this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2026
68 points (97.2% liked)

Global News

6578 readers
119 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/63262827

Chanting ‘from the river to the sea’ would be criminalised under proposed state law

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I think Israel shouldn’t exist.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone downvoted this, so I’m saying it again:

I think Israel shouldn’t exist.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ISRAEL SHOULDN’T EXIST GODDAMMIT

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

You downvote, I repeat. I can’t say it any bigger cause I already blew the largest font size but I don’t fucking care:

ISRAEL SHOULDN’T FUCKING EXIST.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago

100 years dungeon!

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the force is strong in this one

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I have no idea what that means, but Israel shouldn’t fuckin’ exist.

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

One of the founding principles in the Declaration of Independence is that no State has the right to exist without the consent of all people 'governed' within that States area of control.

Any American stating that Israel has a right to exist or demanding that others state that Israel has a right to exist are unAmerican. And being unAmerican in defense of a foreign State.

Fucking traitorous scum.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think you missed the first word of the title

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So what?

The use of the question: Do you believe Israel has a right to exist?

is a propaganda point universally used as a gotcha against critics of Israel.

Furthermore, while the view that States have no right to exist without the full consent of all of the governed is a (hypocritically held) American view, it is a universal one held by anyone who believes apartheid is wrong.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

My balanced take:

Israel has a right to exist in it's original borders. So has Palatine. Israeli genocide by their political elite must be stopped. We need a blue helmet peace mission to separate both groups back into their homes and rebuild. They need long term help to get off their religious bullshit and learn to be good neighbors.

Having a law criminalizing a radical opinion is not in the interest of free speech and should have no place in Germany nor any place. You have the right to be stupid, I draw the line at violence. As should the law.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Israel has a right to exist in it's original borders.

What "original" borders? The borders they established in 1948 by ethnically cleansing Palestinian land? The historical borders of Judea and Samaria? If so which ones? Are we going to rely on the historiagraphy of Israelis who determined those historical borders too? Why should we legitimize an explicitly settler colonial project who has only caused problems for an entire region since its inception? What even gives a state the "right to exist".

I agree that we need an organized international intervention but we should also seriously investigate the purpose of Israel. Who benefits from its continue existence and why is incredibly important to determining what to do going forward. I am of the opinion that a two state solution only leaves us where we were a few decades ago. It allows the settlers to bide their time.

[–] Omodi@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

States don't have rights people have rights.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

I tend to agree on a technicality. But the state is formed and represented by its it's people. Therefore there is a right to exist that's derived from the peoples right to exist as well as a right to defend themselves that derives from it's peoples right to safety. Let's just say Israel has gone somewhat overboard and the US is somewhat stoking that fire for religious and political reasons and that needs to stop.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 2 weeks ago

Israel has a right to exist in it’s original borders

Lebensraum.

No it doesn't.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

They have unequivocally proberen that they cannot live in the middle east without starting shit. Maybe the Madagascar plan wasn't too bad an idea?

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Palatine

I have a feeling Germany isn't gonna approve of that one either. Especially since that's where the nukes are.

[–] Sualtam@lemmus.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Words incite violence. Every genocide starts with rethoric. We have t8 curtail speech. Everything else is 18th century naivité.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Discussion is healthy and being able to speak to people about their opinion is the only way to potentially change it. That's hard to do it their opinion is illegal. Which is why freedom of speech is so important.

You are speaking about fighting propaganda, which is another thing entirely.

[–] Sualtam@lemmus.org 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a naive take. The right to life, health and a peace for million of people is paramount to some hateful bigots right to free speech.

Human rights can conflict with eachother. We have to make a choice.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll make an example you might understand: I'll block you now, see how you feel not being able to spill your fascist tea. ;)

[–] Sualtam@lemmus.org 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for not wasting my time.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It isn't a law yet luckily

I do wonder how this is even being considered. Do Germans not have legally protected free speech?

[–] chaitae3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes we do, that doesn't prevent conservatives and nazis from saying stuff like that. They're shifting the Overton window.

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

like that

like what? ‘from the river to the sea’?

[–] chaitae3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I meant like proposing to criminalise something that is obviously guaranteed by the constitution. They do that all the time.

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe the German government thinks it's important for Jews to see how easy it is to fall for a Reichstag fire event.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Israel has as much right to exist as any other state.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Much as I hate states, a democratic state that proportionally represents all people in its territory has more right to exist than other states. Palesinians can't vote so Israel has less right to exist than some other states.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Democracy doesn't need a state. If you hate states, then you shouldn't defend them tbh. They are inherently anti-democratic in the way they arbitrarily decide who is and isn't part of the represented group (e.g. by borders)

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't disagree but I think you are missing the point.

It shouldn't be legal to say Israel doesn't have a right to exist. People should be allowed to voice an option freely without fear of harm.