this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
353 points (98.6% liked)

PC Gaming

15164 readers
195 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@piefed.ca 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

phone resolution is only 240x320. do it again at 1600x1200 (what my 19in trinitron from that era runs at), or even just 1024x768.

[–] Stampy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

To be fair, not far from your average crt monitor in 1998, maybe 640 x 480.

[–] bnsqc@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

It's four times smaller, though, so enough to make a significant difference

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

800x600 was perfectly fine on my (family computer) 1997* era ATi Rage Pro 8MB AGP (funnily enough, it was slightly slower than the PCI version) card for Half Life 1. 1024x768 too but less FPS. Quake 3 Arena ran better.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I ran Half-Life at 400x300, because I didn't even had a 3D accelerator.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What?! Was I so privileged to have a 720p CRT at the time? (ok well not literally 720p, but a higher resolution 4:3... 800x600)

... actually remembering it, it was probably well after 1998, but I have plenty of memories going, "mmmm, 800x600". maybe even more at 1024x768.

I only really started to understand what it all meant and how neat better resolution was with Unreal Tournament, so... definitely post 1999

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

800x600 is 600p. 720p is 1280x720

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

600p should be 1024 × 600 (WSVGA), perhaps someone also uses it for 800 × 600 (SVGA). In any case, nobody used that notation back in the day, that came in the 2000s with 720p.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In my defense it was 720i for a good while for tv signals ;P Also different aspect ratios than a lot of even excellent CRTs.

[–] mrbigmouth502@piefed.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Who actually ran HL1 at 1600x1200 or 1024x768 in 1998 unless they had a high-end PC? The minimum requirements basically expect 320x240.

As an aside, I'm really, really tired of people quoting the larger number after the smaller number for landscape resolutions. X goes BEFORE Y, damn it! I know this is the publication's fault, because they did the same thing in a different article.

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

N95 and other phones in that series were a different set of beasts. I remember those phones playing videos with much higher resolution than its screen resolution. My first android smart phone in 2014 did not managed to do that.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Miss the days that companies strived to give you the best hardware.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had Quake 3 Arena running on my N95, when the phone was still relevant, someone ported all 3 Quakes to it and they ran really well. I know people are glazing it in this thread but it was such a great example of why Nokia died.

It had a proper PowerVR GPU, same one as the iPhone. Should have been great… except the OS didn’t even use it. Most games neglected to as well. When they did use it, like with NGage or OVI titles they worked great, but the OS and apps felt as dated and laggy as ever thanks to S60.

Had great Bluetooth support, full A2DP when iPhones couldn’t even change volume over Bluetooth. But Bluetooth headphones had limited battery life, usually only 1-2 hours in that era. What happens when they die? Auto-pause? No, IMMEDIATELY play your music over the loudest speaker in the world in the middle of the subway.

Why put in such advanced hardware and not take advantage of it properly? Because the OS & Hardware teams didn’t talk to each other. Apparently hardware would dictate features, OS would code to support them and nobody was looking at the big picture.

[–] Devconsole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the context!

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, old Nokias were just peak. The E70 is still my favourite phone I've ever had, and I'm so sad about their downfall in general. At this point I've probably fully gotten used to a touchscreen, but I still miss that full QWERTY physical keyboard. Typed faster on that than I ever seem to be able to on a touch keyboard, even with autocorrect.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Yaky@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

Saving this to repost as response to ignorant "Apple invented smartphones" / "there were no smartphones before iPhone"

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, I love relics of the old internet. I know it's hard to believe for the younger generations but... this place used to be good.

[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same :)

You may also like https://wiby.org/surprise/

Loads random old sites on each visit. Many don't support https, so browser warnings ahoy.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 2 points 1 month ago

I was just about to say this would be a great post for !webrevival@lemm.ee but... yeah :/

Shame it hasn't been revived at another instance as far as I know.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And a modern phone can match about a 1000 Cray Supercomputers.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

That's cray cray * 500.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got a blackberry pearl and explained to my kids that it had better specs than my first PC in every category except screen size.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

And if you'd had a Osborne, not even that.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

i wouldn't say it matchs pcs as other have pointed out, still impressive and i say we should use half-life as the next step in putting games on small devices we shouldn't be able to. as a step up if we already have doom on it.

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I had the Nokia N95 BTW. Its a fantastic phone. I don't know what magic they did to run Half-Life, to run the game on that phone. ... reading the article further, ahh, its no emulation. They have an unofficial Open Source engine that is compatible with the engine used in Half-Life to build a native version.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Makes me wonder what age of PC modern phones compare to. Shame that it's often a pain to get Linux on them

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depends on what you're going for. But the a19 pro in the iPhone 17 is a legit beast compared to a few gen old laptop.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/compare/18267048?baseline=18268036

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The new MacBook Neo uses an A18 rather than an M series.

It’s all the same thing. Just higher or lower end. It’s like a pentium vs a core i

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd say about now, maybe just a few years behind. Phones come with 16gb of ram l, which is the most common config on steam. There are native ports on iOS. You can play resident evil 8 natively on an iPhone, you can emulate Cyberpunk 2077 on a high end Android.

I'd venture to say that any modern game could be ported to arm with very little compromise, and as arm laptops become more common this gap will be smaller and smaller. The biggest hit for running windows games on Android is having to translate x86 calls to arm calls, an arm windows binary would only have to run through proton which in some cases runs games better than windows itself.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With FEX, which Valve is pushing forward, I expect translating to arm explicitly isn't going to be required soon. Pretty much everything will be able to run anywhere, as long as the hardware can handle it.

We just need the same thing for RISC-V, and then a push to that.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

oh man I loved my n95. it had its own T9 software that was amazing as well. and I actually miss typing with it at times. it was very fast.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It's coming to GBA one of these days.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago

xash3d is based