this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
106 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

84597 readers
3950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are these the same researchers baffled by fucking magnets?

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

How do they work‽

[–] Acemod@lemmy.world 178 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I hate when they se terms like "cannot be explained" in the headline, and then proceed to explain it in the article.

How lazy are journalists and editors these days?

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 94 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm right there with you when that kind of clickbaiting crops up, but this article actually isn't doing that; they're directly quoting the researchers:

[Manganese]-based passivation is a counter-intuitive discovery, which cannot be explained by current knowledge in corrosion science.

This seems like a genuinely novel discovery.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How dare you attempt to temper my outrage!

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tempering the metal might ruin the protective properties!

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck you for making me giggle. Take this upvote and shove it!

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

DID SOMEBODY SAY OUTRAGE?!

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago

Number 4 will shock you!

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 12 points 2 days ago

If something in a headline is in quotes, it should be a direct quote. In this case, they are following that standard. It's a direct quote of Dr. Kaiping Yu who worked on the research.

It also happens to make for a very catchy headline.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Except the article says the same thing that the title does. They explain that it does work but that they don't know why because by all expectations it shouldn't.

A material that should make the alloy less resistant to corrosion actually makes it more so, and they can't explain why.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It's all clickbait, people see a headline like that and read the article because it sounds like someone is making magic metal.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago

The title makes it sound like it just walked around the corner and declared itself.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Damn, they're scrapping UFOs now for their high purity steel (/s)

Can't be a UFO, they identified it, even the materials it's made of, so now it us an IFO

[–] morto@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

was this research leaked from xcom?

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Particle beams when? I need to upgrade my arsenal. The way things are going in the US there's liable to be a civil war part 2 soon, sadly.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Unexplained Ferrous Objects

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 23 points 2 days ago

This was discovered 6 years ago, and tons of the steel has been produced since then. This is much further along than I expected

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can definitely tell who read the article based on how people are commenting.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Headlines like that discourage a lot of users from clicking. Seems like clickbait

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I'm pretty selective of which click bait articles I click on.