this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
416 points (99.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

8226 readers
233 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Xerxes I dug this from ~~scrap metal~~ Mount Athos in ~~a cave~~ 492 BCE!

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

Seriously, with the money burned there couls be a ubdersea Pipelinenrywork that spans the globe by now.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That’s a 10 year project if it wasn’t in a war zone.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What if, What if... and hear me out, we use Nukes to Dig?

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Designer of fusion bomb, want to dig huge hole and canal and harbor using his bomb.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

It's not "just a bombbbbb".

It also makes holes!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

10??? Lol.

No it's not "10".

[–] LORDSMEGMA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just operation plowshare it in a few months

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You get irradiated oil and you get irradiated oil and you get cancer

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The oil won't be irradiated, just the area it has to go through and also the food supply for a few billion people who eat fish from the surrounding area.

[–] fist_of_fartitude@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

.. .but the oil will be ok, right?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah the oil will be fine so we can push on with the plan.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That mountain?

Rock and stone

[–] JstAnthrUsr@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago
[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago
  1. Takes time, and probably more money than Iran would ask for in tolls.
  2. Still within drone range, so won't necessarily stop Iran
  3. Oil wells are within drone range, so even if shipping is solved Iran could still blow up oil production.
  4. Very expensive, especially if Iran folds in a month.
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Ah! Tunnel under the mountain and send the oil on submarines! Brilliant!

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

This gets the NCD seal of approval: 🦭

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Damn it, I was hoping to comment "INB4 Project Plowshare," but nope!

I should've known better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be a better solution to build a pipeline moving oil to SA‘s east coast but missing port infrastructure means it would take decades

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

plus a pipeline is easy to sabotage and destroyed with bombs or missiles.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 8 points 1 week ago

What’s never mentioned in these discussions is the UAE actually built a railway that bypasses the straight of Hormuz.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pump the water up over the mountain. Put a turbine at the bottom on the other side. According to the law of conservation of energy, you'll generate the exact amount of power to pump the water up, so it wouldn't even cost anything to run.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

At this point I can’t even tell if you’re serious

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why even pump it? Let it evaporate naturally, and it will eventually just rain down on its own.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The boats need the water pumped to ride the current up the mountain.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

You make a compelling argument, sir.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are not completely efficient in energy, we lose a lot in the process. You will take more, and how do you not know that already?

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know it's an unstable part of the world but I think if you had a strong enough military presence around the pumping and turbine stations you could reduce the energy losses to a negligible amount.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Energy losses are due to resistance. Military can't do shit.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Energy losses are due to resistance

This is exactly why a military presence is needed. If the military can quell the resistance force fighting against the canal/waterway, then the energy losses from sabotage and theft would be minimized. A strong military presense is the only way to deal with this problem.

No military is capable of defeating thermodynamics - resistance has known activity on every region on the planet, and apparently on every body in the galaxy too. Just the cost of sending an occupation force to Jupiter would be ruinous, let alone Afghanistan.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you fucking with me? Specific resistance refers to the conductors, copper, aluminum, silver, etc. An amount is lost to to it, and over long distances it adds up.

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

Yes. This is a NCD post about building a 200km canal through mountians. I understand that pumping water through a mountian range will not work to transport tanker ships.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

But image how many jobs this could create!! 🤯

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

US wanted to do something similar with nukes in the 60s

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

There's a number of cities there now, so it's not really an option anymore.

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Project Plowshare - the ultimate hammer looking for a nail.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The Ben Gurion Canal was a plan to bypass the Suez by blasting a canal with nukes, through what is now israel

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

ploughshare

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Not gonna lie getting a big budget to fuck around with explosives in the desert sounds like a dream job.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I am looking at a map of the world. And that makes me realize... The Earth is FLAT!!!

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago

This is how shoplifting works in the large.

Laughs at mountain in Roman

[–] MrFlibble4747@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Why so far back, just dig it near the "nipple" end FFS.

Jeez, what a bunch of maroons!

load more comments
view more: next ›