this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
157 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30194 readers
2416 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

The Republican base is angry, too. Everybody's angry.

Our parties are not concerned, they are making a FORTUNE. Openly, they don't even bother to hide it any longer.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago

The base isn't the same as the mogul constituents that the Democratic leadership cares about.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

It would be an astounding change in policy if they were.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

Sounds like an attitude problem in the electorate. Do they want republicans to win? It is selfish to think that politicians should earn your vote. I mean, that's some elementary school level conception of democracy. Grow up already.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No is the simple answer. But voting and elections are not going to fix the problems the usa has created for itself. Its not just drumpf.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Dems don’t want to sell that reality. They want to whip up their base to vote harder so that they can squander another supermajority on something dumb, like giving Israel more arms to genocide. Then Israel re-initiates the Iran war so that the can Dems can be in charge of losing.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No.

George W. Bush stood alongside Obama at the opening of the latter's Presidential library instead of swinging from the gallows back in '08, which is what needed to happen if we were to save America.

Instead, we're fucked. The Dems ain't listening.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Absolutely correct. And I was the only one among my friends writing to, emailing, and calling politicians to try to get them to do it.

Then we need to force them to listen to us, by any means necessary

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Democratic Party is a honey trap to capture and neutralize progressive policies and politicians, and to make sure the “Overton Window” of American politics never moves left. The leadership runs cover for Republicans because they have the same donors and the same agenda. How many times do they need to invent some mechanism to allow them to steal defeat out of the jaws of victory for it to form a clear composite picture of collaboration?

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

While I do think we know there's some truth to all that, it's clear voting matters otherwise the Republican party wouldn't be trying to rig it every fucking chance they get, and the DNC wouldn't have been going so apeshit over Bernie in 2016. He threatened the establishment and they had to attack their own constituents and call them Bernie bros to get things back "on track".

It's not so black and white. There's Democrat politicians who range from zero to one as controlled opposition, and as supporters of the establishment and the status quo. People are more complex than that. They have their own goals and some of them did not join politics just to make a buck, and some of them are just plain cowards or are too far separated from their constituents to realize what they want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe, but you’ll notice how the Republicans were able to take over their party and turn it into exactly what they wanted; a loony tunes racist circus. Don’t see why Democrats can’t do the same.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 15 points 1 week ago

Oh I can answer that for you. The answer is no.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Then we will force them to pay attention

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Does that "base" bribe the politicians? No? So why should they care?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

To be clear, for those reading, the DSA is structured as a party and could act as an independent party if necessary, but they mainly run candidates in democratic primaries as they recognize that doing so is a more practical way to win elections in the short term.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The people how vote in primaries chooses the direction of the party.

Look at the republicans they saw what the base wanted now they’re all loyal to MAGA.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Except everyone doesnt have the opportunity to vote in primaries because this backwards ass country makes voting in general overly complicated/inconvenient on purpose.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Livid with rage" would be the more accurate description.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

“Burnt out from rage” is closer to me but yeah

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

angry doesnt quite cover it.

[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I'm surprised the magazine couldn't find the answer. But of course it is a shill for lib views anyhow.

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not that I can tell. Establishment Dems do nothing but disappoint. How bad at your job do you have to be to lose to Trump?

Then kick them out, we need some newer and more competent leaders in charge

load more comments
view more: next ›