this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
26 points (96.4% liked)

Cast Iron

2656 readers
12 users here now

A community for cast iron cookware. Recipes, care, restoration, identification, etc.

Rules: Be helpful when you can, be respectful always, and keep cooking bacon.

More rules may come as the community grows, but for now, I'll remove spam or anything obviously mean-spirited, and leave it at that.

Related Communities: !forgediron@lemmy.world !sourdough@lemmy.world !cooking@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’m guessing the finish chipped from the store cleaning the pan aggressively, but poorly, given the recent sticker date. Is that unusual? Gonna refinish it myself this week, as long as this isn’t setting off anyone’s alarm bells.

Edit: gonna head to the hardware store for a lead test kit and magnets this weekend, unless someone can think of a better process. Thanks for the advice, all!

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good idea to do a lead test on it in case someone used it for bullet casting.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For precisely that worry, I’ve read a fair bit and at-home tests seem pretty unreliable. Most tests, reportedly, can offer a false positive from contact with iron. Including those marked for general, non-paint use.

So far, I’ve only managed to learn that (maybe) my local recycling center might possibly have the gear to test this, but otherwise that’s as far as I’ve come. If you know where to test for lead, I’d appreciate the scoop!

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

1: Break off some of the little shiny specks.

2: See if those specks will stick to a strong magnet. (If not, that's a bad sign.)

3: Do one of those at-home test kits on only the specks.

If it didn't stick to the magnet and the test kit says positive for lead, then you know you're not getting a false positive on iron -- if it was iron or anything ferrous, it would have stuck to the magnet. That doesn't absolutely guarantee the accuracy of the test kit, but it would eliminate one common false positive.

If you can separate a sufficiently large speck, you could also do a hardness test on it: what materials is it able to scratch, and what materials rub material off of it? Lead is very much on the softer side, so if the specks are easily deformed and abraded -- especially when tested against things like aluminum -- that's another bad sign that it might be lead.

And, at any rate, I'd be leery of it if the specks don't stick to a magnet. The list of non-magnetic, silver-colored metals you want in contact with your food is pretty short, while the list of ones you don't want in your food is pretty long. Lead is probably the most likely and the worst offender on the list, but there are other possibilities that people might have been messing around with ... and most of those other possibilities aren't great to have in your food, either.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Streak, cleavage, hardness, magnetism, albedo. You just gave me a flashback to 4th grade playing this computer game in class where one had to guess the element based on the above criteria. Very hard for 9yr old me.

[–] Donebrach@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just run that thing through the oven on self clean mode and then do the standard reseasoning process a million YouTube videos show you how to do.

It’s just a piece of metal that gets hot real slow and unevenly and stays hot long.

It’s not the “hack” to real cooking, “good” cooking or “healthy” cooking. Cast iron is just a really hearty piece of cooking utensil that can be beat to shit and still be great to cook on. It does not need to be babied. Treat it like an outdoor grill.

For really easy everyday stuff, get a cheap, uncoated stainless steel pan. It’s the same maintenance as cast iron, just doesn’t weigh as much and doesn’t retain as much heat once it’s off the burner (and you can’t put them in the oven if you have a handle that has some kind of heat resistant filler).

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

I just like a pan I can beat up remorselessly, and which aids my anemia when I do. I’ve reseasoned another pan already, but I’ve never thrifted before so confirming that no one has been melting soda cans, or something, into this thing felt like a reasonable question.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 23 hours ago

Cast iron is the most versatile, and it is really cheap. If you are dirt poor it is the best. I use mine all the time, but I fully agree, it is just a cooking pan, not a religion, nobody is going to hell for not using cast iron.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You can’t really hurt cast iron except by shattering it. Remove the finish and replace it then move on with life

[–] f1error@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

"Lead Check" by Luxfer doesn't give as many false positives as other brands. Buy a set of testers, use one on a cast iron cooking tool you know is lead-free. Use the same tool immediately on your thrifted piece.

If your thrifted piece does test positive for lead, please, please destroy it.

If it's lead-free, yellow cap strip it, give it a brief/gentle sanding. and reseason.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Certainly worth testing for lead, but know that most tests you can probably get your hands on are prone to false-positives

And realistically, the risk is pretty minimal. Yes, cast iron is a good choice for melting lead because it can stand up to the heat, but think about it for a second, would a big skillet be a good choice for that? If you're going to be pouring directly from the skillet that's a pretty awkward operation, lead is heavy, the skillet is heavy, and those pour spouts are kind of hit-or-miss when you're pouring something less dangerous than molten metal, and if you're going to be ladling the lead out it's a bit shallow for that operation.

And unless you're melting a lot of lead at one go, that big heavy pan has a lot of mass to heat up before you get to melting temp, it's gonna take you a long time.

It certainly wouldn't be my first choice for a lead-melting vessel is what I'm getting at. Not that no one has used them for that purpose, I'm absolutely sure plenty of people have, but I'd probably be looking for something a little smaller and/or deeper for that purpose if I had any choice in the matter.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

It certainly wouldn’t be my first choice for a lead-melting vessel is what I’m getting at. Not that no one has used them for that purpose, I’m absolutely sure plenty of people have, but I’d probably be looking for something a little smaller and/or deeper for that purpose if I had any choice in the matter.

Yeah ... but sometimes people just use what they've got.

This certainly isn't an ideal container ... but it's also not entirely terrible, either. It can handle the heat without baking off impurities, and it does at least have those side pour spouts, which makes it better than a lot of containers that don't have spouts at all.

I wouldn't rule it out just because this pan isn't the ideal lead-melting container.

[–] toynbee@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They could just eat some bullets to remove any doubt. Then at least they'd know.

edit: I just remembered that "eat some bullets" is oft used as a metaphor for something I very much did not mean to reference. I was trying to be funny, not sad, and certainly don't mean to encourage anything. That's totally on me.

If the original implication refers to something you're considering, there are resources. The world is better with you in it.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Out of curiosity are they prone to false negatives do you know?

[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I have a data point of size ~5, when a friend purchased a bona fide lump of lead in order to be the control for his lead test strips. And he basically used the test strips in pairs: one on the object in question (eg cast iron pan, ham radio, etc) and then the other against that lump of lead. There have not been any false-negatives from the lump.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately that's a bit outside of my area of expertise, I never really see false negatives being discussed when this comes up, I'm sure they happen, not many tests are 100% foolproof either way.

Most lead tests are really designed for paint, so using them on a pan is kind of outside of what they're made for to begin with and I'd be a little skeptical of the results either way.

My understanding, and it may be wrong, my knowledge on the tests comes mostly from places like this where people are cast iron geeks more than chemists, are that the tests are almost more of a test for the presence of metal in general not so much specifically lead, so you get a lot more false positives because of course there's more metal in a metal pan than you'd expect there to be in any kind of paint, and it's better to err on the side of caution and give a false positive instead of a false negative.

Again, that's secondhand knowledge from people who I don't have a ton of confidence in having their facts straight to begin with, so take that with a huge grain of salt.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago