this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
289 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

11807 readers
1619 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He's just saying that so he can get his hand on fesh teen sperm to study it. Soon trump will announce he personally wants to investigate the decline of pubic hairs amongst young girls. So give them a break guys, these are hard times for the conservatives who are just trying to do their jobs.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

get his hand on fesh teen sperm to study it

We all know he's going to cook it and eat it.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

How else is he supposed to study it exactly?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

on camera? again?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

No shit we have microplastics in our bodies including our balls. So no surprise if effects sperm count.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

not my balls!

[–] zurchpet@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 hours ago

Hah, and this administration is the one that is going to fix that. LOL. Yeah, right.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Do people in their 70s somehow have less plastic in their balls?

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 13 points 13 hours ago

We've added a lot of plastics to our life in the last decades. And much took its time to break down (into pieces, not molecules).

Oh, and they mean men in the 1970s, not 70 year old men.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

90% of all plastic ever produced as of ten years ago, had been produced in the preceding ten years, and massive new production has come online since then.

The problem is a lot bigger than just microplastic I'm afraid, and bigger than male fertility.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Part of what I dislike about this is how this is a totally reasonable question to ask as a scientific study if one is actually concerned, but no the secretary of health and human services would rather talk out his ass

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

There are studies about it.

They are full of problems, because it's something hard to measure. But idiots have been repeating that like for ages like if it was undoubtedly true.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

He didn't word it right and hes probably got ulterior motives, but the male infertility crisis is a real thing.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago (3 children)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

does that account for Sperms Georg?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

There is some controversy but more studies point towards infertility than steady rates. The very study you linked could have discluded people who have already been impacted by fertility issues

This study does not address whether infertility is on the rise. “We didn't track men who were fertile who became infertile."

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

That's bullshit and medical establishments are full of fucking shit.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

a Worldwide problem, sperm counts are down. I think it's clear it's connected to the worldwide crash in insect populations, 90% since the 1990s, and amphibians. Chemical pollution no doubt, endocrine disruptors and whatever else.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago

Ya know,

I wouldn't be surprised to find out that he genuinely knows through taste-testing while on drug-fuelled benders

'Murica, you're fucked

  • Sincerely,

    The civilised world

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

On the plus side out balls are crammed full of micro plastics........wait

[–] prex@aussie.zone 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Who is that on the left?

Oh. Oh no.

On behalf of the whole world:

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Has been uh... generating samples?

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 6 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

The quality of sperm and the volume declines with age.

This is well known, and would have taken him two seconds to find a study on nih.gov about this. Not that it matters, since he's operating by "feel" instead of fact.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Is he saying old men? I read it as teens today have less than men in the 1970's.

[–] human@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

“In 1970, men had twice the sperm count as our teenagers do today,” Kennedy said Monday. “This is an existential crisis for our country.”

https://people.com/rfk-jr-says-men-in-the-70s-had-twice-as-much-sperm-as-teenage-boys-today-existential-crisis-11972098

"men in the '70s" = men in the 1970s, not "men in their 70s"

Just clarifying. I think he's an idiot.

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 2 points 14 hours ago

My bad, I shouldn't have commented before fully waking up :)

[–] Signtist@bookwyr.me 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not to give him too much credit, but it sounds like that's what he's trying to say. Men in the 70's, who reasonably should have lower production than teenagers, have more when compared to the teens of today.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It seems to be that he is talking about it in the worst way possible, considering his reputation I'm not surprised. It just a situation which undermines the factual evidence.