this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21700 readers
1257 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/50517085

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It goes real well with the earring

I can sort of understand their logic. That's no longer a beach, just a sea of plastic.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago
[–] manxu@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I went and dug up Italian articles. The backstory is that there was a devastating fire due to human causes, so they came up with the umbrella ban to make access unpalatable and limit human occupation.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

You don't even need Italian articles, it's in the OP

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

they keep talking about how it's for ecological protection but never explain what one thing has to do with the other. how does limiting umbrellas protect the environment?

[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

It deters people from going to the beach. Masses of people usually aren't good for the environment.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unless I'm missing something, it's literally just that they think a beach full of umbrellas is ugly.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not that people might leave them behind and junk up the beach and ocean?

I could believe any of these reasons, honestly.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A beach umbrella doesn't seem like the kind of thing often left behind, whereas many smaller items would be. Still, based on the evident size of that beach, the effort seems fairly trivial for a public employee to take a quick look after closing time such as to remove potential umbrellas left behind.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You'd think, but people leave behind the dumbest/most useful things sometimes.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

My 2nd sentence covers that possibility, tho.

[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

I feel for the officials who had to make this decision because it's a hard one. They have to balance the preservation of their environment with the influx of people onto the beach.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 13 points 2 days ago

This is far removed from coherent thought.

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Sure and next year they start renting them out.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can you have a pop up tent?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it's specifically forbidden, along with portable gazebos.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No mention of yurts?

Sweet!

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What about a shack? Is that allowed?

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Think of the children under 10!

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago

And the children over 65 clearly don't take any shit from City Hall.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

They are.. they get umbrellas.