone when it is in front of me?

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

Conversely, I went to a place where my partner and I could hang out with, feed, pet, and snuggle heaps of animals we had never seen up close in real life—kangaroos, capybaras, porcupines (I was so scared but they were SOOOO sweet and loving!), baby binturong (we both cried, they climbed allll over us, my favorites easily), various reptiles, and way more. I was definitely in the moment but I did take oodles of photographs and videos. I look at them alllll the time. I am so happy I have photos and videos of that experience, I would regret so much if I didn’t!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Which cloud service is going to last 1000 years?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago

Which paper photo is going to last that long? Keeping personal data for that long requires an unlikely amount of continuous effort.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Being realistic, Ente stands the best chance for realistic photo storage

Great prices and backed up in nuclear bunker and two other locations

Has legacy/death hand over features

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Around a year ago, my dad went on a fishing trip with a friend, and his kayak flipped over due to how turbulent the conditions were, and due to that he lost his phone (which was in a waterproof pouch) in the ocean, which had likely multiple thousand family photos that weren’t backed up at all. The friend he was with decided to go diving in that area to try find it, but never did despite how calm the water had been after that incident.

Now he backs his photos up from his new phone to Google drive, however I’m not sure whether he’s actually checked if it’s syncing or not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

To be fair I don’t think much anyone but the parents care for the photos. The number of old photos and albums I see in antique stores and estate sales is staggering. I’m not saying nobody wants them at all, but generally unless you have something very interesting like Dad working on some important civic project or a snapshot of him in theater as a soldier, or Mom as Wendy the Welder or in a foreign country as Doctors Without Borders, most of the generic family shots of christmases and travel get filtered out into the trash.

Also, most all modern ink and paper is non-archival, so it won’t last.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

After my dad died I made a photo board for his memorial, it's so weird because there was maybe 100 or 150 of photos of his entire LIFE. Both my parents hated getting their pictures taken, and no way were you taking a video of them. It's sad I don't have videos of my dad. I'm trying to take more of my mom now but it has to be stealthy

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

A drop in the bucket compared to those that were never taken at all in the last 4,000 years of civilization before the picture boxes came to be.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I reccommend, and am certain many parents already do, to print the good photos and put them in a book.

Back your stuff up is good advice, in case the worst happens, but nothing beats physical books your kids can look through.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I bought one of those photo printers for this exact reason. Every once in a while, I’ll print some favorites and put them up in the house and in a photo book. It’s really nice to see them in physical form and not in my phone!

I’ve also given friends copies of group photos as gifts!

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Better yet, back up to your computer, that is backed up to an external hard drive, that is copied to a trustworthy cloud somewhere. Always good to have duplicates should something happen.

I lost about 12 years of pictures after getting rid of OneDrive (getting rid of Microsoft cuz I maxed out the 1TB anyway), and no joke a few weeks later on my personal server, 4 out of 8 hard drives failed. Thinking it was my raid card, I replaced them, couldn't get it to function. Apparently a storm that we had fried some components and not others, and I swear I had duplicates on some old offline drives, so when I installed those to restore, I did not have everything. Crushed my heart!! I bought a bunch of large flash drives specifically for photos and videos, and started to back up to those for historical purposes.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Very few really care about all of the data you're producing over your lifetime. How many times have you taken serious efforts to go to the city archives, or read through inherited documents and photos, etc...?? Are you doing anything with them or just sitting on them?? Flicked through it once? Fun.

Now with all of the bulk data we produce what are future gens gonna do with it? Prolly dump it into an AI to summarize and puke out into some trite little video memoir... That's it, your life reduced to a twenty second collage for social clout.

If you set out to fight entropy, you're not gonna win.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Pretty much. I’m a data hoarder, to a degree. My homebuilt, Ship of Theseus NAS is about 15 years old, and it contains data going back over 20. I save everything I produce.

I figure that one day, this data of mine will be fed into a system for future use, in the vein of how they construct people in the Star Trek Holodeck. So, I feel it’s up to me to curate that data, and be sure it’s accurate and reflects who I am.

These days it’s obvious that it will eventually be turned into training data for an LLM, but then at least, my data will have some structure and personality to it. Maybe someday a joke will be cracked for someone that came from a pattern I established. Probably not, but one can dream.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

My sister in law lost a lot of data since she didn't learn from her first fried SD card.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My mom has SD cards with thousands of photos she takes as part of her job and it drives me nuts that I have to keep telling her to back them up. She always says that she's never had one fail, which is true, but she'll unfortunately have to learn this lesson the hard way at some point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Probably less than the moments that are lost in time before the invention of the digital camera.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I've thought about getting my photos transferred to archival microfilm before, but backups on a usb hard drive, my own personal server, and a cloud service should do for now XD

[–] ItsMeForRealNow@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Eventually every single one.

[–] cuboc@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Father of two here. I have tried to start sorting through the pictures that were made during the years by my wife, parents and in-laws. We are literally talking thousands of pictures here. Trust me, you do not want all of those.

Let's project (pun intended) here. I grew up in the time of analog cameras, i.e. somewhere before 2000-ish. Back then you had to buy a camera, preferably a decent one. You had to buy a film roll, which had typically had a capacity of 24 or 36 pictures. If you ran out of film, you had to go out and buy new film. Having done that, the film had to be developed and the negatives had to be projected onto expensive paper, which needed their own chemicals to change actual pictures. When you took a picture, it had to count. A shoe box of printed pictures typically used to represent several years of personal history.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lath@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

All of them. Nothing survives the passage of time. Everything will disappear at some point.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago
[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Before digital? Millions. After digital? Possibly trillions? All those photos backed up to the “the cloud” make great training data, though!

load more comments
view more: next ›