this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
86 points (95.7% liked)

politics

29849 readers
2041 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The decision is a major victory for Republicans, wiping away a measure approved by voters to allow Democrats to gain as many as four House seats in the midterms.

The Republicans are about to gerrymander all the black representatives out of the South, so it's going to be a very uphill effort for Democrats to win a majority int he House, even if 60% of Americans vote for Democrats.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 39 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ignore the court order. It's much too close to an election to change the maps last minute, and the work was already done. We'll revisit this for the next election.

I mean, the GOP has done this in multiple states. Fucking do it as well.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 weeks ago

They're actually throwing out votes in Louisiana, but sure, because some people had cast early votes that they could change, the votes they cast in a well-publicized effort later didn't count.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

Lol I see you've not met the controlled opposition

[–] Crystalbound@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I dont think Democrats have an uphill challenge to a majority. It might be slimmer, but I dont think Republicans have fully grasped yet the depth of discontent and anger by everyone but their most dedicated supporters

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Redistricting would have consolidated Dems to get seats...

But the map passed on a vote, the people wanted it.

Judges going against the people is likely to see more Dem turnout and possibly even more gain in seats. While drawing attention to any judges up for election.

Every Dem state party has been operating at campaign levels for a year since the DNC started making it rain. They'll keep it up at least thru the midterms and likely thru the presidential.

A steady steam of ~1 million every month to every state (and territory) party with extra money going to red and purple states where we can get the most gains.

The Indiana primaries gave us a really good insight, as much as trump wouldn't shut up about it, the races all had very low turnout and close to 50/50.

Even rural Republicans are tired of trump, they won't vote D, but they may just stop voting for a couple cycles.

We're being forced to take the risky gamble, but it could very well pay off.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

and thinking that way, inaction will continue and Pikachu surprised faces will reign come November as the Republicans hold on to power...

... then you can tell the world again there is nothing Americans can do to stop Americans from destroying the world

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Thrown out on a technicality... Meanwhile Florida is about to gerrymander mid-decade in spite of their state constitution explicitly forbidding the legislature to draw districts.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

So only the fascist filth are allowed to gerrymander.

Someone remind me, what comes after the ballot box is no longer valid in a destroyed democracy?

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

If the federal court wasn't supremely corrupt it would have disallowed all of this last minute gerrymandering that Trump started. Now Roberts wants us to believe they arent't deciding based on their politics. Yea, right. Super corrupt

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can we please, please, please stop using the NYT as a source?

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, they have biases in certain areas, but they're one of the few news sources that does any actually reporting anymore vs regurgitation. What sources would you prefer?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't agree that they don't do regurgitation. They do some reporting also, but its always from a very narrow, specific neo-liberal framing.

And for this particular article, there are at least 100 other sources you could use? Any of them? Maybe one local to Virginia or one that broke the news?

The issue is the reflexive turn to legacy news sources like NYT or WAPO that have a specific framing which objectively supports the capitalist class; the treating of these sources as "the real news" and everything else like local news, international news, or smaller sites like DropSite, as not legitimate.

We really need to purge billionaire owned heavily corporate media from our diet.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

Huge blow to democracies, that is.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

They did it. Elections are effectively cancelled for black Americans.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

Kill 'em all