this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
461 points (98.5% liked)

Texas

2423 readers
413 users here now

A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas

Other Texas/US Lemmy Communties to follow

Sports

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Rules (Subject to Change)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

So if they aren't adhering to the Constitution, then why should they keep benefiting from any part of it? Why should they even be part of the Union?

I would be fucking FURIOUS if I was a tax payer in Texas. What a shithole.

[–] Snowwdropp@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Plot twist: Texas is kicked out of the Union before it gets independence

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Hey, make them take Louisiana, FL, and Alabama. Let them carry those deadbeats a while and see how they like it.

[–] fdnomad@programming.dev 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be nice to separate religion from the government

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

No, that's an awful idea. Why would anyone do that?! It's not like it's literally enshrined in the constitution or anything.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm ready for Shakira law whenever, wherever.

[–] Dolphinfreetuna@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

At least hips don't lie.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Good, do it.

There's no better way to raise a generation of atheists than reading the Bible. It's ridiculous.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They don't mind sharia law as long as it's their christian nationalist flavor of it.

[–] optimisticturtle@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Y'all Qaeda

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're cool with the christian caliphate.

Fitting alliteration, that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago

The criticism is mostly jealousy.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

It’s wild that Texas even wants to mandate a reading list at the state level. Aren’t there just simple regional differences to account for?

I wouldn’t expect a school in San Diego to mandate reading John Steinbeck whose stories are mainly set in Central and Northern California for example.

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

I actually grew up in Central California and both Grapes of Wrath and East of Eden were required reading for us in junior/high school

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Well they can't spread their Christian Nationalism (Nat-C) ideology far and wide if they keep it regional.

And if you're using tax payer dollars to violate the Constitution, why not go big?

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

As an aside, the guy in the picture seems so awfully familiar.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

All it takes is the Insurrection Act, to force this shit on all 50.

[–] starik@lemmy.today 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

There’s nothing better for turning Christians into atheists than making them actually read the Bible. I approve.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

Insert if them kids could read meme.

[–] learningtosew@sh.itjust.works 4 points 18 hours ago

They'll be selectively read to. American kids can't actually read well these days, and this will do nothing to change that.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah its ironic that the actual teachings of jesus and the gospel are about as far from Christo-fascism as one can be.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

AFAIK they won't read the Bible directly, they'll read excerpts. So basically Republicans are curating only the parts they think fit their needs and are leaving out context that could completely flip the lesson on its head.

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The teachings of Jesus are extremely woke at the same time. "Loving everyone unconditionally", "not caring if someone's doing religion wrong or thinking differently"?

[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This can't be real. Tell me this isn't real.

[–] Lorindol@sopuli.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago

I am strongly against pushing any religion to anyone. This is fucked up.

Cherry picked parts of the book spiced with conservative lies being stuffed into young minds is pure evil.

But if they actually managed to get the kids read the entire book, that could be a good thing. I read the Bible out of curiosity when I was in school and it was the most effective inoculation against theism I can think of.

[–] GoTeamBoobies@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I mean the pro is if they actually read the Bible maybe they'll realize its not all anti everything, and stop using it out of context. Actually care about others?

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's a dangerous difference between critical bible analysis and guided bible study.

With how cryptic it is and how heavy on metaphors and parables, interpretation and contextualisation are important aspects of actually understanding the text, and the context sometimes isn't directly in the text but in the environment (time, place, recent events, social group) it was written in, or in other texts the writers expected their peers to be familiar with.

Critical analysis needs to investigate and consider thay extra-textual context. Guided study can explain it, but it can also omit or twist it. Critical analysis shouldn't just pick out individual passages. Guided study can cherry-pick the parts I want you to read.

For example, consider the story of the good Samaritan: A guy gets robbed, beaten half dead and left in the ditch. Two priests walk by and ignore him. Then another guy (the titular Samaritan) comes by, helps him, cleans his wounds and pays for an inn to take care of him. The whole thing is told in response to the question "if I'm supposed to love my neighbour, who is my neighbour?"

I could frame it as Jesus telling that Rabbi "neighbour means peers, and the priests walking by had no obligation to help the peasant because he's not their peer; let the rabble take care of each other and worry about your own". I could also, however, point out that Samaritans and Jews had a religious conflict, oil and wine weren't as cheap as they would be today and two full days labourers' wages are not a sum of money to sneeze at. In that context, the point isn't about peers and obligations but about how this guy helped a potential enemy at some expense, because that's who you're supposed to love: People whose humanity transcends borders, religious enmity and personal profit.

So depending on how I spin it, I can use it to encourage division and elitism, or to tell you that Muslim immigrants deserve your kindness and help too.

This is a bit of an extreme example (I hope; though I wouldn't be surprised to learn otherwise), but having been in "bible study", I can tell you that there absolutely are people willing and able to make the text fit their agenda quite convincingly.

I have zero faith thay this will actually be reading the bible critically so much as cherry-picked indoctrination.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

"The devil can cite scripture for his purpose."

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

They already do. That's why they keep aggressively breaking the law to try to force the government to be what they want it to be.

But yes, make them miserable. If you don't want to live in a secular country you can emmigrate

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

If it helps, the rest of the world hate your country too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In my Texas high school, many decades ago now, my English teacher made us read the bible, saying that it was only for its literary and historical value. It had nothing to do with how she was an extremely religious Mormon.

Apparently.

At least it wasn't the official curriculum. Just her being an awful human.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why didn't you read the book of Mormon?

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

That's a sound logical argument that immediately exposes her hypocrisy, and it didn't occur to me to bring it up back then.

I totally would have, though. She caused a lot of problems due to her poor and biased teaching. I never understood the purpose of English classes back then, so I always asked a lot of questions that inevitably made her look bad. By the end of that class, she absolutely hated me and was marking my assignments worse than other people's, even when the criteria was purely objective. My father had to schedule a meeting with the Principal to get her to stop.

Or maybe she didn't teach the Book of Mormon partially because it obviously has zero literary merit. Every passage from it that I've read sounds like a person with an eighth grade education who is trying to sound like the King James version of the bible. I mean, "smite" (or smote) is a cool sounding word for a middle schooler, so a middle schooler who was trying to write a new book of the bible might use that word way more often than makes sense.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, well at least it's not some Middle Eastern religion, with funny hats and a sacred book, that builds big towers to noisily advertise itself to the people around it...

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

That worships the same god.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

but it's "our flavor of sharia law so it's good".

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Closer?

That is literally Sharia law (at least what bigots think sharia law is)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Damn Texas really looks like a shithole

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I'm over here in California where we aren't violating the Constitution, weed is legal, and my girlfriend has the same rights I do.

Sux to be from Texas.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›