TIL. Thanks for the reply.
zurchpet
Probably an intenet myth. But I have somewhere in my memory, that the machines are hard to clean. So enployees mark them out of order to not have to clean them.
Urban Legend. Probably.
Why would it need permission?
Yes.
I have only one of their services that I do not see replaced any time soon. YouTube. What they do there is impressive, and very, very hard to replicate.
Not a fan of YouTube, don't get me wrong. But I see nothing comparable out there (maybe AWS, but they just run some infrastructure orchestration).
Google will kill YouTube long before anybody else is able to pull off the same stunt.
Or is there a service comparable for video streaming?
You know what usually makes an economy boom?
Have the people have expendable income.
Raise wages for all and see your exonomy explode!
So far this is only research.
Now they have to figure out to make it scale for production.
Still some months or rather years before we see this in consumer devices.
And no. This won't change humanity and capitalist greed.
But. This should apply to ANY person. I'm no judge and I too don't want to my home address found easily.
I get why the judge gets the protection. But I don't get why not everybody gets that protection too.
Data brokers as a whole should be forbidden.
I am totally on the bottom right group.
Probably all of it
I thought it was the moon.