this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
81 points (98.8% liked)

News

37619 readers
1531 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A United Airlines flight reported a midair collision between the plane and what appeared to be a drone near San Diego, according to a Wednesday statement. “United flight 1980 reported a possible drone strike just prior to arriving in San Diego. The flight landed safely, and customers deplaned normally at the gate. Our maintenance team found no damage after thoroughly inspecting the aircraft,” United said in a statement to The Hill’s sister network NewsNation. According to United, the Boeing 737 flight was headed from San Francisco International Airport to San Diego International Airport, carrying 48 passengers and six crew members. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said in its own statement to NewsNation that it “is aware of the report and is investigating.” The agency said drones cannot be flown at elevations higher than 400 feet without authorization. The New York Post reported the flight struck at an altitude of roughly 3,000 feet during its approach. The outlet cited an air traffic control recording, with the pilot reportedly saying the object appeared “red” and “shiny.”

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

reported a possible drone strike

Look, I'm not saying it's wrong. I just get a very different mental image when I hear "done strike".

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago

What like a school full of children or a journalist in a car?

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Drone collision seems more accurate here.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Eh, it's just a modification of "bird strike" which is commonly used for "plane strikes bird"

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This. "Bird strike" is the accepted term for such a collision of a passenger aircraft with a bird. Thus drone strike.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Look, I'm not saying it's wrong. I just get a very different mental image when I hear "done strike".

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone’s phones auto correcting the word drone eh.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is interesting because 3,000 feet is well above the software-imposed ceiling of most consumer drones. I wonder if it was an older model with fewer restrictions or something else entirely.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's trivially easy to bypass for a lot of the DiY kits out there. I have actually sort of assumed that at some point they would try to kill that entire flight controller ecosystem under the guide of national security.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Uh oh. I’ve never really been interested in drones but this may have triggered my policy of snapping up any tech that I think is likely to get outlawed

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are you the asshole who keeps driving through my neighborhood at 1:30am with the illegal muffler modification?

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh sorry I meant plausibly useful tech

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Rad, carry on!

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago

Come on, those illegal muffler mods are super useful, how else are you going to announce to an entire mile radius area that you need an electron microscope just to find your dick?

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

3d printers are next. Cant be having the masses creating physical plastic products that could be sold to them instead.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Didn't they just essentially ban DJI?

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder if there's a way to trick the software limit so it thinks the ground is higher than it is, and allows a higher elevation above sea level. If you can make it think you're in Denver when you're actually in San Diego, it might let you fly a lot higher.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If the altimeter was disabled would the drone refuse to fly to begin with?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think the gps also returns an altitude. So it might not matter

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, you can 3D printer print them and if your techy enough, you could have an unregistered drone.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Red" and "shiny" at 3,000 feet.. Doesn't a balloon sound more likely? I'm no expert but I imagine violently shredding a LiPo battery in a jet turbine would not be catastrophic but at least noticeable

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

There was no damage to the plane. Therefore you could safely surmise the drone did not strike the engine.