this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
150 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7005 readers
1216 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The future is about embedded ads in LLM responses, and people relying more and more on LLMs, so what we need to do is what we've always done - circumvent / block ads. But how would that work in this scenario, realistically?

[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

By not using AI in any of it's forms willingly, for one. Another would be- if AI suggests a product or a brand, no matter what prompt, it's safe to bet that it's an ad.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

"If we have to destroy the world to sell branded shit then let it be so!" - The Advertising Council of America (another billionaire shell/shill company).

ticket closed - by design

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 0 points 13 hours ago

Could it be because browsers force sponsored content to the top of search results? No, no, it's the data analysis who are wrong.

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Duh, that was always the plan. It was never for the good of humanity, just good for the oligarchs wallets

[–] illi@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago

From the moment I herd that Google was going to transition to LLMs my first thought was that it was their way of finally defeating adblockers.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 22 hours ago

Ain't no way!

[–] Bashnagdul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

In other news, water is wet.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

just like most popular search engines, didn't expect other than following same path

[–] PoliteDudeInTheMood@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My wife got a new corporate laptop, so I was interested in docking stations for it. Since I was on the couch and not on my desktop I asked ChatGPT what its recommendations were and all the results were stupid expensive crap. I had to point out that it was overpriced garbage, and then it showed me affordable ones on Amazon.

If I specify what I'm looking for it will generally provide me with what I want. But if I'm not specific it will happily show me the most expensive and worst options first.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Stop asking it anything at all in the first place.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Ya don't say

[–] slowbyrne@lemmy.zip 0 points 20 hours ago

As much as I want to jump to conclusions, I can't help but think that this might be a correlation versus causation situation. It's possible that search engine results and their rankings were given different weights in a model. Ads would more often show up first in a search result.

Wait , who owns (sells ads for) Qwen?