this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
248 points (99.6% liked)

politics

30412 readers
2314 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senate Democrats blocked a $1 trillion annual defense bill Tuesday, refusing to advance the bipartisan package that would substantially increase Pentagon spending, including a pay raise for the troops, in protest of President Donald Trump’s war against Iran.

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer announced his opposition and other key Democrats said they could not support the annual bill, known as the National Defense Authorization Act, as the war drags into a fifth month with no clear endgame in sight. The tally was 50-46, failing largely along party lines to reach the threshold needed.

“The NDAA cannot become a permission slip for that recklessness that we see occurring in Iran,” Schumer, of New York, said ahead of voting.

“Donald Trump does not get to drag the American people deeper into a war he cannot explain and does not know how to end—and then demand that Congress look the other way.”

The Senate vote comes a day after the White House formally notified Congress that it had resumed bombing strikes against Iran, effectively undoing the fragile ceasefire in the U.S.-Israel led conflict that has resulted in economic disruptions, including volatile gas prices ahead of the midterm elections.

Congress has tried repeatedly to slap guardrails on the administration, voting more than 10 times on various war powers resolutions that would halt hostilities. But those efforts have not succeeded, and most Republicans in the House and Senate majorities back Trump.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune called the defense package a good bill and implored his colleagues to provide the resources to ensure the U.S. is kept safe.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] artyom@piefed.social 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No room for $400M for USAID but we totally need to throw another billion at an embarrassing war that doesn't exist but also we won on day 1.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trillion. It’s our healthcare money

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly. We shouldn't be spending a trillion bucks on ANYTHING, until we have health care in this country.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

You guys are 39 trillion in debt and spending almost a trillion in nine months on interest alone. The last thing you should be doing is ballooning the defense budget or any other budget for that matter.

Any other country and the entire nation would be flooding the streets and demanding a change in governance.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Nothing will improve until we overthrow these treasonous politicians

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

We're spending that each day apparently in Iran.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Congress has tried repeatedly to slap guardrails on the administration, voting more than 10 times on various war powers resolutions that would halt hostilities. But those efforts have not succeeded, and most Republicans in the House and Senate majorities back Trump.

I'm old enough to remember when everyone agreed you needed 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate.

Curious how the Iran bomb money and the Israel genocide money always keeps getting through.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune called the defense package a good bill and implored his colleagues to provide the resources to ensure the U.S. is kept safe.

The United States has spent over $14 trillion on cumulative defense and national security since 2002. Curiously, we still aren't any safer than we were the day before the 9/11 attacks.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 3 points 15 hours ago

At a certain glorious the Dow was over 50,000, though

[–] GardenGeek@europe.pub 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But you have more debt, an overall worse societal outcome ... and a few people got insanely rich. Did you say 'Thank you!' once?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago

He was never the issue to begin with and I bet he is still alive.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm old enough to remember when everyone agreed you needed 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate

You never needed 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate. What you need 60 votes for is to decide to stop arguing and hold the actual vote. Voting for cloture doesn't necessarily mean you intend to vote for whatever is being discussed.

It's entirely possible that Democrats voted for cloture specifically because they knew it didn't have the votes to pass, so why not just hold the vote and get it over with.

[–] Pistachio@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Used to need 60 votes to confirm secretaries and judges, dems canned that but left it for scotus position, only for the rep to take that away

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Arguably the sealed metal doors on plane cockpits are safer but they didn't cost 14 Trillion.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

On the Airbus, maybe.

Boeing? I wouldn't bank on it

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

That's a good point. There's probably a realistic comparison between the danger from hijackings and the dangers of deregulation.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We as citizens are far more endangered by our for-profit healthcare system and the risk of poverty and homelessness always one market turn away than from anything the military prevents. I bet a trillion dollars a year could help make is safer from the real threats.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate the US healthcare system. I've had the same doctor for like my entire adult life, but my current shit insurance says they're "out of network". And I can't figure out what I need to do to get a weird skin-thing looked at. If it's cancer and it goes badly because of this delay, I am going to be furious and then probably dead.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Talk to your favorite doctor, maybe they can get added to your network. I've had mixed results with that over the years, but it's worth a try.

I once got networked out from my favorite doctor, and procrastinated finding a new one. Then I got a sinus infection and figured I'd just pay for a visit to get antibiotics, but they had been added to my network by then, and the visit was covered!

Sometimes procrastination works, like slapping the side of the TV.

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good, let them hold a fucking bake-sale to buy a bomb...

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What, like what peasants have to do to pay for cancer treatments? That’s communisocialism libtard!

~literally fuck this god damn reality~

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Let's just make the military budget a GoFundMe. I'm sure the super patriot bomb humpers will chip in. Maybe AIPAC can redirect their lobbying money to the effort.

Surely the military, which drains massive amounts of money and has never passed an audit, will be very successful in a simple capitalist market.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

Imagine how well the Democrats could do in the midterms if they actually were to hold the line on this. I know they'll cave, because it's just what they do, but just let me dream for a few minutes...

[–] ape_arms@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

This same bill would merge the US and Israeli militaries. Total bullshit. This country is fucking crumbling around us as we wait for free snacks at Costco.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can't help but notice Chuck has no issues with the parts about giving carte Blanche to the executive to redirect our millitary budget and resources to Israel specifically.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Since deaths come in threes, after McConnell (🤞🏽)and Graham, I was really hoping Schmuck would round out the trio. His loss would be an enormous Democratic gain, and a serious blow to MAGA.

Just an aside: I don't use emojis much, but when I went to add the crossed fingers emoji, I realized that I no longer have Caucasian emojis, they're all brown. I'm not an offended MAGA or anything, but what happened to my Caucasian emojis?

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Well, it is what the Baileys would want him to do, you know.

[–] amoogus@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

*Senate uniparty kicks off its show pony song and dance before ultimately giving in

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

“Military Industrial Complex pony club, I’m gonna keep on dancing at the Military Industrial Complex pony club!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

It's got a pleasant lilt to it.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

"They promised to listen to us in the future."

[–] BarnWolf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Whatever, it's all for show. They ain't doing shit, clearly, after all this time. They'll let it go through in a week or so cause all the Democrat senators are fucking pussies. They all bend right over when shit gets too tough for them.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 1 day ago

Let them pass it if Pentagon can pass an audit

(this is a joke, the Pentagon has never passed an audit)

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

'Amazingly, everyone in Senate got through the whole ordeal without pointing out that their democracy is a rotting husk drooping corpse fluid on their constituents in need', said a baffled onlooker while they tried really hard not to buy that latte-frappé today. 'Paramilitaries roam the streets in search of the next kill, true, but the pastries at the buffet today were really spectacular, you got got have the good with the bad' Said a senator who couldn't feign even the slightest iota of interest.