this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
111 points (93.7% liked)

World News

56906 readers
2006 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia is planning an armed “provocation” on Polish soil to test Nato’s resolve, the United States has warned.

Polish critical infrastructure could be targeted by missiles and drones or Russian soldiers could cross the border into Nato territory.

Washington has issued several warnings to Warsaw about the plot, sources close to Karol Nawrocki, the Polish president, told Onet, the Polish news outlet, which, along with The Telegraph, is owned by Axel Springer and is part of its Global Reporters Network.


Additional context:

The United States has warned Poland that Russia may be considering an armed provocation on Polish territory in the coming months to test NATO’s resolve and pressure Western allies to scale back support for Ukraine

According to Ukrainska Pravda, citing The Telegraph, sources close to Polish President Karol Nawrocki said Washington had warned Warsaw that Russia was weighing scenarios that could include drone attacks on critical infrastructure, such as power plants, or a simulated large-scale air attack designed to force Poland to activate its air defenses.

A more radical scenario could involve a hybrid attack in Poland’s border region, potentially with the participation of Belarusian forces. Russia could attempt to explain away a border violation by claiming its troops had become lost because of GPS disruption or were carrying out a rescue mission after a helicopter emergency.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/79532

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Faithless@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they are more working with bots and trolls to raise anti-Ukrainian sentimente in Poland. Thry are succesful at that

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

Shame if a few troll farms got droned.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Failing in Ukraine... so Russia will now also provoke a heavily armed NATO country.

Serious doubt this is real.

[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure what to think about it - a risk certainly exists, but I can't put a probability on it currently.

I live in one of the countries which has been warned about a provocation - Estonia. Over here, we've been preparing for this at some kind of a pace (IMHO too slow) for quite some years. An admission must be made: both Ukraine and Russia are way ahead in mass production and use of drones. They both punch above their weight with drones (and both have considerable weight too) and have considerably more antidrone defense set up than neighbouring countries.

Russia manufactures an awful lots of drones per day. But as long as Ukraine fights it with an equally awful lot, Russia simply lacks resources for a big provocation, since Ukraine is tying down all their resources.

Russia has fuel shortages, manpower shortages, armor and artillery shortages, no surplus of drones either (they fly to Ukraine within days of leaving a factory). There could be a stockpile of 100 or 200 Iskander short range ballistic missiles, less of other types. On the background, of course, the Soviet-built strategic missile forces exist untouched. But they're not capable of being used with conventional warheads, since their precision is too low.

Meanwhile, Putin's popularity is finally dropping. Parliamentary elections are approaching. It's fairly obviouls that special services must be considering "creative" ways of taking back initiative. But I can't clearly see what they would hope to achieve with this kind of activity.

Hypothetic perspective from Russia: "let's f*ck around and see if NATO has resolve"

  • Option A: NATO does not have resolve, but Ukraine used the day to blow up another series of important industries
  • Option B: oopsie, NATO does have resolve and just joined Ukraine in blowing up stuff

I don't see a winning option.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I believe the idea is that they fuck around in Poland, NATO responds meekly, and Poland therefore blocks Ukraine aid to not risk further attacks from Russia if NATO doesn't have their back.

But it sounds like a very stupid plan, agreed.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

NATOs resolve? Putin had better hope we can all hold Poland back from finally acting on what has been the burning national desire to turn Russians into a fine pink mist.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 7 points 2 days ago

We won't hold Poland back. We'll be right there, shoulder by shoulder!

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Kyiv Post tends to be a little less bombastic with their reporting:

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/79532

They word it differently, saying the US warned that Russia was "considering" an attack. This is probably true, and has probably been true every year for the past several decades. Simply because a nation's military planners "consider" pretty much everything they can think of.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Kyiv Post tends to be a little less bombastic with their reporting:

Also, the Telegraph is reactionary shite, not to be trusted.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 8 points 3 days ago

Thanks. Updated the post to include Kyiv's perspective.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"US Warns" is like, "ChatGPT said".

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They had been right since Ukraine though. Nobody, except Ukraine of course, before the invasion believed the US warning because 1) invading a country that historically hates you and expecting no resistance is stupid. That's like Britain invading Ireland again. 2) the US lied about Iraq before. I hate to say this as someone who loathe US for invading Iraq under falsified intelligence report, but this time the US intelligence is telling the truth. Broken clock is right twice a day and all that while also the US is the boy who cried wolf.

This news is the usual border movement and sabre rattling from Kremlin to compensate from the fact that they are proven to be paper tiger. All bark and no bite. It's like Kevin Hart wanting to fight Andre the Giant because Kevin feels so insecure.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a difference in credibility between trying to make excuses for attacking versus sharing intelligence for defence though.

If the story was that Iran was preparing to attack Poland to support Russia and that's why the US started their illegal clusterfuck, then yeah that would be completely different.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except the US and Poland are not trying to make excuses to attack Russia?

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

...........

that's literally exactly what I'm saying.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Now i'm no military expert but even I know out of all the possible ideas Russia could have, this is the worst.

Poland is quite literally chomping at the bit for the ruskies to try something. They've been prepping for it for god knows how long now. The Polish Military would absolutely kick the russians teeth in on their own without the need of NATO if it called for it.

russians are stupid but this is just posturing. empty threats. For the decades of russian lying they've never been able to get good at it. like someone who has been playing the piano for years but still can't play twinkle, twinkle, little star...at some point you just need to tell them "stop, you're not good at it, and you never will be."

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

I genuinely thought about 3 years ago that Poland was going to join the war, with or without consent of Nato on the side of Ukraine. From their pov, they won’t get an opportunity to hurt Russia as much as it would now in the next 50 years at least. If this was a game and no actual lives were at stake, or if Russia had no nukes, they would have pulled that trigger already.

That being said, if sufficiently provoked, I don’t expect them to sit idly by. From a geostrategic pov it might actually be necessary for them to secure their eastern flank, given that Germany is rearming and afd is very friendly to the Kremlin.

[–] Tolc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

seems like lockheed martin wants to sell more weapons

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Then EU members should leak that they're considering taking Kaliningrad.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This mildly concerns me because I've had a paranoid thought that the orange turd has been planning to announce the official US withdrawal from NATO on July 4th.

Not to say Poland and the other NATO allies couldn't handle a deeply weakened Russian military but no idea what downstream effects this may have

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

NATO without the US would most likely be still strong enough to face Russia. This is assuming the US just sits out and doesn't become an antagonist in some fashion.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh shit... I never thought about that.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's the same shit Germany pulled before WW2. If we'd have had a different president we'd have been aligned with Germany.

Either way we were going to wait and watch and jump in with the winners.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Considering how badly they seem to be doing in Ukraine, this seems like a fairly large tactical error.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Putin needs to mobilize the Russian populace to make any progress in Ukraine, but doing so would make the urban centers of Moscow and St. Petersburg revolt. He needs a damn good reason. If he doesn't mobilize, Moscow and St. Petersburg are going to revolt, and he's going to end his days hanging from a lamppost.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 23 hours ago

a lamppost

There's also the Gaddafi option.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

We can but hope

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

"The US government says" a lot of crazy shit. Russia doesnt have the oil or cash reserves, or troops or hardware to initiate an attack on NATO. I imagine its the US spreading fear for its own advantage before the NATO meeting.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 7 points 2 days ago

Doubt it. Even Putin knows not to check for electricity by pissing on the fuse box.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shouldn't trust the word of Russian sympathizers but it wouldn't hurt to be on guard just in case.

Poland will mop up the floor with what's left of his troops. He'd be fucking stupid to even try. Makes me wonder if he's spreading this rumor via his puppets for some other reason-- and it most definitely has something to do with Ukraine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)
  1. Provoke NATO into conflict
  2. Blame NATO joining conflict for having to end conflict
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Sure, create a new front when you're getting the shit kicked out of you at the current front. At least you've got plenty of air defense to defend you from two attackers instead of one. Oh wait... You don't even have the air defenses to stay safe from Ukraine.

I'd also imagine they're almost out of drug addicted convicts to send to the front lines as well

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Mihies@programming.dev 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Not again this warmongering crap...these days Russia is supposedly attacking western countries left and right.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

russia desperately needs to be conquered so it can get aid.

load more comments
view more: next ›