this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2026
828 points (98.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

3143 readers
118 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

Introduction to Socialism (external links)

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/46475483

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 100 points 6 days ago (1 children)

67 brands of shampoo from 3 different multinational corporations whose CEOs are all best friends

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

flips it over

palm oil

"yep..."

[–] mech@feddit.org 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Even the first kind of freedom, for millions of Americans, is limited to whatever Walmart sells.
Cause there are no other shops left where they live.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 26 points 6 days ago

Also it's the freedom to choose between shampoo from Unilever and also shampoo from Unilever, but yellow.

[–] tangonov@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago

You think its 63 choices but it's actually 2 when you follow the money back to the parent companies. Oh, and you're prematurely bald thanks to the stress

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 days ago
[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 24 points 6 days ago (8 children)

That's America, not capitalism.

Europe, Canada etc, the unemployed have medical coverage.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Even setting aside America's bullshit Medical industry, yanks have really weird ideas about freedom.

As an Australian the American concept of freedom always seemed nuts, even pre-Trump. Yes American's have the freedom to carry firearms, but I much prefer the Australian freedom to live without fear of being shot.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I hate that when the world thinks of the US, they think of these 2A freaks. I get why it happens but I still hate it.

The one thing I'll push back on is your last point. Pretty much no one is afraid of getting shot. Gun violence IS an issue but it's not affecting 99.9% of people

[–] Soulg@ani.social 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Americans do not fear being shot on the daily either.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Americans do not fear being shot on the daily

Maybe if they did, something would be done about all the shootings

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Oh they absolutely do. It's one of the reasons they have such an ingrained gun fetish in their culture and incessantly complain about needing the right to open carry in a Walmart to "protect themselves from a bad guy with a gun."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 5 days ago

If you get stopped by the police because you're driving too fast or driving erratically, is there any chance they would draw their firearm during that interaction, even if they dont point it at you?

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

Always has been.

[–] Semjeza@fedinsfw.app 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Despite, not because.

Europe has it due to how strong Socialism looked post Second World War. Neoliberal Capitalism has been eroding it as best it can.

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago

Just give it some more years and it'll be gone anyway

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It is still capitalism, and capitalism is based off of exploitation regardless of whether you have health insurance or not.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 1 points 5 days ago

Okay but none of that makes the posted message true for most places.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I just wish we had full pharmacare in Canada. I know we got a partial rollout but I got laid off and lost my insurance and the actual price of some of my medicine is way crazier than I expected.

The last time I went to pick up medication, it cost me $450 (CAD) for only for 3 prescriptions which insane. Its nearly half of my EI which already pays less than what my rent is

Luckily I actually just got hired by another place and should have insurance again but damn, our system is still terrible

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Crazy idea, but medication should cost nothing. Nobody should have to choose between groceries and getting the medications they need.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 days ago

The freedom to speak your mind and live the life you want. So long as it conforms to what the ruling class decree.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Spoiler …all 63 brands of shampoo are owned by the same shareholders and shadowy investment firm

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

That's just America. There are plenty of capitalist countries where that's not the case.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The rest of the world may lag behind, but someday everyone will have the 63 shampoo flavors

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

We have the best of both worlds. 63 shampoo flavors and unemployment support.

[–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

My dream is instead of three people that own all 63 shampoo flavors, the workers own them

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Get out of here you filthy socialist commy anarchist antifa wanker! That would benefit the people...think of the billionaires who would suffer!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, you have concessions by the ruling class. For now...

[–] ManOMorphos@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TBH nowadays I don't think the US Federal government would ever give a single concession as they are now. Probably would rather roll in the military than make medication a bit cheaper.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

Well yea that was the goal of all those concessions , to keep the working class pacified while they consolidated power towards the owning class. Now they have consolidated that power and dismantled the foundations which bred the resistance efforts of the past and are comfortable in their assumptions they can now freely abuse the people without the need to make concessions.

We have reached the point that they were warning would come about by accepting these concessions as if they were progress.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago

No because you see you’re free to start your own telecoms company or hospital or bank with the money from your trust fund

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

These are two completely different kinds of 'freedom', that the English language coincidentally calls the same thing. All the other languages that I know of clearly distinguish the two. Interesting, isn't it?

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

So does English. The word everyone is confusing is liberty. We do not have freedom in America as is sold. We have liberty. Someone convinced too many they were the same thing.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

liberty: The state of being free from oppressive restrictions or control imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views

That's the one they're trying to dismantle right now...

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

As the song goes "freedom is just another word for 'nothing left to lose'"

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Freedom to smoke cigarettes after being born in 2008 🦅 🇺🇲

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

63 choices of shampoo, but only 3 choices of automobile

[–] tutter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Positive versus negative freedom. Always mix up which is which tho

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Let's ban all marketing, see what happens. They're the ones peddling bullshit.

load more comments
view more: next ›