this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

traingang

23018 readers
1 users here now

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post "lmao" or use the tired "_____ challenge" format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

"that train pic is too powerful lmao" - u/Cadende

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every 1 in 1,000 libertarians seems to realize bicycles are good even according to their principles and then you get a post like this.

If you don't know Hickman, I think he'd best be described as a sort of primitivist-nostalgic liberterian for settler times in the USA. To fulfill his dreams he moved out into the boonies of upstate new york and ever so often hates how it's full of uncultured swine, by his definition.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KnilAdlez@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The pedestrian can truly become a "ghost" in a way that is 100% not possible for motorists to imitate.

New tagline


[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

sicko-biker luigi-dance

The dialectic of people power against the centralizing forces of control.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

One could even cross international borders doing this

International borders, famous for not checking your identification

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

I mean I'll hand it to him on that one that if you do the non-public transport stuff like roughing it through the wild that's probably really doable

From Minnesota to Washington is a lot of country...

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The contradictions in libertarianism usually lead people back to liberalism, straight to fascism, or occasionally to left anarchism. It takes some pretty strong mental "fortitude" to maintain the cognitive dissonance required to believe in right libertarianism for very long. Or uniquely privileged material conditions.

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago

let-em-cook Let him cook

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today 13 points 3 weeks ago

Hey, whatever helps people seek out alternatives to driving. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth, I suppose.

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago

He is confused but he has the spirit.

[–] BGDelirium@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

This is an unintended side effect of biking as main mode of transport, along with exercise

My main reason for biking has been financial solvency as a person surviving through wage slavery

And also not having anyone to teach me to drive through the formative high school and college years

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

He took the canoe pill

[–] WilliamJenningsBryanJonestownMassacre@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

. . . and that's why it's essential to remove the State's requirements for driver's licensure, automobile registration, emissions checks, . . . .

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i'm ventriloquizing what would be the obvious, marginally more clever, libertarian line of thinking.

[–] ziggurter@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Unironically yes. At least the current emission checks are levied against individuals, when it's manufacturers who should be watched. And it's far, far, FAR better for the environment to drive an old car into the ground than to buy a new one with fewer immediate emissions. Not to mention the fact that fuel efficiency isn't even taken into account, so you could burn 2/3 the gas in the first place, but still required to take your vehicle off the road. Current emission regulation sucks ass, and is exactly backwards.

Driver's licenses are also a joke. They are ridiculously easy to get, to the point where it's difficult to imagine anyone deciding to get on the road and risk their lives if they wouldn't be able to pass the tests. And registration is just a way for the cops to find you; not helpful at all.

On this one, the "libertarians" (propertarians) are correct. At least in the status quo implementation of these things.

(We drive on the correct side of the road to avoid dying, not because the state makes us do so. Also, as with so many things, the reason we can't take care of shit ourselves and are "stuck" begging the state to do so is that it violently prohibits community solutions to problems.)

[–] 00xide@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

I do like the phrase "Propertarians" for the right-wing Gadsden flag crowd.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think we could get rid of most of this stuff without significant blowback if we reduce the speed limits.

[–] ziggurter@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yep. And the way to actually reduce those speeds (limits) is to physically shape the roads, not post new numbers on the side of them. Just make it infeasible to drive fast. Reduce lane sizes, create visual and physical barriers that make drivers drive "more defensively" (of their own vehicles and safety), physically divide/protect pedestrians and bicycles, eliminate "strodes", etc.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Where we are going we don't need lanes

[–] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

what's next, a license to make toast in my own damn toaster?

[–] Fossifoo@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

You better not walk by a neighborhood with Flock though... You might try to mask but see the various 4th amendment activist videos on how well that usually goes.

nicholson-yes keep going...

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder if he is John Forester pilled.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This dude is like Forrester for MTBs if anything. Actual Forrester was way too urbanism-headed to think of "bicycle to cross wilderness border" as a use case

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I love myself a good weirdo

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

he does suck, like, a lot. I know the principled libertarian thing gives him a few sympathy points but my god is this guy a pathos laden idiot

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

The less I learn about him, the better.