You better not walk by a neighborhood with Flock though... You might try to mask but see the various 4th amendment activist videos on how well that usually goes.
traingang
Post as many train pictures as possible.
All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.
Home of train gang
:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:
Talk about supply chain issues here!
List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things
Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.
Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.
LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN
"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende
keep going...
Let him cook
One could even cross international borders doing this
International borders, famous for not checking your identification
From Minnesota to Washington is a lot of country...
I mean I'll hand it to him on that one that if you do the non-public transport stuff like roughing it through the wild that's probably really doable
The pedestrian can truly become a "ghost" in a way that is 100% not possible for motorists to imitate.
New tagline


The dialectic of people power against the centralizing forces of control.
The contradictions in libertarianism usually lead people back to liberalism, straight to fascism, or occasionally to left anarchism. It takes some pretty strong mental "fortitude" to maintain the cognitive dissonance required to believe in right libertarianism for very long. Or uniquely privileged material conditions.

He is confused but he has the spirit.
This is an unintended side effect of biking as main mode of transport, along with exercise
My main reason for biking has been financial solvency as a person surviving through wage slavery
And also not having anyone to teach me to drive through the formative high school and college years
He took the canoe pill
. . . and that's why it's essential to remove the State's requirements for driver's licensure, automobile registration, emissions checks, . . . .
Unironically yes. At least the current emission checks are levied against individuals, when it's manufacturers who should be watched. And it's far, far, FAR better for the environment to drive an old car into the ground than to buy a new one with fewer immediate emissions. Not to mention the fact that fuel efficiency isn't even taken into account, so you could burn 2/3 the gas in the first place, but still required to take your vehicle off the road. Current emission regulation sucks ass, and is exactly backwards.
Driver's licenses are also a joke. They are ridiculously easy to get, to the point where it's difficult to imagine anyone deciding to get on the road and risk their lives if they wouldn't be able to pass the tests. And registration is just a way for the cops to find you; not helpful at all.
On this one, the "libertarians" (propertarians) are correct. At least in the status quo implementation of these things.
(We drive on the correct side of the road to avoid dying, not because the state makes us do so. Also, as with so many things, the reason we can't take care of shit ourselves and are "stuck" begging the state to do so is that it violently prohibits community solutions to problems.)
I do like the phrase "Propertarians" for the right-wing Gadsden flag crowd.
I think we could get rid of most of this stuff without significant blowback if we reduce the speed limits.
Yep. And the way to actually reduce those speeds (limits) is to physically shape the roads, not post new numbers on the side of them. Just make it infeasible to drive fast. Reduce lane sizes, create visual and physical barriers that make drivers drive "more defensively" (of their own vehicles and safety), physically divide/protect pedestrians and bicycles, eliminate "strodes", etc.
Where we are going we don't need lanes
is it
i'm ventriloquizing what would be the obvious, marginally more clever, libertarian line of thinking.
Hey, whatever helps people seek out alternatives to driving. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, I suppose.


I wonder if he is John Forester pilled.
This dude is like Forrester for MTBs if anything. Actual Forrester was way too urbanism-headed to think of "bicycle to cross wilderness border" as a use case
I love myself a good weirdo
he does suck, like, a lot. I know the principled libertarian thing gives him a few sympathy points but my god is this guy a pathos laden idiot
The less I learn about him, the better.