Ignore the court order. It's much too close to an election to change the maps last minute, and the work was already done. We'll revisit this for the next election.
I mean, the GOP has done this in multiple states. Fucking do it as well.
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Ignore the court order. It's much too close to an election to change the maps last minute, and the work was already done. We'll revisit this for the next election.
I mean, the GOP has done this in multiple states. Fucking do it as well.
They're actually throwing out votes in Louisiana, but sure, because some people had cast early votes that they could change, the votes they cast in a well-publicized effort later didn't count.
Lol I see you've not met the controlled opposition
I dont think Democrats have an uphill challenge to a majority. It might be slimmer, but I dont think Republicans have fully grasped yet the depth of discontent and anger by everyone but their most dedicated supporters
Redistricting would have consolidated Dems to get seats...
But the map passed on a vote, the people wanted it.
Judges going against the people is likely to see more Dem turnout and possibly even more gain in seats. While drawing attention to any judges up for election.
Every Dem state party has been operating at campaign levels for a year since the DNC started making it rain. They'll keep it up at least thru the midterms and likely thru the presidential.
A steady steam of ~1 million every month to every state (and territory) party with extra money going to red and purple states where we can get the most gains.
The Indiana primaries gave us a really good insight, as much as trump wouldn't shut up about it, the races all had very low turnout and close to 50/50.
Even rural Republicans are tired of trump, they won't vote D, but they may just stop voting for a couple cycles.
We're being forced to take the risky gamble, but it could very well pay off.
and thinking that way, inaction will continue and Pikachu surprised faces will reign come November as the Republicans hold on to power...
... then you can tell the world again there is nothing Americans can do to stop Americans from destroying the world
Thrown out on a technicality... Meanwhile Florida is about to gerrymander mid-decade in spite of their state constitution explicitly forbidding the legislature to draw districts.
So only the fascist filth are allowed to gerrymander.
Someone remind me, what comes after the ballot box is no longer valid in a destroyed democracy?
If the federal court wasn't supremely corrupt it would have disallowed all of this last minute gerrymandering that Trump started. Now Roberts wants us to believe they arent't deciding based on their politics. Yea, right. Super corrupt
Can we please, please, please stop using the NYT as a source?
I mean, they have biases in certain areas, but they're one of the few news sources that does any actually reporting anymore vs regurgitation. What sources would you prefer?
I don't agree that they don't do regurgitation. They do some reporting also, but its always from a very narrow, specific neo-liberal framing.
And for this particular article, there are at least 100 other sources you could use? Any of them? Maybe one local to Virginia or one that broke the news?
The issue is the reflexive turn to legacy news sources like NYT or WAPO that have a specific framing which objectively supports the capitalist class; the treating of these sources as "the real news" and everything else like local news, international news, or smaller sites like DropSite, as not legitimate.
We really need to purge billionaire owned heavily corporate media from our diet.
Huge blow to democracies, that is.
They did it. Elections are effectively cancelled for black Americans.
Kill 'em all