this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
107 points (96.5% liked)

Soulslike - Discussion, News, Memes

1119 readers
29 users here now

This is a community for discussion, news, and memes pertaining to the video game sub-genre "soulslike".

Given Lemmy's size, the definition of soulslike may be treated relatively loosely. While games like the numerous FromSoft titles, the recent Star Wars Jedi games, Lies of P, Nioh and similar games should be the focus, games that incorporate soulslike elements - like Hollow Knight and Blasphemous, for example - may also be discussed here.

Basic Lemmy-quette applies. Additionally, since flairs don't exist yet, please do make sure to include a marker to denote what game your post is about in square brackets for clarity's sake. An example could be:

[BB] This enemy is so difficult!

or

[DS1] Anyone struggling with the gargoyles?

Friends:

!liesofp@lemmy.zip

!bloodborne@lemmy.zip

!sekiro@lemmy.zip

!eldenring@lemmy.world

!shittydarksouls@lemmy.world

Should you have any questions, please do let me know.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago

I know this is a meme but... I'm just gonna leave this here:

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.
This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness.

[–] starik@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Isn’t it gross how protagonists will take a helmet off a dead zombie and just put it on without washing it?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 7 points 3 days ago

I mean in half of these games we're basically also a filthy zombie

i lick it clean

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I'm just curious now what $1200 headphones sound like.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Like $250 headphones.

[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

10 or so years ago I read an article that once you get past $100, you start getting diminishing returns on quality. I’m sure that number has gone up tho.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

It's also worth remembering that there's nothing headphones can do to improve the audio that you put into them, they can only avoid making it worse. If you're using super fancy headphones, give them good quality audio to work with

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A decade ago, I was working in a big tech office with plenty of headphone enthusiasts. Open-backed cans from like Sennheiser were the expensive gold standard. They sound fine, though since open-back headphones are just head mounted speakers that everyone around you can hear, not especially great for the office.

My $150 (at the time) VModa headphones sounded just as good to my ears, I preferred that they were tuned for more bass, and they had Bluetooth as an option when I just needed to hear things and wasn't worried about quality. The Bluetooth battery gave out years ago, and I've had to replace the foam ear cups, but the headphones still work fine.

I'm sure they're all much more expensive and worse quality now, but yes, generally audio equipment is overpriced to scam people because it's harder to discern quality in audio. Cheaper headphones paired with a cheap headphone amplifier will sound better to most people than spending twice the combined amount on expensive headphones.

yeah, i just grabbed the cheapest cans that are comfortable with my glasses and called it good. i don't need to be dropping $400 on a new set of headphones every five or six years (i am rough on mine), i can be happier spending $40 or 50 and replacing the cord every year for a decade