this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
395 points (99.5% liked)

pics

28876 readers
514 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Hong Kong housing complex.

It sure is!

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Not gonna lie, I don’t think that’s enough recreation space for the number of units there.

And I don’t see any commercial space at all. That’s got to be enough units for several thousand people. Like, think about how much store space would be needed to make sure they could get all their groceries.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don’t think that’s enough recreation space for the number of units there.

Yeah, I got that impression as well. Looks heavily overbuilt, with the amenities being more there to attract new residents than to serve the community.

And I don’t see any commercial space at all.

Probably because this is a top down view at the center of a ring of impossibly tall housing units, not a skyline view of Hong Kong, a city that's got commercial spaces from seaside to Shenzhen.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, that’s kind a huge issue in Hong Kong, like, how concentrated the commercial areas get. Creates a lot of unnecessarily long travel from housing to commercial, culminating in a lot of pedestrian congestion along stairways, elevators and escalators.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pedestrian congestion is a big problem in lots of major urban centers. Go down to Shibuya Crossing in Tokyo or Times Square in NYC and you'll find the same problem of big crowds of people clogging areas that weren't designed to accommodate the sheer volume of traffic.

Idk if I'd call it "unnecessarily long travel" so much as "a necessary consequence of this many people living in a limited space". If you don't want that level of crowding, you've got to move outside this hyper-dense city.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, NYC has a fairly healthy level of pedestrian traffic in most areas. Times Square is mostly just full of tourists. I’m not as familiar with Tokyo but my understanding is a a lot of the more dense areas have a sort of 2/3 level layout of commercial, but there is level interconnects or they’re set up in conjunction with transit. So like, there are fairly large underground commercial strips at subway level, or sky bridges between blocks for 2nd story commercial.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

They all get backed up during rush hour. It took me ten minutes to get into Shinjuku station one sunny afternoon, because that corner of town was so crammed with people.

Similarly, if you've ever been in the subway tunnels of NYC or DC, you'll know when a game lets out at Madison Square or a parade is happening though the Washington Mall, because these otherwise spacious underground enclaves are stuffed with people.

At some point, you have an issue of induced demand. These urban centers are designed to encourage the free flow of pedestrian traffic and... that's exactly what they create.

load more comments (1 replies)

Tennis games are 50 vs 50

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Not everyone plays tennis and the commercial spaces would be on the first level facing the road, not the inner courtyard. Good complaints in general but not really applicable here.

[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I also think those recreational spaces may be raised from street level. The perspective is not not meant to show any of that. Could be grocery stores etc. below it as well.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hypnotoad_@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Courts are full again, damn!

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They were all empty when I looked out my window. Full by the time I got there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nehal3m@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Beats living on the streets.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

...yeah, urban hellscapes are pretty bleak but it's obvious someone tried here to make the best they could of what they had to work with...dense as it is in hong kong, the other nice thing is that you don't have to travel too far to experience open parklands...

[–] deathmetaldawgy@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh come on… Hellscape is pretty dramatic don’t you think? I don’t wanna hear that from anyone who hasn’t been to America…

I know it’s played out at this point but the building I’m working in is 10x worse than this and they keep letting one company build them and block the view of the river !!! We could use some more trees and tennis courts here!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago

For summer.

Pool's closed for ever.

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Echo5@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And stingrays

[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

This is cool and all but it also triggered my fear of falling specifically so fuck you. Still a neat picture.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yesterday I tried to watch a How Ridiculous video (I have mixed feelings about them but they've metaphorically grown on me). In this particular one they're experimenting with the Magnus effect by throwing things off of a cliff.

They've done similar things before, mostly off of what they say is the highest dam in the world. However ... That has at least a guardrail. This was just a cliff and they had to stand right at the edge of it with no PPE.

I tried to endure but when they opened an umbrella over the drop I had to turn it off. It was surprising to me; they're usually at least half decent about safety. At the beginning of this video, one of them even commented on his "jelly legs."

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was having the same fear. Good news! I watched to the end, and spotted the safety ropes they all had on them. They were safe the whole time. Even Scott.

I wish they'd pointed it out clearly, because they are an example to lots of kids. However, it seems they were not in fact totally stupid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

This looks like one of my Cities:Skylines cities.

[–] orenj@leminal.space 14 points 3 days ago

Thats a lot of house

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I bet people there interact with other humans more often than suburbanites who only ever leave their property in a car.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Holy shit that looks and feels depressing. Let's give as little as possible to the peasants?

Sure, there are some activity spaces there for a small fraction of the people to enjoy, but that is nowhere near enough, and even then of course there is a road going through it

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Holy shit that looks and feels depressing.

It's an interior shot from a forced perspective. If you're in a unit looking out on the city or at street level mixing with a crowd, I suspect the vibe is very different.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure it'll be different

I'm also sure it's Efron depressing still. I count some 13 buildings there, each likely over 250 apartments, each apartment likely an average of 3 persons, you do the math. That is a LOT of people with very little recreation area

Then the view... You can see a few hundred neighbors, and that is about it. I can make a fair guess that the other side of these apartments aren't going to have a much better view either

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I count some 13 buildings there, each likely over 250 apartments, each apartment likely an average of 3 persons, you do the math. That is a LOT of people with very little recreation area

In the courtyard, maybe. No idea what it looks like outside this tower block.

You can see a few hundred neighbors, and that is about it.

From the inside window, sure. From the outside window, presumably you can see something different.

I also have no idea what the rent is in a place like this. Or the utilities. Or space of each unit. Or any other amenities the building might have. I don't even know what the interior looks like. Very hard to judge based on a single shot of a single wall from a weird angle.

[–] makefile@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Anyone else surprised by how empty the courts are?

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

The photo may have been taken at 5 in the morning or some equally unsociable hour for playing sports.

I assume the photographer wanted the courts and streets as empty as possible to create the right mood for the shot

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

You could also just take a couple of pictures and if people are moving, do an image stack and it removes the people from the images. Pretty classic technique to get rid of people from busy photos. These days you could also just use AI to remove people from pictures as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] masterclass@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No, because it's 6:30am bro

[–] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There are probably thousands of people living in those surrounding buildings. Not two of them get up early for a game of tennis before work?

Maybe they are not all allowed to use the courts.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Not two of them get up early for a game of tennis before work?

Not if the courts are closed off so the photographer can get a clean shot.

[–] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

i remember i lived in an apartment complex with a pool. we only had three warm months out of the year and i never used the pool anyway

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InterestingUsername@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Love the angle

[–] rimu@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

despite all my rage...

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This is mesmerizing. But I just can’t help but wonder how full those tennis courts will be. Or maybe not all the apartments have access to the courts.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I can see my house from here!

load more comments
view more: next ›