66
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by TheBaldness@beehaw.org to c/support@beehaw.org

I'm out of the loop. Are we federating with Threads or not?

EDIT: The answer is no, we are not federating with Threads. Thank you. That's the answer I was hoping for.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] admin@beehaw.org 125 points 8 months ago
[-] newtraditionalists@beehaw.org 29 points 8 months ago

Damn, i love beehaw

[-] fckgwrhqq2yxrkt@beehaw.org 27 points 8 months ago

And this is why I choose beehaw. A well defined set of ethics that are actually followed is way too rare.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 11 points 8 months ago

Not sure about ethics, but if the argument of "excessive moderation overhead" still holds true for staying defederated from Lemmy.world, the same should apply a thousandfold for Threads.

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

yeah i mean this is the veto even if we wanted to do this (which we don't) and even if the community wanted it (which they clearly don't seem to--nobody's clamored for us to federate with Threads). even a tiny fraction of a fraction of threads being involved with our site would probably top the peak of workload we had when Lemmy took off. there is no current realistic circumstance in which we'd ever choose to or be able to federate with them.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

You guys are not federated with lemmy.world‽

Doesn't that exclude a LOT of content?

[-] anothermember@beehaw.org 13 points 8 months ago

It cuts out a lot of spam and low-effort posting.

[-] PaddleMaster@beehaw.org 13 points 8 months ago

I have a Beehaw account and another that federates with .world. I enjoy my Beehaw account much more, to the point I almost never use the other account. There’s just much more valuable content here.

I do miss some of the more niche Reddit subs i frequented before the purge. That’s probably the only thing really lacking. And it probably more a testament to how busy I’ve been this year. I just don’t have the time to explore other instance’s communities that Beehaw does federate with.

[-] Penguincoder@beehaw.org 10 points 8 months ago

There is a big difference between a lot of content and quality content. I appreciate Beehaw for our quality, not the quantity. There are certainly some great content on other instances, but sorting through the crap noise to find the good, just isn't worth my effort.

[-] _MusicJunkie@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago

Couldn't tell you, what am I missing?

[-] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Hard to name anything specific, it's just that most of the content I see scrolling through the feed is from lemmy.world communites or users.

[-] Crankpork@beehaw.org 20 points 8 months ago

Direct and to the point.

[-] Caliper@beehaw.org 18 points 8 months ago

I love this kind of no nonsense answer. Reading the title made me worried there would be endless discussions coming, but this is refreshing.

[-] mnglw@beehaw.org 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

thank you, I'm glad you went with the short answer, leaving absolutely no room for doubt or discussion

this is good, I'm tired of the endless discussions full of goalposts being moved

[-] toothpicks@beehaw.org 12 points 8 months ago
[-] Auzy@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago

I assumed that would be the case. It is difficult to find a non toxic section of Facebook

[-] NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org 5 points 8 months ago
[-] rwhitisissle@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago

Thank you, Chris.

[-] hedge@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago
[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago

Just out of curiosity, which Lemmy instances are federating with Threads? It's going to be an interesting thing to... observe.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

And defederate from, you mean.

[-] cole 1 points 8 months ago

I think it could have a place for some things. Not sure yet

[-] PlasticExistence@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago

Lemmy.world was taking a "let's wait and see" stance towards them last I checked. This is after the community asked them to not federate with Threads.

[-] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh, that's nice. Realistically, LW probably has the most chances of weathering a massive user onslaught, they kind of had to do it already, so hopefully could extend the same actuation protocols.

From what I understand from the video, Threads is also going to do it in several phases, starting with allowing the fediverse to follow a select few people on Threads, then allowing more people to get followed, then bidirectional messaging, then following anyone from anywhere.

They're also pairing it with Threads launch in Europe, then citing it as a reason along "compliance" and "scrutiny on our company", which IMHO is the main reason they're doing any of this at all, since the EU seems to want open communication protocols and crack down on these international social behemots. The stepped approach means people on the fediverse will first be able to follow people on Threads, before the reverse happens, so content creators and influencers (or politicians) will want to use a Threads account to have a larger reach... which is how Meta might try to lure people off Mastodon, but we'll see.

PS: the video in this post: https://mastodon.social/@mosseri@threads.net/111579802298134707

this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
66 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2794 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS