this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
68 points (98.6% liked)

politics

30198 readers
2205 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's because one, he has control over, so naturally, gotta put a stop to that. The other, he's sure won't happen, so it's safe to "support" it, in order to entice rubes into voting for him.

Again I say, this is a sheep in wolfs clothing. He's a more polished fetterman. You should not support him.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

He knows a national tax won't be happening.

[–] dangling_cat@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

We wayy past billionaire tax. We need logarithmic wealth tax with soft wealth cap.

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

While against the one in his own state. He is a two faced centrist, family friends with the Pelosi'. Won't get change electing him.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 5 points 20 hours ago

Get this guy outta here

[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago

We can’t trust politicians who are cozy with billionaires. Newsom has deep ties to lots of billionaires, including campaign finance. Billionaires are the enemy of working people and politicians need to treat them at least as a problem to be fixed if they want our trust.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

There absolutely should be taxes on the billionaire class: 50% capital gains over a certain amount, limitations on borrowing against stock assets, increased income tax on income over $1m, and no cutoff on social security tax, just to name a few. That class should not exist and taxes are a great way to move that forward.

[–] bloogoose@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

Gavin Newsom is the type of politician the people that use that "we'd be at brunch right now" line want.