this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
350 points (96.5% liked)

Today I Learned

29986 readers
945 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically, the only modern studio consistently putting out stop motion animation movies, is Laika Studios. And yet, Laika has only had one financially successful movie, Coraline from 2009, while all their other movies have under performed.

However, Laika is currently led and owned by Travis Knight, son of Phil Knight, the owner of Nike. This has enabled Knight to continually bank roll Laika whenever they under perform, essentially making the entire stop motion animation film industry a nepo baby's pet project.

That being said, this is actually a positive story, and reminiscent of how artists previously would be financially supported by wealthy benefactors.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bassad@jlai.lu 6 points 10 hours ago

Aren't all artists dependent of some rich guys or rich guy's wifes?

I saw an art exhibition recently, I am not able to buy a 200€ pillow.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Are you not counting claymation? Because i'm sure that Wallace and grommit would like a word.

[–] _NetNomad@fedia.io 3 points 13 hours ago

i don't know the full story but iirc that was how the band Supertramp stayed afloat until they were successful, patronage from some rich guy

[–] Elshender@sh.itjust.works 85 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Me when people forget about Wallace and Gromit.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 10 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Would you like a spot of wensleydale old chum?

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Speaking of propping things up - Wensleydale were propped up by Wallace & Gromit.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Yes I heard they were failing until they got the free advertising. Me I'm a Y Fenni fan.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah because the truth is it's actually pretty rubbish cheese. I'm allowed to say that, you can't, but I can.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

Yarg best cheese or a blue west country Brie.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Bought some back when I lived in Scotland and Somerfield had a deal on multiple blocks of cheese. Didn't finish it.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If you have the one with cranberries, yes!

If you have one without cranberries, also yes!

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Cranberries, and other bits of crap, don't belong in cheese. Have them with your cheers by all means, but not in it. I like tomatoes and olives with a bit of cheese but I won't be buying a cheese that has formed some perverted union with them.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What do you mean „financially successful“? The movie Kubo from 2016 had more revenue than budget. Is that not successful?

It is a damn good movie btw.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Krelis_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that standard Hollywood accounting?

E.g. Return of the Jedi never made a profit either, on paper

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] B0rax@feddit.org 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, so basically Marketing is not included in the budget. And theaters take a big cut from the revenue.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

Yep. Things we normally don't look at when budget to revenue conversations happen.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

wait what.

oh whew i thought you were talking about my buddy who used to be at Will Vinton. he's not rich.

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like the type of things normal dudes say when asked what they'd do if they won the lottery. Maybe Travis is a normal dude under the nepotism?

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think that's what the last section of the post was referencing

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

yeah, the

reminiscent of how artists previously would be financially supported by wealthy benefactors.

i need to find myself a wealthy benefactor who likes [music form not appreciated outside one town in the eastern US and i like where i live dammit]

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

I think about this scene so much whenever I'm doing a project

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Aardman also produces stop-motion, so it is untrue that Laika is alone.

Not such a positive story for Will Vinton, who had a hostile takeover of his studio, and then was fired and replaced by the new owner’s son.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

i was trying to forget the Will Vinton fiasco. I had a friend there.

[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 112 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (29 children)

i heard about this on a podcast. it is great news for stop-motion, and considering how many shitty rich people there are, it's nice to know there's a couple good ones promoting art.

Also their movies are good and all but one of their movies made tens of millions of dollars.

for stop-motion, a very niche art-form, making 10-130 million dollars profit per film is laudable.

went too big with missing link though, which i haven't seen yet.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

breaking even with stop motion is laudable. because like we won awards with our films but i think we earned like 5 grand total. we spent way more than that over the years on tacos for the crew alone.

[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Exactly, making $100 million profit on stop-motion is like feverishly, lovingly crafting a bespoke hot air balloon with a thousand discarded model airplane kits and then realizing you've somehow survived landing on the moon.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

Aardman Animations: excuse me?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

Did he fall far away from that shit family tree, or does he have his dad's politics?

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

I mean at least he's doing something productive with his wealth. That puts him insanely far ahead of most wealth babies.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

In a non-cap society, do stop motion movies still get created by enthusiasts?

I think so.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

As long as you don’t piss off your patron.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 42 points 1 day ago

'Propping up the stop motion film industry' is quite the statement. Aardman Animaton has been releasing feature length stop motion movies since 2000 and all have done very well. Also Laika only worked on Corpse Bride of Tim Burton's multiple very successful stop motion movies.

load more comments
view more: next ›