this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
390 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

84857 readers
3994 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

WTF kind of psychopath swats an 81 year old woman?

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 7 points 17 hours ago

What kind of psychopath rolls up to a random house with 20 cars juat because some probably child called? Special weapons and tactics my ass. They just burn taxpayer money and amerkkkans are okay with it

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 2 points 19 hours ago

The same kind that swats other streamers.

[–] musket528@sopuli.xyz 7 points 20 hours ago

imagine swat pulling to a house only to see a grandma playing minecraft. it's cursed

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 211 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Great comment attached to the story in the comments section ...

"America - the country where they can afford to send 25 police cars to your house for no good reason, but have no money to pay for cancer treatment. Amazing."

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

America, where grandmas are more dangerous than Christian pedophiles.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

America, where you can be imprisoned indefinitely for stealing a few hundred dollars worth of product .... but get elected as President if you can steal billions.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No money to fund the "fraud, waste, and abuse" at USAID but easy $1.4B to tear down a government building and build a monument to the most arrogant man on Earth.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

More than monument!

Trumpstein Ballroom

The Tacky Arch

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

L'arc de dumbass

[–] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Its all about money. Its all the people in charge here care about. I'm serious.

The cops have a chance to "civil asset forfeiture" your stuff. So they come in and kill you or whatever but oh, looks like you were commiting a crime citizen (whether you were or not dead men tell no tales) so now all of the stuff you own is proceeds from that crime and they keep it all and auction it off on websites or sometimes you will dee the local police department driving around a nice vehicle they stole from someone like that.

That cancer treatment shit costs money, they will think to themselves, and it keeps alive people who are in bad health and that will cost us even more money.

So they don't care that they die. I bet if you took away polices ability to civil asset forfeiture then the murder squads would ease up a little too. No incentive.

Its all about the money, at its core.

[–] almost1337@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

Even if they don't kill you, good luck proving the negative that you weren't committing a crime. Plus the charges/case get filed against the assets, not against the owner.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 100 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The most famous case came in 2018, when 25-year-old Tyler Barriss tried to swat a streamer, but instead sent the police to the wrong address. It ended with a father-of-two being shot dead by officers. Barriss was sentenced to 20 years in prison.

And the police who murdered the innocent father? How many years did they get?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 74 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is fundamentally the real problem. Submitting false reports to police will always be possible. Anyone can do it. But a false police report should never endanger someone's life. That's only possible because of bad policing.

I've actually personally made a police report that resulted in our version of a SWAT team being sent. They're called ETF here in Canada. I saw what looked like a domestic violence incident, with a knife involved. Because there was a weapon, policy said to send ETF.

When they arrived they locked down the entire area, and then they talked to the people inside the apartment. They gave clear and simple instructions, they made them both walk out one at a time, they got everyone's stories, and they resolved the entire incident without violence.

ETF are trained by JTF-2, one of the best special forces units in the world. These are absolutely terrifying people. If violence had been needed they would have dispensed it with ruthless efficiency. But that training also gives them the confidence to not use violence as a first resort. They're taught to de-escalate, to resolve situations safely and calmly wherever possible.

This is how policing works all over the developed world. Only in America is "murder by cop" a realistic option, and that's 100% a problem with American policing.

And, I want to be absolutely clear about this; Canadian policing sucks. We're not even a good example. So many countries do it better than us. America has set the bar so low that even our middling efforts look amazing in comparison.

[–] sudo@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

This is how policing works all over the developed world. Only in America is "murder by cop" a realistic option, and that's 100% a problem with American policing.

This is emphatically false. There are several other horrilble places where cops will murder civilians as well, without thinking twice about it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_with_annual_rates_and_counts_for_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers

Also, if you look at those statistics Canada is actually pretty high up there with cops murdering people as well.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So many countries do it better than us. America has set the bar so low that even our middling efforts look amazing in comparison.

This is true for so many things

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it's kind of interesting being depressingly low in absolute terms, and then looking over at the absolute garbage fire of our nearest neighbour and being like, "well, it could be worse..."

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

AMERICA FUCK YEAH

[–] tapdattl@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Best we can do is paid leave

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago

Mandatory paid vacation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's not the police fault, they have to take every threat serious

sure...

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

I don't think there's necessarily anything inherently wrong with that statement. A police force acting in the interests of the citizenry to protect and serve them should take any threat seriously. Where things fall apart though is trying to claim that sending multiple vehicles full of heavily armed SWAT agents to someone's house based on a single prank call is the same as "taking the threat serious".

[–] fira@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

Fuck the police

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 88 points 1 day ago (2 children)

On multiple levels, most US American thing I read today...

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

We did it, Reddit!

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i don't think i even need to post the image.

so-far.gif

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

so-far.gif

Nah, I don't think so.
At least not today.

The posted content is pretty high up on the US-cliché-meter, and I also have blocked the communities that poisoned my "all" view too much with US domestic squabbles.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

“You can’t get that much attention if you want it. I was eating it up. It was kinda fun.”

😂

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"It was kinda fun. I met people I would never have met otherwise."

Amazing

[–] luxadazy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

highly recommend her channel, she always makes me laugh (though i do worry she’s being taken advantage of by her other grandson)

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

thankfully this time the pigs didn't burst in with guns blazing

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Best case scenario the publicity ends up with grandson's cancer treatment fully paid for by anon donors.

EDIT:

best-case scenario, the best possible outcome of an event.

The phrase is typically used to denote something that could happen given a situation. It's 2026 in America, universal healthcare isn't on the menu.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Best case for a cancer patient would be a proper health care system, where your cancer treatment is covered by the universal health coverage.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

She's not likely going to be around long enough to see that happen.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, I'm sure that's a likely scenario to happen.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago

OK fine best case scenario Jesus comes back tomorrow and everybody's problems are over

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago

And so a new conspiracy theory is born

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

This is the world we live in now.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

At least she took it with a sense of humour.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would be interesting to learn what fraction of SWAT (and SWAT-like) responses are to legitimate emergencies where their presence is both warranted and helpful.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 8 points 1 day ago

It has to extrmely low due to their use in the war on drugs raiding homes where there is zero credible threats of violence.

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's 2026, there's no longer an excuse for phone companies being unable to figure out who's paying for the phone line. Make them liable if they can't figure out where the call came from.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I mean it's also 2026... you can drive 3 cities away, buy a burner phone with cash. Make a call, smash the phone with a rock and throw it in a dumpster. Then it's down to scary facial recognition tech assuming the store you bought it from has security cameras.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›