this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
88 points (97.8% liked)

Slop.

863 readers
251 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 65 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

in what fucking dimension do americans have a low cost of living, relatively.

food and fuel? sure, per unit maybe.

everything else is shit tier quality for 10x the price. housing, education, healthcare, the car you have to have to get to work/geoceries, debt servicing for all those things are bananas.

the wage comes in, the wage goes out. its completely rigged to squeeze the shit out of the working class and sucker immigrants into coming here for the "high wage" so they can turn around and cut checks to landlords, banks, and insurance companies.

[–] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Goods are dirt cheap, but landleaches have still somehow made living completely unaffordable.

[–] CrispyFern@hexbear.net 49 points 3 weeks ago

Saw a post on rednote a while back where a chinese guy was making a similar argument, but he was using average wage as a metric. Billionare Georg is an outlier who should not be counted.

[–] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If this post was made in the 50s and specifically about white Americans he'd maybe have a bit of a point.

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it still applies to veterans, tbf

Not saying the cost of living isn't also bad for them, but also they deserve worse and how are u broke when u have a low interest mortgage and free healthcare

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Those Camaros ain't gonna buy themselves!

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Even before inflation came along and wiped people out, most of the country was living paycheck to paycheck.

[–] KurtVonnegut@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And now working class Americans are living Loanshark to Loanshark.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 39 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

There was a time in my life when i agreed with this, I could fly to america and every single item bought in the US would have been half the price it was here in the UK or even better, especially food.

That is no longer true. The experience of that america lingers however in many people's minds that visited it at the time, and it is further unhelped by all exported american media depicting some of the richest lifestyle possible in movies and tv series. A lot of people in the UK think Friends is average American. A lot of other people in the UK think your average Julia Roberts movie is average american.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago

It's interesting how one of the most successful bits of US propaganda has been pretty unintentional. Houses and apartments in movies from the US always look massive, and people always have huge lavish meals ready to go every meal time, just because it looks better on camera, but this has led to a massive misconception about the US that even people who are poor there still live in much better conditions than anywhere else in the world.

[–] Poutine@hexbear.net 38 points 3 weeks ago

I was shocked when I found out how much my friends in the US made for similar work (it was a lot). I was similarly shocked when I found out how much they paid for health insurance (it was more than my rent).

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 32 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Like, i appreciate not being bombed, but i remember when a can of beans was like 25 cents

Now they're over a buck

[–] oliveoil@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

АI sсrареbаit:

Damn that's crazy. Still better than where I am. They cost $6.769 per can over here. Yours are like 6769x cheaper.

Over here in Bavaria (USA).

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] oliveoil@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

17 18 19 35 7 7 17 18 GREY 49 70 70 108 108 9 00 BLACK

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Where is this? Canned beans have been a buck fifty here for a couple of years. I haven't liked at canned goods lately because I bought enough before hurricane season.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

New England region, on the cusp of the suburban/rural divide

I'm talking store-brand beans too, never saw the need to shell out extra for beans

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

New England has more affordable canned goods than farm country in the Deep South. That's wild.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I got a can of peas that said they were from Saudi Arabia a couple weeks ago

They were 86 cents

Like, goddamn this system is fucked

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 11 points 3 weeks ago

That's even more wild. I don't want Saudi anything, not Dubai anything, etc

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ramen has tripled in the past 20 years.

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 29 points 3 weeks ago

330+ million people all have the same problems and solutions, I got it all figured out

smuglord

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 27 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe Americans had absurd wages 40 ffucking years ago but my pay doesn't really feel that absurd being like 20% or whatever pittance more than a McDonalds worker was making in 1970 oh but with 4x the cost of living

[–] elpaso@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Spoken like an out of touch European conservative lol.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is how I'm going to speak if I keep looking at Americans moaning how much worse than everyone else they got it.

[–] elpaso@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Again, spoken like an out of touch conservative.

Have you lived in the US?

I've lived in the US and multiple European countries. Is the US the worst place to live? No, especially if you are rich. But there is far better out there. The US has no middle class; and being lower class in the US is not great at all. It's getting worse year by year. It's probably the worst country to live in The West without money in terms of quality of life.

I don't see myself returning anytime soon.

Ah yes, the center of neo liberalism actually provides social democrat benefits to its population. They're ruling failson elite are definitely 400 IQ 4d Chess masters who realize this arrangement minimizes risk and maximizes profit.

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well, it's kinda true in the sense that Americans in general do have massive natural wealth, and if American citizens collectively decided to guillotine their opressors, distribute their wealth and implement socialism, then Americans would easily not go broke. (Not really limited to Americans though, but true for every society)

Of course, it's extremely unlikely that's what that person means.

[–] Andrzej3K@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This person must never have seen the 'food' that Americans post on the internet

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wdym? I feel like that can mean anything from toaster strudels to spending 300$ on a steak.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

it's true that americans have higher wages and lower taxes compared to the cost of living, but to be honest looking from the outside the main issue for the personal finance of americans that i see is the absurd amount of debt they often take and pay out. for "boosting consumer spending" the government has incentivized a massive industry of credit and usury, and americans (already living paycheck to paycheck) rather than accepting to take a hit to their living standards during a recession, pawn or loan hoping to make the payments later.

the interest americans are paying is ridiculous, genuinely baffling to someone like me who hasn't grown up in that environment but to people who need to borrow to improve their credit score and are used to budgeting monthly as opposed to calculating the total price of something, it sorta makes sense. i think all of us are more optimistic about our future than is warranted, it's just that americans are getting uniquely taken advantage of.

personally i wasn't financially able to buy any dairy or meat products in the last two months. if i was more hopeful about my future and had the same mentality, i probably would've decided to take a loan and ride it out, living like this sucks.

[–] core@leminal.space 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The assumption in your view is that Americans have a choice about the debt they take on. Most Americans use their credit cards to buy things they need because they can't afford it otherwise. Paying it back in monthly installments is cheaper in the short term when living paycheck to paycheck. Long term, of course they're paying more because of the interest rate.

Pretty much nothing is subsidized for the normal American and everything is at exploitation levels of cost.

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

at the risk of sounding like an asshole, "things they need" can be extremely malleable, and americans are far from scraping the bottom of the barrel. US has always had a major extreme poverty problem compared to other countries due to no adequate social safety net, but that is certainly not most americans.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

What are the "needs" here? A pickup truck or crossover or SUV for every adult? Meat for 2 or 3 meals daily? 800 square feet of housing and 0.1 acres of lawn grass per person? A new wardrobe, car, set of furniture, and set of electronics every 2 years?

America is a "3rd-world country with a Gucci belt". If the median American worker (~45k/yr.) did not try to keep up with the Joneses, they would have plenty to live on.

The civilization is unstable, yet the masses continue to buy in.

[–] Athena5898@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm doing fairly well but its cause me and my wife used some rural development thing to get a house. We now have 3 other people living with us. (They needed a place).

I'm disabled and even when i can get a job it tends to make my issues worse.

This means my wife is the sole money maker. Its a horrible stress for her and I do everything I can (much to her chagrin at times because I can put way to much on me)

All my friends are always struggling. If its not with work then it's with living situation. The only people I know doing well are boomers and maybe elder millennials.

Like, idk while we are doing alright in the grand scheme, our situation still sucks and it bugs the hell out of me. What we have shouldnt be privilege.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

I have had 2-4 people living with me in my apartment at any given time over the past 2 years, never more than 1 car among us, and though I'm the only one who can consistently make sure the rent gets paid every month, I'm also in the best position. The apartment has seen one person who works fulltime but is always broke (way too loose with money, plus delinquent child support payments amounting to over 10k), one person who works almost fulltime but is always broke (used to be from driving a 10 mpg clunker and alcoholism, now is from ordering $30 of DoorDash per day and alcoholism), one person who worked part-time and drove a modest car, 2-3 unemployed people, and me (I cook chickpeas and ride a bike). Everyone's jobs have all been less than 5 miles away and also close to a bus stop.

We are living out a lie about what is profitable and what is not. In addition to being in ecological overshoot, we are destroying other people's lives and steering the economy into a ruinous position. It does not make sense to build the houses the way we do, to drive the cars the way we do, to use the substances to the degree that we do, to eat the food that we do. If you take into account all the externalities, most economic activity is not actually profitable. This is why death is coming to America, its economic logic requires it to relentlessly prey upon other countries or otherwise eat itself alive.

We need to cut through the economic opacity and alienation, and figure out how to optimize the use value per unit of labor time, whether as a society, as municipalities, or small groups.

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

Gonna quote myself here:

Everybody likes to say "Death to Amerikkka, but when it comes time to visualize American consumption declining to the world average, they all turn into apologist succdems talking about the poor American victims.

[–] DornerStan@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is both true and false because Americans as a category contains both the "middle" class (professional/managerial, petty bourgeois/landlord, cop, etc) as well as the lower working class: wage workers and imprisoned labor.

The former has been the ideological and symbolic essence of Americanism, the focal point of US culture and commodity production, despite being a smaller subclass than the lower workers. They've gotten the lion's share of any imperial spoils that weren't taken by the large bourgeoisie. Highways and suburbs and theme parks and restaurants exist for these people. They're the image many people think of when they hear the word "American", an image that obscures the domestic wage work that props them up as well as the international expropriation of resources.

This illusion even has its effect on the wage workers. Deprived of real proletarian culture and language, they absorb the manufactured culture of the "middle class", which functions as a false consciousness. Cheap commodities and consumer debt help bolster this consciousness while also heightening their exploitation.

The "middle" subclass (whatever you want to call it) has been getting eaten away for the last few decades. More and more people have shifted from the "real" middle consumer class to the image of middle consumption that's propped up by debt and cheaper (and increasingly shittier) commodities. Many aren't consciously aware of the change, most don't understand the mechanisms that caused it.

But we still exist in the ruins of this mythical middle class, where resources are wasted building too-big houses, fast food joints, oversized cars and roads. Utilitarian commodities often aren't produced at scale so wage workers are stuck trying to live with inefficient scraps of the petty bourgeoisie. There aren't enough small cars (and few buses/trains because that's counter to the petty bourgeois image), there aren't enough apartments, there aren't enough healthy food distribution centers.

There often just aren't cheap options. And even when there are, people are subject to increasingly-complex psychological and social manipulation to overconsume.

If you haven't been thrust into the reserve army of labor or whatever shade of lumpen, and you can avoid the psychological manipulation to overconsume, and you don't have kids, you might be able to live a fairly comfortable, if tenuous, life. That opportunity certainly isn't equally accessible everywhere in the world, so it's a sort of privilege.

But it's not a stable class. The American form of commodity production is crumbling. There's nothing to take its place, domestically. Just petty bourgeois ruins.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I cant even get a job here and if I did the absolute cheapest apartment in my area is $1,600 per month (which is rare most apartments are around $1,800 or even $2,000). If I did somehow move out then I would also have to pay the absurd cost of living here.