this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
124 points (97.7% liked)

Europe

11396 readers
1620 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/31597508

Great timing and phrasing. "Be slow about slop development ooor.. Burn everyone and everything!"

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Localhorst86@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago

such a hard choice... /s

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Ez choice, as long as you're not corrupted and evil

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago
[–] plyth@feddit.org 3 points 17 hours ago

It doesn't matter. All available resources will be put into AI. The location of the data centers doesn't matter, the internet provides access. It can only be avoided by actively prohibiting it globally. But the nations don't look as if they would be ready to cooperate.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they expect us to choose data centers? Fucked up. And our elites are corrupt enough to do just that ...

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bezos literally said that once AI is good enough, it will solve all our problems.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Bezos: "it will solve all our problems."

Wow.

That is not optimism - it is religious fervor.

That has become a religion, or it might be more apt to say, a cult.

[–] kohlenstoff@feddit.org 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That cult is called Longtermism prominently supported by all your favorite tech feudal lords.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds deeply ironic, given that these people contribute most to destruction of Earth's climate. It would be best if they would stop flying jets altogether.

[–] msage@programming.dev 1 points 4 hours ago

And solve hunger, homelessness and help with mental issues.

Nah.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

It's quite literally what happened in Don't look up

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Slop machines that make everything horrendously expensive or self-preservation? Hmmmm. I know which I would choose.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly "inevitable" changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.

  • loss of employment? Check.
  • profound change to living conditions? Check.
  • loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
  • threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
  • increasing likelihood of war? Check.
  • threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
  • threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
  • Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.

It's as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the "accusation in a mirror" pattern.

[–] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What I find most damning isn't that the mentally ill ruling class doesn't care about us peasants. It's their utter disregard for the future of their own offspring. Why the fuck are these people bringing new life to the planet they're actively racing to destroy? Genuinely mind-boggling.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s their utter disregard for the future of their own offspring.

Also disregard for our living planet and all life on it. Which is, take note, the only place we know in the universe that life exists there.

It is not only a cult - it is a death cult.

[–] AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I actually don't find that surprising as much. They will be dead by the time the worst shit hits the fan. Right now their money can still buy them comfort, so all they care about is their sick little games. However, their children and grandchildren will be cooking like the rest of us.

[–] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

They will be dead by the time the worst shit hits the fan.

I am not so sure about that one. Things are already degrading pretty fast.

[–] androidul@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

how much time do we have to spend in this era of AI evolution, where tf is the reset button and why hide it ffs

[–] manxu@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago

If only all choices were this easy! Choosing between AI and climate goals is like choosing between a shit sandwich with a side of barbed wire spaghetti vs a gourmet meal.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Give the planet over to a probability matrix which is based on the collective works of lifeforms (us) who require that planet to survive...

OR choose to keep surviving and creating your own works, on that planet.

[–] kernkurios@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

Just for my synapses, currently fried under this heat dome, the question boils down to this: would I rather suffer a bit more for the sake of AI, or for the prospect that things might actually get better on this planet again? So, it’s a straight-up choice between selfishness and the collective good - and well, we know just how brilliantly those kinds of questions work out for our species :/

[–] joelthelion@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well, alright πŸ˜ƒ

[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 2 points 1 day ago

I think the choice is obvious

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Ok, but think about all the profits the ai companies are making, and all the tax revenue they will pay to fund healthcare, social security and public schools! /s

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Both may be possible if the production of hardware, services and electricity can be performed ecologically meaningful.

[–] BallyM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They may have overplayed their hand.