this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
69 points (88.8% liked)

News

38156 readers
1652 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 37 points 2 days ago

I don't "do drugs" anymore. From now on, I'm "initiating a single-person study."

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

As usual, a case study is basically the bottom of the barrel you can get for efficacy of a treatment that's still published science. It doesn't mean it's bad science (it can often be quite useful); it just means that the general public should really be left out of it until there's e.g. a good meta-analysis.

Anyway, with that said, here's a link to the case study since CTV's seems to be malformatted.

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish the qualities of evidence tiers were taught in (at least) high school. Especially as so much information is increasingly at our fingertips. That plus moral philosophy.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

As someone educated in statistics, I have a pretty good idea about what you can learn from a sample size of one. It's about as close to nothing as you can get without it quite being nothing.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Everyone should be doing shrooms.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Except pilots, people driving vehicles, surgeons, EMTs, and quite a lot of other people, not to mention those of us who have a rough time on psychedelics.

Nothing suits everyone, and even for those who benefit from it, there's an appropriate time and place.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

Apply that to everything in the universe. 🙄

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

They should be accessible to everyone and destigmatized for sure.

Not everyone wants to do them though, and those people shouldn't.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except people with dormant or active mental illness.

[–] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk I've found shrooms to really help with my depression. Obviously with mental illness you should be careful about it more so than usual though

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

A close friend of mine, in his late 70s, was experiencing increasingly uniform, flat moods. This happens sometime to older people, due to neurotransmitter depletion. He microdosed on shrooms for a month and was back to his old, vibrant self for the better part of a year afterwards.

Another single-person study, but I give this anecdata a bit more weight because I know the guy well. If that's a placebo effect, I still want some.

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Single person study? Sounds totally legit and should be immediately rolled out to everyone. Clearly nothing bad could happen. /s

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Doesn’t “single person study” effectively mean they didn't die?