this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
99 points (92.3% liked)

Canada

12136 readers
514 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senator Lindsey Graham dedicated his life to serving the people of South Carolina and the United States.

Throughout his career, he stood resolutely in defence of democracy and freedom, most recently and particularly with Ukraine and its people.

I offer my condolences to Senator Graham’s family, friends, and all those who served alongside him.

It's real. Apparently Joly and Anand also chimed in.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

They're so out of touch they actually don't realize how they sound.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

My statement is “rest in piss, bozo”

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

Politicians are the only invertebrate mammals.

[–] asg101@lemmy.ca 24 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If only they said "despite our disagreements, my heart goes out to the grieving family" or some other tasteful bullshit to dodge it. I'd look the other way, I'd say that politicians do what they have to do.

But they don't. They are straight up sucking up to his corpse for no reason at all. Also, Carney was really happy about the attacks against Iran, so fuck him all over.

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It's not for no reason, it's always the same reason. The people in the deepest parts of the slime salute their peers because they can't face the truth that if they don't, then nobody will salute them when it's their turn.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Is there a Senator Lindsey Graham in Canada or is this guy just massively stupid?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Typical liberal.

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 10 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Strongly disagree with what Carney said, but not sure he could say anything other.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Some would say being authentic goes a long way these days. Artificial platitudes don't land like they used to.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Shoulda said nothing. I highly doubt anything material and good comes from this message. Saying nothing would've avoided the rest.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago

And who the fuck is out there demanding the Canadian PM say something about a relatively old American senator dying of an illness? Literally the only reason to ask for a comment is to try to incite some inflammatory bullshit from one angle or another.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

I keep wondering if Carney is gambling on the rapist kicking it sooner rather than later and just spewing platitudes to keep rapists eyes on other things.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

People have been calling Carney a "red Tory" but I think he's actually a 2000s era neoconservative. We've more or less made David fucking Frum our prime minister.

Let us also not forget that Lindsey Graham called for the invasion of Canada at least once. That is apparently what the "right, honourable" Mark Carney considers to be a resolute defender of democracy.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Throughout his career, he stood resolutely in defence of democracy and freedom

Didn’t know Mark Cuckey was a former writer for the Beaverton

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

oh fuck off Mark. all that good will and optimism from the people you had earlier this year you've quickly squandered. You have quickly turned your party into "The Cons V2" so now we have to rely on the god damn NDP who STILL don't have their shit together.

you're not helping, you didn't need to say anything, Stop ass kissing the US when you were in fucking commercials with mike myers saying "elbows up". fuck off buddy. I TOTALLY regret voting for this ass clown.

[–] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 11 points 17 hours ago

Lewis is working pretty quickly to make the NDP relevant again. That's why Poilivre is being kept around despite no hope of forming a majority - to drive Canada towards a two party system.

[–] Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Liberals have been acting like the USA democrat faux progressives for a while. Like when smaller parties started running on voter reform to avoid getting stuck in the same two party 'fascists vs faux opposition' deal that has already turned the states into a corrupt pillaging competition. Liberals suddenly ran on voter reform, and when Trudeau won he was immediately like "oh THAT'S what voter reform means? Oh of course we're not doing THAT lol." and all momentum for voter reform was lost.

Corpo fascists in anti fascist clothing, and local progressives can't seem to gather without chasing all of the effort out of the group with local toe stepping, and god forbid instead of bombs we ever get money put into taking modern understanding of complex systems and using it to scale heterarchical cooperation between non-identical groups with honest progressive intents.

So you have fascists pretending to be progressive, and progressives attacking different kinds of progressives instead of the fascists, and everyone gets mad when you try to make this particular framing more salient.

I got weird looks when I'd originally been asked what I thought about Carney before his election, and I said "he is saying and doing the right things, but I only expect that to last as far as it's opportunistically useful.

He's playing the political game now in a way that legitimizes that fascist regime that keeps threatening our country, and I'm not on the side of 'safely' capitulating to fascist regimes.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So you have fascists pretending to be progressive, and progressives attacking different kinds of progressives instead of the fascists, and everyone gets mad when you try to make this particular framing more salient.

Venn diagram

[–] Peanutbjelly@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

looks about right.

TLDR: it's a hard balance without letting groups get derailed or astroturfed, but if we can't actively scale progressive efforts collectively, we will all die in our little lonely bubbles knowing that at least "i got mine," or whatever.

although i'd suggest a lot of the leftist infighting is instigated, a large part of it is the half-century of rich jerks attacking education and science, both systemically and culturally.

progressive groups tend to grow out of lived traumas, and seem weirdly easy to pit against each other due to their natural stress and defensiveness.

there are good examples like groups like atheists fighting and feminists while the heritage foundation and cohorts run away with the cake. atheists trying to ban circumcision in the USA? obviously it's because they hate women, better rally and attack them and make them defensive and not able to continue making the heritage foundation's corruption too salient. feminists academics figuring out how model social structures so that we can act with more basic freedoms and autonomy outside of the constraints of systems that we already know are not working? obviously these are the same people attacking the atheists for the misogyny of trying to get circumcision banned and sending them images of phallic mutilation. i wish more feminists successfully fought for a presentation counter to that, the same way one would not care to associate with TERFS (who act as progressives, but ignore trans rights through the same weird 'letting trans people exist hurts women somehow probably, don't think about it.' kinda crap.)

usually the problems (of people who actually care about general progressive ideals) boil down to bad/disabled communication, and refusal to actually engage with the perspective of the other group/party. i wish more progressive groups would grow an arm specifically for comprehending and enacting efforts at different scales, mixed with modern academic understanding of complex and high-dimensional living systems, which is an essay or five in itself. unless we collectively put value there, we just won't have the tools to properly scale collective intent.

i think all groups have an easily influenced chud populace, but these pots definitely feel additionally stirred, and i used to have a long list of little media corps that came and went doing nothing but articles stirring up divisive shit for congregate sites. trying to just talk about out how to make progressive cooperation work has gotten me banned from a weirdly high number of progressive communities as well over the past 2 decades, so i think it's safe to say this topic still hasn't been allowed to become salient enough.

solidarity is important for a reason. it's a shame i can't interact with half of the groups because if the subgroup starts lynching someone, and you say "these are innocent people catching strays, and 'punching up' by punching down at the 'bad identity group' when you have the power to do so is harmful to anything we should be trying to achieve from any actual academic comprehension of intersectionality and our high-dimensional lived reality. trying to encourage a group to act in a way that doesn't isolate them and hurt their effort just gets you banned, and now we are in modern times and it went as you would expect.

it's really hard to navigate these spaces because of how paradoxical the lived experiences become in diverse groups actively growing and further complexifying their own precision and weighting on polysemous boundings (such as the 'nobody agrees on what liberals are' problem.) also science communication is shit, so we don't have anyone actively communicating this stuff to the public, also i guess adults just have no incentive to learn anything ever unless they are already in an academically enabled pocket, which is its' own conversation. would really be a really functional spot for artists and other communicators, which do exist, but are mostly paid to make advertisements so people who have too much money can be more salient and make a bigger portion of the money. etc.

shit's broke.

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 19 points 1 day ago

Fuck you too, Mark.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Centrists are just conservatives too afraid of the label

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Centrists are the least informed and ironically are the most authoritarian bunch of the left-right paradigm.

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 62 points 1 day ago

Graham was an absolute fucking cunt. The only thing he was ever good at was eating Trump’s ass. Everyone knows he loved going deep on that one.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The rate at which I am losing respect for this clown, is ludicrous.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

I lost all respect for him the moment hr started proposing bill C-2 (now C-22) and others.

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 8 points 1 day ago

I'm curious to see if he makes it past 1 term at this rate. The problem is, now that Libs and Cons are blurring, does the NDP get stronger or was fascism in Canada only briefly delayed?

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

did anyone seriously expect the investment banker to be on any side but status quo?

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What the absolute fuck, etc. Could have and SHOULD have said nothing.

In case you don't know what Lindsay Graham was, especially in Canadian context, David Doel did a good recap.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Carney's playing politics, riling up Trump or the Republicans would just put his statements into the news cycle for weeks and then the 51st rhetoric would go around again.

That being said, yeah, saying nothing sounds good. If it wasn't nothing, I would have preferred him just keep it far more neutral.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He should not have said anything, if he had to I would have really preferred he rilled up the Trump ass eaters. Got Canadians back to the boycott a little more.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago

Trump only care about himself.

[–] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 3 points 20 hours ago

I kind of assume Carney is part of the new liberal establishment (think Clinton, Biden but also Bush) so recently overthrown by Trumpism in the US - but I'm not Canadian so it's a little fuzzy.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago

Nope. Learn when to keep your mouth shut Mark. This, is not working to unite Canada.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago

Fuck carney the bullshitter

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 day ago

Shut up, Mark.

load more comments
view more: next ›