this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
245 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31040 readers
1804 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That dilemma stems from newly proposed USPS rules that seek to comply with an executive order President Donald Trump signed this spring to crack down on mail-in voting. If courts let the order stand, it would give the federal government an unprecedented role in elections — and could put even more voter data in the hands of Trump officials searching for supposed election fraud.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago

Wow, another illegal move by the fascist party. Can't wait for SCOTUS to fuck the states yet again.

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 72 points 2 months ago

"If I can't find election fraud... I'll make election fraud!"

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The executive branch doesn’t run or control the post office. Of course that won’t stop them from trying. Wondering who will bring the first lawsuit.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 25 points 2 months ago

the feds don't run states' elections either, even for federal offices.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

You need to catch up on the last decade or so. Dejoy did irreperable damage. Biden blamed inactivity on not being able to intervene with board of governors. Trump does so without reservation of course. New dickhead postmaster general was a FedEx board member who's tasked with setting the USPS up to fail and force a privatization play... And make the uniforms more "hot" as trump directed.

Here's some of the story: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/11/22/twcq-n22.html

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Fun fact, the postal service is older than the US government.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How 'bout them states' rights, conservatives?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

They would just say the USPS is federal

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Trump wants postal service to block mail in ballots for states that don't suck up to his rules"

Same reality, highlighting the insanity of the actor.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Not just suck up to the rules like they are arbitrary.

In this case, they want those voter rolls so they can suppress votes and persecute political opponents.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Watching the wildly slow ramp up to a breakup of the US in whatever form it takes is agonizing, shits been coming for a hot minute and we’ve blown by the few potential off-ramps.

My money is on a Balkan style civil war

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Personally I think we'll see a civil war for a bit but it'll burn out relatively quickly due to lack of fuel, then we may see a troubles like situation for a bit in some regions.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The troubles is my second most likely bet, being real I had figured there would be more outrage and action already so my predictions may be tainted by hope in humanity

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think at this point we're on this weird razor edge of instability where everything is going to shit but it isn't quite bad enough to outright cause the whole thing to collapse, so everyone is sitting around just kinda waiting. Personally I subscribe to the addage "The fall of empire is slow until it's not" so this type of shit was always a distinct possibility. I do think there's a chance shit will come to a head either when the stock market implodes or when something unseen kicks in and causes issues.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t disagree at all, I think I underestimated how placated the American public(myself included) were and how much that would drive us to just keep on with our daily routines. Eventually something will break but I can’t see what might be anymore. Gas prices and the midterms will be interesting indicators, $7 a gallon in Tennessee or the like might cause something in rural areas while election denial claims if the DNC wins big in November could prompt a crisis on the state gov level. But limbo is where we are right now for sure

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honestly if I'm being completely realistic it probably won't be a major thing that kicks off balkanization or whatever but moreso a straw that broke the camels back type thing. It could very well be something stupid like Trump dying and the power struggle on the right ripping apart whatever little internal cohesion remains. Or it could just be just a police shooting and subsequent protest spiraling into a succession crises followed by balkanization.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Regardless of what the turning point is I feel it’s locked in at this point in some form

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago

I stand for postal neutrality.

[–] VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

If the judiciary doesn't block this implementation, I think we're basically cooked. I think the federal Republic will functionally cease to exist and we'll slowly disintegrate over time. I have no idea whether that process will be violent. But I'm not confident that it won't be.

We live in a dystopia and it's so disappointing and stupid. When I think about the sacrifices people like my grandparents made during the civil rights movement to secure the rights and liberties we enjoy, this wildly precipitous regression breaks my heart.

Yes, progress isn't linear. This is well-understood. And I don't have the benefit of lived experience to know whether this bout of regression is fundamentally worse or different. But I am well-read and well-acquainted with history. My feeling is that we could lose it all.

Fortunately, I am often wrong. I hope I am this time.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So what’s stopping states from sending ballots via ups or fedex? Like I know that’s more expensive but if democracy and privacy are at stake is this an option for the short term?

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ignoring legal hurdles like ballot harvesting, and ignoring that ballots must be postmarked to be considered valid—which means this whole situation would require the USPS, which is currently cooperating with the administration, to actually go behind their back and organize a system of postmarking then handing them off to a private company for delivery—it’s only possible if UPS or FedEx will accept them.

Will a giant private company accept a bunch of responsibility and do something altruistic that is also anti-Republican Party? Tune in to find out!

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Postmarking no longer counts towards the deadline of things like tax returns, I am guessing voting as well.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mail in ballots still require postmarks edit, unless you’re dropping them off by hand. That’s an incorrect guess and a misunderstanding of postmarks.

Your tax returns are considered timely if you hand them over to the USPS by the deadline. The postmark date was used as evidence to this point. The USPS clarified that postmarking wouldn’t be happening until your mail arrived at sorting facilities, so even if you technically dropped it in a blue box on the right date it may not get postmarked til later. That’s not really a change; obviously there are no little people employed to hide inside and stamp mail you drop in a hole. There’s also a last collection time written on all the boxes. However, distances between collection points and sorting facilities is increasing and transportation in some cases is getting less frequent. Also operations is less well staffed and the policy announcement is masking operational delays. As always if you want something stamped with the date you go to the window at a post office before they close.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

It was at stake in 2024, people couldn't give two shits then. Why would they now when more and more obstacles are being thrown in the way by the shitbags they allowed into power in the first place.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Let's see the lawyers do their work.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wow that really sucks. I'm living abroad and do not want to have to fly back home to vote

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

vote. mail it in. and be a part of the class action suit. this “rule” won’t last.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago

This is not looking good

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I see USPS' lawyers will be busy... Hopefully Congress reimburses them for all the lawsuits.

[–] Shortrib@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The US postal service has enough financial problems without dropping a new job on them.

[–] FullPenguin@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

USPS is not a business, and therefore not required to be profitable.

Furthermore, USPS's financial problems that consistently make headlines were manufactured by a 2006 federal act that required them to prefund health and retirement benefits 75 years in advance. The policy was a republican gift to private shipping companies (UPS, FedEx, etc), it was repealed under Biden.

Although they are still stuck with the contract Trump 1 saddled them with for awful and expensive delivery vehicles.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Although they are still stuck with the contract Trump 1 saddled them with for awful and expensive delivery vehicles.

The replacement procurement process was started in January 2015, before Trump. And the contract itself was signed by Biden in 2021.

Do you have anything to back up the NGDV being awful? Because from everything I can find that's not the case. They're much safer (airbags, anti-lock brakes, and crumple zones), and have Air Conditioning. The commentary I can find from actual USPS workers seems pretty positive. Most of the complaints are more from armchair redditors about the design, which is obviously secondary to the utility for this type of use case. Or they are complaints about the 10/90 BEV/ICE procurement split decided by the Trump admin, citing cost... even though the price difference was only about $3 Billion. Not actually complaints about the NGDV itself being a bad replacement for the LLV.

The NGDV uses modern components, has modern safety features (the old LLV basically had none), and it's available with both an ICE and BEV powertrain, and the ICE option can be swapped out later to the BEV, it's not stuck being a gas powered vehicle forever.

The old Grumman LLV has needed a replacement for decades. Anecdotally, I had two spontaneously catch fire in front on our house several years ago, about a month or so apart from failed components, likely due to age. Maintaining them cost a fortune because of that.

Mail delivery is a near perfect use case for a BEV. Nearly identical routes every day, less than 70 miles total, with known time and distances. And long times of non-use overnight to charge the batteries, no fast charge needed.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

Mortal Kombat announcer: FACTUALITY

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 3 points 2 months ago

I thought they were going to deploy like 80% of the fleet as BEV but Trump decided it should be more like 80% ICE. Conversions later, who and when and how much? Vs just getting the right thing from the beginning? Trump's hatred of renewables fucked up the process just like so many others.

[–] Shortrib@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

There is a financial anchor jamming up postal operations, however you want to describe it.

https://www.npr.org/2026/03/17/nx-s1-5750419/usps-running-out-of-money-postal-service-david-steiner

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

You must be new… …to everything